10.57647/j.jtap.2025.1901.05

Thermal neutrons produced from an 241Am-Be source in different moderators

  1. School of Physics, Damghan University, P.O. Box 36716-41167, Damghan, Iran

Received: 2024-09-30

Revised: 2024-12-02

Accepted: 2024-12-24

Published 2025-02-10

How to Cite

1.
Sadeghi K, Tajik M. Thermal neutrons produced from an 241Am-Be source in different moderators . J Theor Appl phys. 2025 Feb. 10;19(01):1-8. Available from: https://oiccpress.com/jtap/article/view/8600

PDF views: 29

Abstract

A cylindrical proportional gas detector has been developed and simulated using the MCNPX code for neutron detection. This setup is specifically designed for use in nuclear laboratories that utilize neutron sources for educational and research activities. To achieve this goal, BF3 gas detector with a cylindrical geometry of 31.11 cm length and 1.219 cm radius was considered. The simulation results were then used to experimentally test the system with different moderators such as water, paraffin and polyethylene (PE). These measurements were performed with a 1.591E11 Bq (4.3 Ci) 241Am-Be isotopic neutron source. The simulation outcomes indicated that variations in moderator thickness and material have effects on the counts of the neutron detection setup, which are in agreement with the experimental data. Also, the comparison between the measurement and simulation results shows that an online neutron detection system, with BF3 gas detectors, can reliably monitor the neutron flux background radiation within a laboratory environment.

Keywords

  • Detection system,
  • BF3 tube,
  • Moderator,
  • Neutron

References

  1. Knoll GF, Kraner HW. Radiation Detection and Measurement. vol. 69. John Wiley & Sons; 1981. https://doi.org/10.1109/PROC.1981.12016.
  2. Lippold WJ, Carnesale A, Gardner RP. A Monte Carlo simulation of the surface-type neutron moisture gauge. Nucl Eng Des 1969;10:373–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5493(69)90074-0.
  3. Saegusa J, Yoshizawa M, Tanimura Y, Yoshida M, Yamano T, Nakaoka H. Evaluation of energy responses for neutron dose-equivalent meters made in Japan. Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers, Detect Assoc Equip 2004;516:193–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2003.07.045.
  4. Nasir R, Aziz F, Mirza SM, Mirza NM. Experimental and theoretical study of BF3 detector response for thermal neutrons in reflecting materials. Nucl Eng Technol 2018;50:439–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.net.2017.12.014.
  5. Kovaltchouk V, MacHrafi R. Monte Carlo simulations of response functions for gas filled and scintillator detectors with MCNPX code. Ann Nucl Energy 2011;38:788–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2010.11.022.
  6. Rezaei-Ochbelagh D. Comparison of 3He and BF 3 neutron detectors used to detect hydrogenous material buried in soil. Radiat Phys Chem 2012;81:379–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2011.12.031.
  7. Lintereur A, Conlin K, Ely J, Erikson L, Kouzes R, Siciliano E, et al. 3He and BF3 neutron detector pressure effect and model comparison. Nucl Instruments Methods Phys Res Sect A Accel Spectrometers, Detect Assoc Equip 2011;652:347–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2010.10.040.
  8. Yamashita M, Stephens LD, Smith AR, Patterson HW. Detection Efficiency of Bare and Moderated BF3-Gas-Filled Proportional Counters for Isotropic Neutron Fluxes. J Nucl Sci Technol 1966;3:343–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/18811248.1966.9732339.
  9. A. Castro V, A. Cavalieri T, T.D. Siqueira P, G. Fedorenko G, R. P. Coelho P, M. Filho T. MCNP to study the BF-3 detection efficiency. Int Nucl Atl Conf 2011;7.
  10. Cardenas JPN, Filho TM, Petri AR, Dos Santos RA, Martins JFT, Carvalho DVS, et al. Experimental and MCNP studies of Paraffin and Polyethylene in Neutron Moderation and BF3 Detector Efficiency. 2013 3rd Int. Conf. Adv. Nucl. Instrumentation, Meas. Methods Their Appl. ANIMMA 2013, IEEE; 2013, p. 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/ANIMMA.2013.6727922.
  11. Oryema B, A. M. Nader M, A. E. Agamy S. Response function estimation for in-core BF-3 and He-3 neutron detectors using MCNPX - case study of Opal reactor. Adv Appl Sci Res 2017;8:76–89.
  12. Pelowitz DB. MCNPX user’s manual, version 2.6. 0, LA-CP-07-1473. Los Alamos Natl Lab Los Alamos 2008.
  13. Gujrathi SC, D’Auria JM. The attenuation of fast neutrons in shielding materials. Nucl Instruments Methods 1972;100:445–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-554X(72)90819-1.
  14. Ghavami A, Tajik M. Design of an on-line monitoring system based on a 3He detector. Appl Radiat Isot 2022;188:110366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2022.110366.
  15. Tajik M, Ghal-Eh N, Etaati GR, Afarideh H. NE213/BC501A scintillator−lightguide assembly response to 241Am−Be neutrons: An MCNPX−PHOTRACK hybrid code simulation. Radiat Phys Chem 2014;97:319–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2013.12.011.
  16. Tahanipour N, Tajik M. Characterization of the neutron flux of a 4.3 Ci Am-Be irradiation site using the cadmium ratio k0 method. Ann Nucl Energy 2024;202:110493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anucene.2024.110493.
  17. Peeples CR, Mickael M, Gardner RP. On replacing Am–Be neutron sources in compensated porosity logging tools. Appl Radiat Isot 2010;68:926–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apradiso.2009.11.042.
  18. Detwiler R, McConn R, Grimes T, Upton S, Engel E. Compendium of Material Composition Data for Radiation Transport Modeling. Richland, WA (United States): Pacific Northwest National Lab.(PNNL), Richland, WA (United States); 2021. https://doi.org/10.2172/1782721.
  19. ISO SN. Reference neutron radiations–Part 1: Characteristics and methods of production. Int Stand Organ 2001:8521–9.
  20. Kang HY, Park CJ, Seo KS, Yoon JS. Evaluation of neutron shielding effects on various materials by using a Cf-252 source. J Korean Phys Soc 2008;52:1744–7. https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.52.1744.
  21. Brown DA, Chadwick MB, Capote R, Kahler AC, Trkov A, Herman MW, et al. ENDF/B-VIII.0: The 8th Major Release of the Nuclear Reaction Data Library with CIELO-project Cross Sections, New Standards and Thermal Scattering Data. Nucl Data Sheets 2018;148:1–142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2018.02.001.