10.57647/j.jrs.2025.1501.01

Cattle grazing impacts on shoot and root characteristicsof Urochloa decumbens (Stapf) R. Webster and Axonopuscompressus (Sw.) P. Beauv. in tropical pastures ofMalaysia

PDF HTML
  • Majid Ajorlo*1,
  • Ramdzani B. Abdullah2,
  • Mahboubeh Ebrahimian3,
  1. Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Faculty of Soil and Water, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
  2. Faculty of Forestry and Environment, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Malaysia
  3. Research Institute for Hamoun International Wetland, University of Zabol, Zabol, Iran
Cattle grazing impacts on shoot and root characteristicsof Urochloa decumbens (Stapf) R. Webster a

Received: 2023-08-04

Revised: 2023-01-20

Accepted: 2024-01-29

Published 2025-01-20

Copyright (c) 2025 Majid Ajorlo, Ramdzani B. Abdullah, Mahboubeh Ebrahimian (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Ajorlo, M. ., Abdullah, R. B., & Ebrahimian, M. (2025). Cattle grazing impacts on shoot and root characteristicsof Urochloa decumbens (Stapf) R. Webster and Axonopuscompressus (Sw.) P. Beauv. in tropical pastures ofMalaysia. Journal of Rangeland Science, 15(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.57647/j.jrs.2025.1501.01
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 23

HTML views: 4

Abstract

This study aimed to assess the responses of Signal grass (Urochloa decumbens) and Carpet grass (Axonopus compressus) shoot and root systems to cattle grazing. Two sites with different grazing strategies were selected in pastures of Selangor state, Malaysia in 2016: one site was dominated by Signal grass and grazed with moderate intensity for long-term (LMG, 2.7 animal unit/ha/yr) and the second site was dominated by Carpet grass and grazed with heavy intensity for short-term (SHG, 5 animal unit/ha/yr). Shoot growth was similarly assessed for both species by measuring herbage mass, plant height, regrowth rate, tiller density and litter biomass four times at the end of the growing periods in both grazed and ungrazed (control) sites. Root samples of species were taken from the center of the individual plants to a depth of 30 cm and analyzed for root length, diameter, surface area, volume and mass using WinRhizo Root Scanner. The relationship between root distribution parameters and soil depth was examined using least square curve fitting. The LMG strategy increased herbage production (g DM/m2), regrowth rate (g DM/d/m2) and tiller density of Signal grass by 19, 26 and 69%, respectively, compared with the ungrazed site (P<0.05). For this grazing strategy, the mean root length (-18%) decreased (P<0.05), but root mass (+46%) increased (P<0.05). In SHG strategy, herbage production and regrowth rate of Carpet grass were unaffected by grazing but tiller density was 147% increased than the ungrazed site. This grazing strategy decreased mean root length by 38%, but increased root diameter and volume of Carpet grass by 22 and 59%, respectively, and had no effect on root mass. It was concluded that short-term heavy grazing had negative impacts on the root characteristics of studied species than long-term moderate grazing. Therefore, long-term moderate grazing by cattle is recommended for the study area.

Keywords

  • Herbage Mass,
  • Regrowth Rate,
  • Root Distribution.,
  • Root morphology,
  • Tiller Density
PDF HTML

