Convenient, efficient, and green method for synthesis of bis(indolyl)methanes with nano SIO2 under ultrasonic irradiation

Abstract

A green and efficient procedure for the preparation of bis (indolyl)methanes via the condensation of indoles with various carbonyl compounds in the presence of catalytic amount of nanosilica gel under ultrasonic irradiation in good to excellent yields (83% to 94% ) in solvent-free condition is described. Short reaction time, easy and quick isolation of the products, environmentally friendly procedure, excellent chemoselectivity, and excellent yields are the main advantages of this procedure. Native nanosilica gel was used as an inexpensive and readily available catalyst without any support of reagent or modification on it. The reaction is carried out in solvent-free condition in the absence of ultrasonic irradiation at 80°C, too. This methodology offers significant improvements for the synthesis of bis (indolyl)methanes with regard to the yield of products, simplicity in operation, and green aspects by avoiding toxic catalysts and solvents. Recovery and recycling of the silica nanoparticle catalyst were also described.


Background

Recently, the applications of nanoparticles (NPs) in catalysis have attracted considerable attention because of their improved efficiency and facile reaction conditions [ 1 , 2 ]. These materials have enormously large and highly reactive surface area, so these materials exhibit some unique properties in comparison to bulk materials. Because of individual property of silica-based NPs compared to others, it has been well studied. Silica NPs are easily prepared in room temperature, and their sizes can be easily tuned. On the other hand, silica NPs are stable in organic solvent and are environmentally friendly materials [ 312 ].

The ultrasonic irradiation is applicable to a broad range of practical syntheses. Some advantages of ultrasound procedure are short reaction times, mild reaction conditions, formation of purer products, and waste minimization. Ultrasonic irradiation can also be used to influence selectivity and yields of reactions [ 1315 ]. Despite the vast advantages of this technique, the use of ultrasound in the synthesis of organic compounds is not fully developed. To develop the application of ultrasound in organic reaction, herein, we wish to describe the reaction of indoles with aldehydes in the presence of a catalytic amount of native silica gel nanoparticles under ultrasonic irradiation (Scheme  1 ).

Scheme 1

Reaction of indoles with aldehydes in the presence of a catalytic amount of native silica gel nanoparticles.

Bis (indolyl)methanes, indole, and their derivatives are known as important intermediates in organic synthesis and pharmaceutical chemistry, and exhibit various physiological properties [ 16 ]. Bis (indolyl)methanes are found in cruciferous plants and are known to promote beneficial estrogen metabolism [ 17 ] and induce apoptosis in human cancer cells. Therefore, there is great interest in the synthesis of these compounds [ 1821 ]. Synthetically, the reaction of indole with aldehydes or ketones produces azafulvenium salts that react further with a second indole molecule to form bis (indol-3-yl)methanes [ 22 ]. In recent years, syntheses of this class of molecules under mild conditions have been reported, with promoters such as montmorillonite clay K-10 [ 23 , 24 ], trichloro-1,3,5-triazine [ 25 ], AlPW 12 O 40 [ 26 ], sodium dodecyl sulfate [ 27 ], ZrCl 4 [ 28 ], I 2 [ 29 ], In(OTf) 3 /ionic liquid [ 30 ], CuBr 2 [ 31 ], MW/Lewis acids (FeCl 3 , BiCl 3 , InCl 3 , ZnCl 2 , CoCl 2 ) [ 32 ], NaHSO 4 and Amberlyst-15 [ 33 ], silica sulfuric acid [ 34 ], metal hydrogen sulfates [ 35 ], NaHSO 4 /ionic liquid [ 36 ], CAN [ 37 ], NBS [ 38 ], and Ph 3 CCl [ 39 ]. However, most of the existing methods involve toxic metal ions and solvents, have high costs, use corrosive reagents, and have cumbersome work-up procedures. Consequently, new procedures that address these drawbacks are desirable.

