10.57647/j.ccd.2025.0801.04

Cultural components regeneration in the development of physical factors in the design of residential spaces (case study: damghan city)

PDF
  • Fatemeh Kosari1,
  • Mohammad Jafar Karbaschi*1,
  • Gholamhossein Naseri1,
  1. Department of Architecture, Damghan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Damghan, Iran

Received: 2023-01-29

Revised: 2023-04-12

Accepted: 2023-08-19

Published in Issue 2025-03-01

Copyright (c) 2025 Fatemeh Kosari, Mohammad Jafar Karbaschi, Gholamhossein Naseri (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Kosari, F., Karbaschi, M. J., & Naseri, G. (2025). Cultural components regeneration in the development of physical factors in the design of residential spaces (case study: damghan city). Creative City Design, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.ccd.2025.0801.04
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 178

Abstract

Aims: The present study aimed to regenerate the cultural components in the physical factors development in line with the design of residential spaces (Case study of Damghan). The present study can be considered as a descriptive correlation and field research.
Methodology: The statistical population of this study included two groups of experts and ordinary people. After extracting the  indicators and components of physical and cultural factors as a questionnaire to confirm the indicators, the desired questionnaire was given to ten experts and the third round of the Delphi method was performed after collecting the answers of members, and the acceptable agreement was obtained in the third round of Delphi method. To evaluate the validity of the questionnaire, face, and qualitative validity methods were used. After the validity confirmation by experts, the reliability of the questionnaire was confirmed, with Cronbach’s alpha value higher than 0.7. Then, a simple random questionnaire was selected and distributed among 384 people in Damghan.
Findings: The results showed that the coefficients of independent variables for cultural characteristics are equal to 0.083, qualitative norms are equal to 0.09 for cultural communications and interactions are equal to 0.40, respectively. The t-statistic value for one independent variables is greater than the standard value (1.96.), and this value according to (sig. = 0.000) at the 95% confidence level is significant, so it can be said that among the dimensions and cultural components effective in the design of residential spaces, only one dimension of communication and cultural interactions are effective, but the effect of cultural characteristics and qualitative norms on the design of residential space is not significant.
Conclusion: The findings of this research showed that physical factors had a positive effect on the design of residential space. But the effect of cultural characteristics and qualitative norms on residential space design was not significant. 

Keywords

  • Design,
  • Concept,
  • Ideation,
  • Architecture,
  • Design models,
  • Concept problems
PDF