References

  1. Ajorlo, M., Ebrahimian, M. and Abdullah R.B. 2014. Effect of long-term cattle grazing on root distribution and morphological characteristics of Brachiaria decumbens (Case study: tropical pasture, Malaysia). Journal of Range and Watershed Management 67 (3): 333-344. https://doi.org/10.22059/jrwm.2014.52823.
  2. Ajorlo, M. 2010. Impact of Cattle Grazing on Environmental Variables in Pasture-Based Livestock Production System. PhD dissertation, University Putra Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur.
  3. Anderson, P.M.L. and Hoffman, M.T. 2007. The impacts of sustained heavy grazing on plant diversity and composition in lowland and upland habitats across the Kamiesberg mountain range in the Succulent Karoo, South Africa. Journal of Arid Environments 70: 686–700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2006.05.017.
  4. Arredondo, J.T. and Johnson D.A. 1998. Clipping effects on root architecture and morphology of three range grasses. Journal of Range Management 51:207–214. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003209.
  5. Arredondo, J.T. and Johnson, D.A. 1999. Root architecture and biomass allocation of three range grasses in response to non-uniform supply of nutrients and shoot defoliation. New Phytologist 143:373–385. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-8137.1999.00460.x.
  6. Arredondo, J.T. and Johnson, D.A. 2009. Root responses to short-lived pulses of soil nutrients and shoot defoliation in seedlings of three rangeland grasses. Rangeland Ecology and Management 62: 470–479. https://doi.org/10.2111/08-151.1.
  7. Bilotta, G.S., Brazier, R.E. and Haygarth, P.M. 2007. The impacts of grazing animals on the quality of soils, vegetation, and surface waters in intensively managed grasslands. Advances in Agronomy 94: 237–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2113(06)94006-1.
  8. Bluett, S.J., Matthew C., Bishop-Hurley G.J. 1998. The relationship between herbage mass and pasture accumulation rate in winter. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research. 41: 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.1998.9513314.
  9. Chen, Y., Lee, P., Lee, G., Mariko, S. And Oikawa, T. 2006. Simulating root responses to grazing of a Mongolian grassland ecosystem. Plant Ecology 183: 265 –275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-005-9038-7.
  10. Dawson, L.A., Grayston, S.J. and Paterson, E. 2000. Effects of grazing on the roots and rhizosphere of grasses. 61–84. In: Grassland Ecophysiology and Grazing Ecology. CABI Publishing, New
  11. Gillison, A.N. 2006. A field manual for rapid vegetation classification and survey for general purposes. Center for International Forestry Research, Jakarta, Indonesia, 85 p. York. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.2001.00256.x.
  12. Deutsch, E.S., Bork, E.W. and Willms, W.D. 2010. Soil moisture and plant growth responses to litter and defoliation impacts in Parkland grasslands. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 135: 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.08.002.
  13. Donkor, N.T., Gedir, J.V., Hudson, R.J., Bork, E.W., Chanasyk, D.S. and Naeth, M.A., 2001. Impacts of grazing systems on soil compaction and pasture production in Alberta. Canadian Journal Soil Science. 82: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4141/S01-008.
  14. Engel, R.K., Nichols, J.T., Dodd, J.L. and Brummer, J.E. 1998. Root and shoot responses of sand bluestem to defoliation. Journal of Range Management 51: 42–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/4003562.
  15. Greenwood, K.L. and Hutchinson, K.J. 1998. Root characteristics of temperature pasture in New South Wales after grazing at three stocking rates for 30 years. Grass and Forage Science 53: 120–128. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2494.1998.5320120.x.
  16. Guenni, O., Marín, D. and Baruch, Z. 2002. Responses to drought of five Brachiaria species. I. Biomass production, leaf growth, root distribution, water use and forage quality. Plant Soil 243:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019956719475.
  17. Hendrickson, J. and Olson, B. 2006. Understanding plant response to grazing. Pages 32–39. In: K. Launchbaugh, ed., Targeted grazing: A natural approach to vegetation management and landscape enhancement. Centennial, CO: American Sheep Industry Association. http://dx.doi.org/10.2111/1551-5.
  18. Hoglind, M., Hanslin, H..M. and Van Oijen, M. 2005. Timothy regrowth, tillering and leaf area dynamics following spring harvest at two growth stages. Field Crops Research. 93: 51–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.09.009.
  19. Holland, J.P., Waterhouse, A., Robertson, D. and Pollock, M.L. 2008. Effect of different grazing management systems on the herbage mass and pasture height of a Nardus stricta grassland in western Scotland, United Kingdom. Grass and Forage Science 63: 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2494.2007.00613.x.
  20. Langlands, J. P., Bennett, I. L. 1973. Stocking intensity and pastoral production. III. Wool production, fleece characteristics and the utilisation of nutrients for maintenance and wool growth by Merino sheep grazed at different stocking rates. Journal of Agricultural Science 81: 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600058858.
  21. Li, C., Hao, X., Willms, W.D., Zhao, M. and Han, G. 2009. Seasonal response of herbage production and its nutrient and mineral contents to long-term cattle grazing on a Rough Fescue grassland. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 132: 32–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2009.02.010.
  22. Lodge, G.M. and Murphy, S.R. 2006. Root depth of native and sown perennial grass-based pastures, North-West Slopes, New South Wales. 1. Estimates from cores and effects of grazing treatments. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture 45: 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA04276.
