Predicting the mechanical characteristics of hydrogen functionalized graphene sheets using artificial neural network approach

Abstract

The mechanical properties of hydrogen functionalized graphene (HFG) sheets werepredicted in this work by using artificial neural network approach. Thepredictions of tensile strength of HFG sheets made by the proposed approach arecompared to those generated by molecular dynamics simulations. The resultsindicate that our proposed computing technique can be used as a powerful toolfor predicting the tensile strength of the HFG sheet.


Background

Research in graphene has attracted significant interest in recent years due to itsremarkable mechanical [ 1 ] and physical properties [ 2 , 3 ]. A single-layer graphene sheet has the thickness of only one carbon atomwhich makes it the thinnest material [ 4 ] with a large specific surface area [ 5 ]. This feature of graphene makes it an ideal candidate fornanoelectromechanical systems (NEMS) [ 6 ] and nanofluidic devices. These future applications require a criticalunderstanding of the exceptional mechanical properties of graphene for itsapplication in NEMS and nanolevel biological devices. Theoretical studies ongraphene are a popular mode of research, employing ab initio calculationsor molecular dynamics (MD) simulation technique.

Application of soft computing methods such as artificial neural networks (ANN),genetic programming, and fuzzy logic can be used as an alternative method formodeling complex behavior of materials such as graphene. These methods require inputtraining data which can be obtained from the analytical tools such as MD that isbased on a specific geometry and temperature. Based on the input, the proposedcomputing method can then be able to generate meaningful solutions for complicatedproblems [ 711 ]. Additionally, among the various soft computing methods described above,ANN offers the advantage of a fast and cost-effective formulation of a mathematicalmodel based on multiple variables with no existing analytical models [ 12 , 13 ]. It is to the best of author's knowledge that limited or no work existson the application of soft computing models on the tensile properties of graphenesheets.

Hence, in the present work, we have proposed ANN method to model the elasticcharacteristics of hydrogen functionalized graphene (HFG). The values of tensilestrength of HFG generated by MD simulations are further fed into the paradigm ofANN.

Nanoscale material modeling by MD simulation

The classical MD method is deployed to carry out the numerical simulation. Inthis capacity, Newton's equations of motion are computed by means of Brenner'ssecond-generation bond order (REBO) function [ 14 ] for the set of atoms which are covalently bonded. The REBO potentialis able to accurately describe the properties of solid-state and molecularcarbon nanostructures [ 15 , 16 ] while maintaining the accuracies of the ab initio andsemi-empirical methods in simulating large systems [ 1521 ]. The mathematical form of the potential equations is defined as

EREBO=VRrijbijVArij,

where V R ( r ij ) and V A ( r ij ) are the repulsive and attractive pair terms and b ij term is used to include the reactive empirical bond order between theatoms.

The MD simulation procedure described here is similar to our previous work as canbe seen in [ 15 ]. The tensile loading procedure of HFG sheet is shown inFigure  1 . As an illustration, the morphologicalcharacteristics of the HFG sheet of length 100 Å under tension isdepicted in Figure  2 . The data hence generated by ourMD simulation agrees very well with the literature [ 15 , 20 ], and hence, we can validate the reliability of our MD simulation.

Figure 1

Mechanism of tensile loading in an HFG sheet by MD simulation [ 15 ] . Atoms inside the red rectangle are subjected tooutward displacement to affect tensile loading.

Figure 2

Tensile loading applied on an HFG sheet [ 15 ] . The graphene sheet maintains its stable shape (a) when no load is applied, further application of tensileload results in breaking and fragmentation as shown in (b) .

Methods

The data obtained by the MD simulation are shown in Tables  1 and 2 which represent the data for trainingand testing samples, respectively. The main inputs considered in our study arethe percentage of hydrogen functionalization and simulation temperature. Theoutput of our study is the tensile strength of HFG. In order to explicitly testthe extrapolation capability of method, 20 samples are used for training and 11are used for testing. Training samples consist of values of tensile strength attemperatures of 0 and 300 K, whereas testing samples consist of values oftemperature at 600 K.

Table 1

Data for training obtained by MD simulation

Temperature (K)

Percentage of hydrogen functionalization

Tensile strength (GPa)

0

0

157

0

0.1

135

0

0.2

123

0

0.3

109

0

0.4

92

0

0.5

85

0

0.6

82

0

0.7

83

0

0.8

85

0

0.9

81

0

1

87

300

0

101

300

0.1

72

300

0.2

63

300

0.3

52

300

0.4

43

300

0.5

39

300

0.6

34

300

0.7

35

300

0.8

35

300

0.9

41

300

1

43

Table 2

Data for testing obtained by MD simulation

Temperature (K)

Percentage of hydrogen functionalization

Tensile strength (GPa)

600

0

51

600

0.1

35

600

0.2

32

600

0.3

25

600

0.4

20

600

0.5

19

600

0.6

15

600

0.7

18

600

0.8

18

600

0.9

21

600

1

22

Nanoscale material modeling by ANN approach

In this paper, we proposed ANN approach. In this approach, data obtained from MDis fed into the paradigm of ANN for training of network. ANN network consist ofthree layers: input, hidden, and output layers. Input layer consist of twoneurons since there are two inputs [ 2231 ]. The number of neurons in the hidden layer is chosen based ontrial-and-error method. The output layer comprise of single neuron, i.e., outputof the system. The neurons of one layer to the neurons of pre-and-after layerare connected through weighted links.