References

  1. Y. Ebazadeh, Alayi, R., & M., Kiani Sakaleh, "Designing a mobile tourism program and achieving sustainable development". Anthropogenic Pollution, 5(2),2021. https://doi.org/10.22034/ap.2021.1929091.1103
  2. H. Gholamalizadeh and A. Khorram. “Mechanism of culture and home interaction.”. International Conference on Civil Engineering, Architecture, and Urban Infrastructure., 2015. https://www.en.symposia.ir/ISCIVILI02
  3. A. Yazdanfar, B. Hosseini, and M. Zaroudi. “Culture and shape of a house (case study: traditional houses of tonekabon and ramsar).”. Journal of Housing and Rural Environment, 32(144), 2013. http://jhre.ir/article-1-454-en.html
  4. N. Mastari-Farahani and F. Hasanali, "Analytical Study and Presenting a Conceptual Model of Design in Accordance with Humanist Housing (Monograph Case Study: Mehr Housing in Qazvin)," Urban Economics and Planning, 4 2 (2023): 210-226, doi: 10.22034/uep.2023.408861.1388
  5. A. Karimzadeh and S. K. A. Shahriari. “The explanation of the cultural policies affecting culture-based urban regeneration (with emphasis on the experiences of urban regeneration in istanbul, turkey).”. Journal of City Identity, 29:95–106, 2018. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/488264
  6. S. H. Pourdihimi, R. Madani, and S. F. Mousavinia. “Physical factors affecting the perception of density in residential environments (case example: residential areas of mashhad).”. Journal of Iranian Architecture Studies, 6(11):43–61, 2016. https://jias.kashanu.ac.ir/article_111780.html?lang=en
  7. M., Javadi Nodeh, A., Shahcheraghi, & A. Andalib, “An Evaluation of Ecological Solutions Based on Energy Efficiency In the Vernacular Architecture of Ardabil”. Anthropogenic Pollution, 5(1). 2021. https://doi.org/10.22034/ap.2021.1921696.1087
  8. M. Bagheri, F. Asadpour, F. Ahangar Narenj bin, and N. Hemmati. “Examination of aesthetic concepts in Islamic culture and its reflection in the architectural structures of the new era.”. The first national conference on architecture, 2016. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jspsich.3.4.10
  9. S. A. Hosseini, Ashrafi, A. Shadpour , H. & Sadeghian, S. The Reflection of Iranian-Islamic Culture in the Architectural Decorations of the Bastam Complex with Emphasis on the Comparison of the Ilkhanid and Timurid Periods. Journal of Social-Political Studies of Iran’s Culture and History, 3(4), 168-189. 2025. https://doi.org/10.61838/kman.jspsich.3.4.10
  10. A. Yaran and H. Behroo. “The impact of islamic culture and ethics on housing and spatial body of houses, case study: houses of the qajar era in ardabil.”. Quarterly Journal of Islamic Architecture Research, 15:91–107, 2017. http://jria.iust.ac.ir/article-1-767-en.html
  11. A. K. Carter. “Building from the ground up: the archaeology of residential spaces and communities in southeast asia.”. Journal of Archaeological Research, 31(1):1–54, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10814-021-09170-4
  12. N. Lazar and K. Chithra. “Role of culture in sustainable development and sustainable built environment: a review.”. Environment, Development, and Sustainability, 24(5):5991–6031, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01691-8
  13. A. E. Clark, S. Ranlett, and M. C. Stiner. “Domestic spaces as crucibles of paleolithic culture: an archaeological perspective.”. Journal of Human Evolution, 172:103266, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103266
  14. D. L. Brunsman, N. G. Chapman, J. W. Kim, J. S. Lellock, M. Underhill, E. T. Withers, and J. P. Wyse. “The culture of white space: on the racialized production of meaning.”. American Behavioral Scientist, 64(14):2001–2015, 2020. Doi:10.1177/0002764220975081
  15. M. Kobi. “Urban energy landscape in practice: architecture, infrastructure and the material culture of cooling in post-reform chongqing, china.”. Urban Studies, page 00420980231153309, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1177/00420980231153
  16. J. S. House. “Social structure and personality.”. Social psychology, pages 525–561, 2017. Doi:10.1007/978-94-007-6772-0_4
  17. A. Eshghi Sanati, M. J. Karbaschi, & G. Naseri, “Evaluating the importance and application of natural signs and environmental symbols in contemporary Iranian architecture”. Anthropogenic Pollution, 8(1). 2024. https://doi.org/10.57647/j.jap.2024.0801.07
  18. A. Daneshpour and M. Charkhchyan. “Public spaces and factors affecting collective life.”. The Monthly Scientific Journal of Bagh-E Nazar, 4(7):19–28, 2007. https://www.bagh-sj.com/article_64.html?lang=en