  23. Mannetje, L. 1978. Measurement of grassland vegetation and animal production. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Bulletin 52, Hurley. Berkshire, England.
  24. Martınez, L.J. and Zinck, J.A. 2004. Temporal variation of soil compaction and deterioration of soil quality in pasture areas of Colombian Amazonia. Soil and Tillage Research 75: 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2002.12.001.
  25. Matthew, C., Xia, J.X., Chu, A.C.P., Mackay, A.D. and Hodgson, J., 1991. Relationship between root production and tiller appearance rates in perennial rye grass (Lolium perenne). In: Atkinson, D. (ed.) Plant root growth: An Ecological perspective. British Ecological Society. 10, 281-290.
  26. McInenly, L.E., Merrill, E.H., Cahill, J.F. and Juma, N.G. 2009. Festuca campestris alters root morphology and growth in response to simulated grazing and nitrogen form. Functional Ecology 10: 283–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01642.x.
  27. Milchunas, D.G. and Lauenroth, W.K. 1993. Quantitative effects of grazing on vegetation and soils over a global range of environments. Ecological Monographs 63: 327–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2937150.
  28. Mousel, E.M., Schacht, W.H. and Moser, L.E. 2004. Root and vigor response of Big bluestem to summer grazing strategies. In: proceeding of 20th international grassland congress. 29 June – 5 July, Dublin, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0694.
  29. Mousel, E.M., Schacht, W.H., Zanner, C.W. and Moser, L.E. 2005. Effects of summer grazing strategies on organic reserves and root characteristics of Big bluestem. Crop Science 45: 2008–2014. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2004.0694.
  30. Oliveria, M.R.G., Van Noordwijk, M. and Gaze, S.R. 2000. Auger sampling, ingrowth cores and pinboard methods. In: A.L. Smit et al., (ed.) Root methods. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04188-8_6.
  31. Oliveria, M.R.G., Brasil, F.C., Monterio, Q.I. and Rossiello R.O.P. 2004. Rooting pattern distribution and spatial variability of Italian Ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum) in a Mediterranean region. In: proceeding of 20th International grassland congress. 29 June – 5 July, Dublin, Ireland.
  32. Peng, Z., Bai, M., Xu, Ch. and Yu, X. 2022. Effects of different rest grazing periods on the reproduction and root characteristics of Carex capillifolia in subalpine meadow. Global Ecology and Conservation, 38: 02248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2022.e02248.
  33. Pinto, J.C., Santos, I.P.A. and Furtini Neto, A. E. 2004. Growth characteristics of Kikuyu grass with different sources and doses of phosphorus. In: proceeding of 20th International grassland congress. 29 June – 5 July, Dublin, Ireland.
  34. Richards, J.H. 1984. Root growth response to defoliation in two Agropyron bunchgrasses: Field observations with an improved periscope. Oecologia 64: 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00377538.
  35. Risser, P.G. and Parton, W.J. 1982. Ecosystem Analysis of the Tall grass Prairie: Nitrogen Cycle. Ecology. 63: 1342-1351. https://doi.org/10.2307/1938862.
  36. Sabrissia, A.F., Da silva, S.C., Molan L.K. and Sarmento D.O.L. 2004. Tiller population density and sward stability of Brachiaria brizantha continuously stocked by cattle. In: Proceeding of 20th International grassland congress. 29 June – 5 July, Dublin, Ireland.
  37. Shakhane, L.M., Mulcahy, C., Scott, J.M., Hinch, G.N., Donald, G.E. and Mackay, D.F. 2013. Pasture herbage mass, quality and growth in response to three whole-farmlet management systems. Animal Production Science 53: 685–698. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN12262.
  38. Shelton, H. M. and Wilson, J. R. 1990. Growth, morphology and nutritive quality of shaded Stenotaphrum secundatum, Axonopus compressus and Pennisetum clandestinum. The Journal of Agricultural Science 114 (2): 161-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600072154.
  39. Smith, J. and Valenzuela, H. 2002. Carpet grass, Co-operative Extension Service, University of Hawaii, Sustainable Agriculture, Cover Crops, August, SA-CC-1. Retrieved from www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/oc/freepubs/pdf/CoverCrop/carpetgrass.pdf
  40. Suhartini, S., Evanuarini, H., Safitri, R. and Azkarahman, A.R. 2020. Evaluation and development of crop and cattle integration modeling the rural area of Sekotong sub-district, west Lombok district, Indonesia. Journal of Rangeland Science 10(4): 393–401.
  41. Sulistijo, E.D., Subagyo, I., Chuzaemi, S. and Sudarwati, H. 2021. Assessment of forage production and its nutritional values for local cattle farming in rangelands of Kupang regency Indonesia. Journal of Rangeland Science 11(4): 457-469.
  42. Van Noordwijk, M. 1993. Roots: length, biomass, production and mortality. Methods for root research: In: Anderson, J.M. and Ingram, J.S.I (eds). Tropical soil biology and fertility: A Handbook of methods. CABI publishing, Wallingford, 132–144. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479700018354.
  43. Wang, Ch., Li, X., Lu, X., Wang, Y. and Bai, Y. 2023. Intraspecific trait variation governs grazing-induced shifts in plant community above- and below-ground functional trait composition. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 346: 108357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2023.108357.
  44. Xie, Y. and Wittig, R. 2004. The impact of grazing intensity on soil characteristics of Stipa grandis and Stipa bungeana steppe in northern China (autonomous region of Ningxia). Acta Oecologica. 25: 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2004.01.004.