Synthesis of PPy–silver nanocomposites via in situ oxidative polymerization

Materials

Pyrrole monomer obtained from Merck and was purified in low pressure before using. Ammonium peroxydisulfate (APS), p -toluenesulfonic acid ( p -TSA), silver nitrate (AgNO ₃ ), tributyl phosphate (TBP) and polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) were purchased from Merck and were used as received. All other chemicals and solvents were from analytical grade and were used without any further purification.

Synthesis of hydrophobic silver nanoparticles

SNPs were synthesised according to the following procedure: 1.9 g of PVP was introduced into the container, then 25 ml TBP added and disturbed at room temperature. Then, 0.015 g of silver nitrate was led into the solution. After PVP was dissolved into the TBP. The color of the solution extended within the reaction procedure, from colorless, light yellow, yellow, to orange. The reaction continued for 3 h before a stable solution with nano-silver colloids were attained. The equipped nano-silver/TBP/PVP colloid solution was varied and stirred strongly with 30 ml of deionized water for 45 min before the mixture was divided into two phases: the highest sheet was colorless oil phase, whereas the lowest layer was orange water phase, and hydrophobic nano-silver particles were transferred from TBP into water.

Synthesis of PPy–silver nanocomposites

The nanocomposites of PPy–silver were synthesized via in situ chemical oxidation polymerization. APS and PTSA were used as initiator and pyrrole surfactant dopant, respectively, during polymerization. In a typical process, 6.4 g (0.03 mol) of APS was solved in the 150 ml distilled water and agitated for 15 min. A solution of PTSA in water [5.3 g (0.03 mol) of PTSA in 50 ml water] was introduced into the aqueous solution of APS and mixed for 10 min. Two milliliter (0.03 mol) of pyrrole was added to the 50 ml water and then 0.02 g of SNPs added to the pyrrole solution and ultrasonicated to mark pyrrole to be adsorbed on the outward of SNPs for 15 min. Then pyrrole and SNPs solution was added slowly to the streak covering to APS/PTSA solution. The blend was stirred for about 5 h at room temperature. The black deposit was washed with ethanol and distilled water several times until the filtrate was pale. Then the samples were withered under vacuum at 50 °C for 72 h. Several PPy–silver nanocomposites were prepared with different wt% of SNPs respect to the pyrrole. For assessment, PPy was also synthesized in a similar procedure and used as reference.

Results and discussion

The molecular structures of PPy and PPy–silver nanocomposite were characterized by FT-IR spectroscopy. Figure  ¹ indicates the FT-IR spectra of samples. As can be seen this figure shows peaks located around 1,451 and 1,463 cm ⁻¹ , which correspond to the C–C and C–N stretching vibration in the pyrrole ring, respectively [ ⁵ , ¹⁹ ]. The peaks around 1,189 cm ⁻¹ correspond to the breathing vibration of the pyrrole ring and the peaks near 1,303, 1,024 and 922 cm ⁻¹ can be assigned to the C–H in and out-of-plane deformation vibration, respectively [ ¹ ]. Indeed, the characteristic absorption bands at 1,451, 1,463, 1,189, 1,303, 1,024 and 922 and 765 cm ⁻¹ are assigned to the vibration of the typical PPy aromatic rings [ ²⁰ ]. When the peaks were compared to the pure PPy, it can be found that the peaks position of the PPy–silver nanocomposites have a little shift to high wavenumber. It was due to the compound between PPy and silver. Also, it could be recognized to the amplified influence of the charge-transfer effect between the polymer chains of PPy and SNPs [ ¹ ].