  19. C. Pasalar. “.”. The effects of spatial layouts on students’ interactions in middle schools: multiple case analysis, 2003. https://www.academia.edu/81886523/The_Effects_of_Spatial_Layouts_on_Students_Interactions_in_Middle_Schools_Multiple_Case_Analysis
  20. A. Javan Faruzandeh and Q. Metabhi. “The concept of belonging to a place and its constituent factors.”. Scientific and Research Journal of Shahr Identity, 8:27–38, 2018. https://ensani.ir/fa/article/488086
  21. H. Feridonzadeh, “Window view in Facade of Notre Dame Cathedral Cases study; Paris, Lyon, Marseille, and Nice of France” Anthropogenic Pollution, 5(2). 2021,https://doi.org/10.22034/ap.2021.1927244.1101
  22. V. Mohammad Derini, M. Taban, E. Namdar Joyimi, and N. Bahaner. “Investigating the relationship between symbolic capital and cultural capital (case study of ilam State university students).”. Culture and Communication Studies Quarterly, 16(31): 178–197, 2015. https://sid.ir/paper/213431/en
  23. B. Tankabani and P. Shahabian. “Recognizing social and cultural norms in tehran’s urban public spaces.”. Welfare Planning and Social Development, 10(35):229–257, 2017. https://doi.org/10.22054/qjsd.2018.9315.
  24. S. Parvardinejad, M. Hamzenejad, N. Dehghan, and M. Kian Erthi. “A comparative study of the influence of culture and climate on the formation of qajar houses in shiraz and kashan.”. Journal of Architectural Thought, 5(10):182–201, 2022. 10.30479/at.2020.10953.1230
  25. A. Golshahi, V. Ghobadian, & M. Matin, Modeling the pattern of energy consumption in residential buildings based on optimal energy management approach (A case study: Conventional Apartments in Lahijan, Iran). Anthropogenic Pollution, 8(1). 2024. https://doi.org/10.57647/j.jap.2024.0801.05
  26. D. Nami, E. Fataei, A. Nejaei, & M. Zaeimdar, “Evaluation of environmental potential in Parsabad, Moghan for urban development using GIS and AHP” Journal of Environmental Scienc and Technology, 19(5):475-486,2017. https://www.magiran.com/p1804325
  27. M. Emami, F. Hasanpour, and H. Mehrpouya. “Analytical exploration of the role of culture in body-architecture design (a case study of north khorasan, bojnord county).”. Scientific and research quarterly of new attitudes in human geography, 12(4):811– 825, 2019. 20.1001.1.1735708.1400.18.42.2.3
  28. A. Omrani pour, M. Niazi, & S. Khazaiyan, “A Comparative Study of the Relationship among Architecture, Consumption, and Culture in the Houses of Old and New Fabric of the City of Hamedan” Hoviatshahr,15(45): 35-48. 2021.10.30495/HOVIATSHAHR.2021.15655
  29. A. Drees and H. Hayati. “Explaining the practical role of islamic culture and teachings on the body of housing architecture in iran.”. The 4th National Conference on Architecture and Sustainable City, 2017. https://civilica.com/doc/873047.
  30. Gh. Ali Mohamadi, R. Abdolahi, “Explanation of the basics of culture in Iranian native architecture and its relation with the creation of a sense of belonging to place”. Intenational Journal of Urban and Rural Management, 17 (50) :33-46, 2018,
  31. URL: http://ijurm.imo.org.ir/article-1-2163-fa.html
  32. A. A. L. Al-Thahab. “Culture and architecture in turmoil: reflections on home architecture in contemporary iraq.”. Open House International, 2020.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-06-2020-0065.
  33. M. Shahbazi, M. Yeganeh and M. R. Bemanian, "Identifying the Physical-Spatial Factors Affecting Environmental Vitality of Open Spaces within Residential Complexes from the Views of Designers and Residents; Case Study: Residential Complexes of Tehran," Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 13 (30):117-137, 2019, doi: 10.22034/aaud.2019.189635.1903
  34. K. S. Tabibzadeh, H., Mozterzadeh, P., Mohammad, Hodjati, V.. “Identifyingthe most influential physicalenvironmental subcomponents of social housing on users’place attachment (case study: shiraz).”. the Journal of Creative city design, 7(1), 2024. https://www.magiran.com/p2735575
  35. H. Mohamadshafiee, L. Karimifard, Zh. Rezakhani, “Analyzing physical-spatial (architectural) components in creating a sense of attachment from the perspective of tourists (case study: si-o-se-pol bridge in isfahan).” Journal Creative city design, 7, 2023. 10.30495/ccd.2023.1977321.1183
  36. A. Yari Kia, A. Dinarond, and B. Vathiq. “Investigating the effect of physical factors on the improvement of the quality of architectural spaces based on neuropsychology.”. The 7th scientific research conference on the development and promotion of architectural sciences and urban planning in Iran, 2019.https://civilica.com/doc/1180419/