Weights are initialized and are multiplied by input values specified by eachneuron. The neuron estimate summation of weighted inputs and passes it to thetransfer function ( A ) which produces an output Y p .

Yp=Ai=0n1wixiδ,

where w i is weight, x i is the i th input variable, and δ is the thresholdor offset of the neuron. The activation function used is sigmoid logisticfunction given by

Ax=11+ex.

The difference between the output value of network and actual value for a sample i is given by

Errorm=12m=1MAciMi2,

where Ac i and M i are actual and predicted values for i th sample, respectively,and M is the number of neurons in the output of network. The averageerror for the whole network is given by

Errorm=12m=1Mm=1MAciMi2,

where N is the total number of samples. The Levenberg-Marquardtalgorithm [ 32 ] that works on the principle of the second derivative is used tooptimize the Error p . The simpler form of Hessian matrix is used and the algorithm iteratesweights using formulae

xk+1=xkJTJ+μI1JTe,

where j is the Jacobian matrix that consists of the first derivatives ofthe network errors, e is a vector of network errors, μ isthe learning rate, and I is the identity matrix. The weights areupdated by LMA until the threshold error is achieved. The computation of weightsis iterative and it consumes time.

In the present work, feed-forward network of three layers is implemented inMATLAB R2010b. The number of neurons in hidden layer is determined based on theminimum value of root-mean-square error (RMSE) of the model on the training dataset. A trial-and-error approach is adopted to select the number of neurons inthe hidden layers. It was found that for number of neurons six, the RMSE isminimum, and therefore, the ANN model with single hidden layer of six neurons isselected. The performance of the selected ANN model is discussed in the‘Performance comparison of proposed approach’ section.

Results and discussion

The predictions obtained from the proposed approach is compared to thosegenerated using MD simulations based on square of correlation coefficient( R 2 ) given by

R2=i=1nAiA¯iMiM¯ii=1nAiA¯i2i=1nMiM¯i2,

where M i and A i are predicted and actual values, respectively, M¯i and A¯i are the average values of predicted and actual, respectively,and n is number of training samples.

The results obtained from the simulation studies and predicted by using proposedapproach on training and testing data is shown in Figures  3 and 4 , respectively. The graph shown inFigure  3 indicates that the proposed approach hasimpressively well learned the non-linear relationship between the input andoutput process parameters with high correlation values. The result of testingphase shown in Figure  4 indicates that the valuespredicted by MD-ANN approach are well in agreement with the simulatedvalues.

Figure 3

Comparison between predicted values and simulated values on trainingdata.

Figure 4

Comparison between predicted values and simulated values on testingdata.

Conclusion

The performance of the proposed MD-ANN approach is evaluated in the‘Performance comparison of proposed approach’ section. The resultsconclude that the MD-ANN model have shown excellent generalization ability withhigh statistical values of R 2 on testing data. The high generalization ability of the MD-ANNmodel is beneficial for MD experts who are currently looking for high fidelitymodels that predict the tensile strength of graphene under uncertain inputprocess conditions, and therefore, the cost of having to run additional MDsimulations can be avoided. The model can be used offline for prediction and canbe further optimized to determine the optimum input process parameters thatmaximize the tensile strength of nanomaterials.


Acknowledgements

VV and AG gratefully acknowledge the financial support in form of scholarshipprovided by the School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, NanyangTechnological University, Singapore.


Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


Authors' contributions

VV carried out preliminary simulations to confirm that data generated confirm toliterature and is supervised by CHW. AG carried out the computational simulationsdesigned and formulated by YB and is supervised by KT. All authors read and approvedthe final manuscript.