Fig. 1

TGA of PPy and PPy–silver nanocomposites was carried out in the temperature range 25–625 °C. Figure  ² illustrates the TGA diagrams as can be seen, three steps of weight loss occurs during the TGA of samples. The first step of weight loss is occurred at 50–180 °C, which may be due to humidity loss, it is about 10 % weight loss. A slight weight loss happens before 190 °C due to the decomposition of oligomers molecules [ ⁷ , ¹³ , ²¹ ]. The second step of weight loss that occurs between 200 and 400 °C attributed to the loss of surfactant dopant. The third step of weight loss over the temperature range 400–625 °C is due to the thermal decomposition of PPy into a number of chemical forms. About 40 % weight loss occurs at 625 °C for pure PPy. Thermal permanency of nanocomposites grows somewhat with growing SNPs weight percent. Though, improvement of thermal stability is not momentous, owing to low weight percent of SNPs [ ¹³ ].

Fig. 2

XRD patterns of PPy–silver nanocomposites confirmed the combination of SNPs in the PPy matrix as shown in Fig.  ³ . The general peak with 2 θ around 23.3° is related to the diffraction of amorphous PPy [ ¹ , ¹⁹ , ²² ]. Another sharp diffraction peaks at 2 θ values of 32.4◦, 38.2◦ and 45.6 corresponded to Bragg’s reflections from the (1 1 1), (2 0 0), (2 2 0) planes of silver and were in good treaty with the reported data [ ¹ , ²² – ²⁴ ]. This result recommends that the silver cores in the PPy–silver nanocomposites are in FCC phase. From the XRD patterns, existence of SNPs in PPy matrix was established, which is consistent with the result of the TEM. As a result, all of the above experimental clarifications strongly established that the PPy–silver nanocomposites are successfully formed.

Fig. 3

Figure  ⁴ shows the FESEM micrograph of PPy–silver nanocomposite with pure PPy (a) and PPy–10 % silver (b). As shown by the images, PPy exhibits a routinely cauliflower-like (a) [ ¹⁵ ]. The particle size of PPy was around 140–320 nm by way of orbicular morphology. This value size is stable reported by other researchers [ ¹ , ² , ²⁵ , ²⁶ ]. While, as mention above, XRD configurations specify the existence of silver in the nanocomposite with the size of about 50 nm, the silver are also obscure by means of FESEM images. As can be seen from Fig.  ⁴ b, the particle size of PPy are smaller than that of pure PPy, it seems that SPNs improve stability of PPy particles, this may affect the morphology of PPy particles. Also, it indicates both almost spherical group particles and some bulk morphology [ ²² ]. Therefore, the FESEM results clarify the existence of silver in PPy particles.

Fig. 4

TEM micrograph of the PPy–silver (10 %) nanocomposite shown in Fig.  ⁵ . In this figure the black spots presents SNPs and the grey background seems to be PPy. It is clear that SNPs are not ideally spherical, and their mean diameter is in the range of 40–70 nm. Considering both TEM micrographs and corresponding XRD patterns one can say that SNPs is dispersed in the polypyrrole matrix with a little aggregation. However, the extent of dispersion is not homogeneous in the matrix this phenomenon has reported for other nanoparticles in PPy such as Au [ ¹⁸ ].

Fig. 5

Electrical conductivity

For measuring electrical conductivity, PPy and PPy–silver nanocomposites were pushed into cylinder pellet form under 15 MPa. Then, the conductivity at room temperature was measured by a DC voltage/current indicator with four-probe standard method [ ¹⁷ ]. The data are shown at Fig.  ⁶ . These data are the average value of four measurements. The conductivity of the PPy–silver nanocomposites was increased by growing the percentage of SNPs compared to that of pure PPy. The structure of the PPy–silver nanocomposites is likely to contribute to its improved electrical conductivity in the following ways [ ²⁷ ]. First, SNPs may use as conducting bridge connecting PPy conducting spheres and increasing the active saturation. Second, in accordance with the FT-IR observations, conductivity results suggested that the interaction between PPy and silver could be responsible for higher conducting than the preliminary constituents. However, the electrical conductivity of PPy–silver nanocomposites (4.9 S m ⁻¹ for silver:PPy = 1:10) was slightly decreased with the increase of the feeding mass ratio of pyrrole to silver [ ²⁴ , ²⁷ ].

Fig. 6