References

  1. Lee et al. (2008) Measurement of the elastic properties and intrinsic strength of monolayergraphene 321(5887) (pp. 385-388) 10.1126/science.1157996
  2. Balandin et al. (2008) Superior thermal conductivity of single-layer graphene 8(3) (pp. 902-907) 10.1021/nl0731872
  3. Williams et al. (2007) Quantum hall effect in a gate-controlled p-n junction of graphene 317(5838) (pp. 638-641) 10.1126/science.1144657
  4. Novoselov et al. (2004) Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films 306(5696) (pp. 666-669) 10.1126/science.1102896
  5. Geim (2009) Graphene: status and prospects 324(5934) (pp. 1530-1534) 10.1126/science.1158877
  6. Standley et al. (2008) Graphene-based atomic-scale switches 8(10) (pp. 3345-3349) 10.1021/nl801774a
  7. Kordon et al. (2006) Application issues of genetic programming in industry (pp. 241-258) 10.1007/0-387-28111-8_16
  8. Reihanian et al. (2011) Application of neural network and genetic algorithm to powder metallurgy ofpure iron 32(6) (pp. 3183-3188) 10.1016/j.matdes.2011.02.049
  9. Ramanan et al. (2011) An artificial neural network based heuristic for flow shop schedulingproblems 22(2) (pp. 279-288) 10.1007/s10845-009-0287-5
  10. Liao et al. (2011) An artificial neural network for groutability prediction of permeationgrouting with microfine cement grouts 38(8) (pp. 978-986) 10.1016/j.compgeo.2011.07.008
  11. Garg and Tai (2013) Comparison of statistical and machine learning methods in modelling of datawith multicollinearity 18(4) (pp. 295-312) 10.1504/IJMIC.2013.053535
  12. Garcia-Mateo et al. (2007) Artificial neural network modeling for the prediction of criticaltransformation temperatures in steels 42(14) (pp. 5391-5397) 10.1007/s10853-006-0881-2
  13. Garg A, Tai K, Lee CH, Savalani MM: A hybrid M5’-genetic programming approach for ensuring greatertrustworthiness of prediction ability in modelling of FDM process. J Intell Manufactur doi: 10.1007/s10845–013–0734–1 doi: 10.1007/s10845-013-0734-1
  14. Brenner et al. (2002) A second-generation reactive empirical bond order (REBO) potential energyexpression for hydrocarbons 14(4) (pp. 783-802) 10.1088/0953-8984/14/4/312
  15. Wong and Vijayaraghavan (2012) Nanomechanics of free form and water submerged single layer graphene sheetunder axial tension by using molecular dynamics simulation (pp. 420-428) 10.1016/j.msea.2012.07.008
  16. Wong and Vijayaraghavan (2012) Nanomechanics of imperfectly straight single walled carbon nanotubes underaxial compression by using molecular dynamics simulation 53(1) (pp. 268-277) 10.1016/j.commatsci.2011.08.011
  17. Vijayaraghavan and Wong (2013) Nanomechanics of single walled carbon nanotube with water interactions underaxial tension by using molecular dynamics simulation 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.013
  18. Vijayaraghavan V, Wong CH: Shear deformation characteristics of single walled carbon nanotube with waterinteractions by using molecular dynamics simulation. Physica E Low-Dimensional Sys Nanostructures doi:/10.1016/j.physe.2013.06.025 doi:/10.1016/j.physe.2013.06.025
  19. Vijayaraghavan and Wong (2013) Temperature, defect and size effect on the elastic properties of imperfectlystraight carbon nanotubes by using molecular dynamics simulation (pp. 184-191) 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.12.025
  20. Vijayaraghavan and Wong (2012) Tensile loading characteristics of free-form and water submerged single layergraphene sheet
  21. Wong CH, Vijayaraghavan V: Nanomechanics of nonideal single- and double-walled carbon nanotubes. J Nanomaterials doi: 10.1155/2012/490872 doi: 10.1155/2012/490872
  22. Garg A, Rachmawati L, Tai K: Classification-driven model selection approach of genetic programming inmodelling of turning process. Int J Advanced Manufactur Technol doi: 10.1007/s00170–013–5103-x doi: 10.1007/s00170-013-5103-x
  23. Garg A, Savalani MM, Tai K: State-of-the-Art in empirical modeling of rapid prototyping processes. Rapid Prototyping J in press in press
  24. Garg and Tai (2011) A hybrid genetic programming–artificial neural network approach formodeling of vibratory finishing process (pp. 14-19)
  25. Garg and Tai (2012) Proceedings of 2012 International Conference on Modelling,Identification and Control (ICMIC 2012)
  26. Benyelloul and Aourag (2013) (pp. 353-358)
  27. Garg et al. (2013) Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Conference on ComputationalIntelligence for Financial Engineering & Economics (CIFEr)
  28. Garg and Tai (2013) Proceedings of 2013 IEEE Symposium Series on ComputationalIntelligence and Data mining (CIDM)
  29. Garg et al. (2013) Review of empirical modeling techniques for modeling of turning process 20(2) (pp. 121-129) 10.1504/IJMIC.2013.056184
  30. Esmailzadeh and Aghaie-Khafri (2012) (pp. 127-133)
  31. Garg et al. (2013) Performance evaluation of microbial fuel cell by artificial intelligencemethods
  32. Cherkassky and Ma (2003) Comparison of model selection for regression 15(7) (pp. 1691-1714) 10.1162/089976603321891864