Methods

Materials and apparatus

All chemicals were purchased from Nanostructured & Amorphous Materials, Inc. (nano SiO 2 15 nm; TX, USA), Sigma-Aldrich Co. (MO, USA), or Merck & Co., Inc (NJ, USA) chemical companies and used without further purification. Products were characterized by comparing their spectral (IR, 1 HNMR, and TLC) and physical data (m.p. and b.p.) with those of authentic samples. Infrared spectra were recorded on a WQF-510 FTIR spectrometer (Rayleigh Instruments Ltd., Essex, England). 1 H NMR spectra were recorded with a DRX-500 AVANCE spectrometer (Bruker Corporation, MA, USA) at 500 MHz ( 1 H) in CDCl 3 or DMSO- d 6 as the solvent and tetramethyl silaneas internal reference. Melting points were measured with Electrothermal 9300 (Electrothermal, Essex, UK). Soltec Sonica Mod 3200 ETH ultrasonic cleaner bath (Soltec S.r.l., Milan, Italy) was used for ultrasonic irradiation. The reaction vessel placed inside the ultrasonic bath contained water.

General procedure

A mixture of indole (1 mmol), aldehyde (2 mmol), and silica NPs (20 mol%) was mixed and added some drop of diethyl ether to it. Further, the reaction mass was irradiated under ultrasonic irradiation at 80°C for appropriate time (Table  1 ). The progress of reaction was monitored by TLC. After the completion of reaction, the colored product obtained was recrystallized from ethanol and filtered to get the pure product.

Table 1

Synthesis of bis (indolyl)methanes by the reaction of indole with aldehydes in the presence of silica NPs in solvent-free condition

Entry

Aldehyde

Product

Time (min)

Yield (%)a

MP (°C)

Found

Literature

1

60

93

120 to 123

124 [40]

2

60

92

93 to 95

96 [41]

3

75

94

76 to 77

78 [42]

4

90

87

217 to 221

220 [42]

5

75

89

186 to 189

189 [42]

6

120

83

69 to 71

68 [40]

7

-

120

-

-

a Isolated yields.

Results and discussion

The methodology developed is simple with high to excellent yields. We first compared the catalyst effect on different solvents for synthesis of bis (indol-3-yl)methanes using native silica NPs, and the results are summarized in Table  2 .

Table 2

Optimization of solvent effect on the model reaction

Entry

Solvent

Ultrasonic irradiation

Reflux condition

Time (min)

Yield (%)

Time (min)

Yield (%)

1

CHCl3

120

-

120

-

2

CH2Cl2

120

-

120

-

3

CH3CH2OH

120

Trace

120

Trace

4

CH3CN

120

Trace

120

Trace

5

THF

120

-

120

-

6

Toluene

120

-

120

-

7

Without solventa

60

93

90

90

a In solvent-free condition at 80°C.

In a typical experiment, the reaction of indole and benzaldehyde in solvent or solvent-free condition was carried in the presence of silica NPs to afford the corresponding bis (indol-3-yl)methanes. We kept the catalyst concentration constant and used different solvents like dichloromethane, chloroform, toluene acetonitrile, THF, ethanol, and acetonitrile which afforded lower yields. We have also studied the sonochemical effect on model reaction using different solvents. In all cases, the experimental results show that the yields of the products are very low under sonication. Using lower amount of catalyst resulted in lower yields, while higher amount of catalyst did not affect the reaction times and yields, and in the absence of catalyst, the yield of the product was not found. The best results were obtained using 20 mol% of catalyst (Table  2 , entry 7). Based on the results of this study, it seems that the reaction times and yields will improve in the solvent-free condition under ultrasound irradiation. The obtained results are summarized in Table  2 , entries 1 to 7. These results suggest that the absence of solvent is the best condition for synthesis of bis (indol-3-yl)methanes. Furthermore, the effect of catalyst load on reaction time and yield is explored in Table  3 .

Table 3

Screening of catalyst concentration on model reaction

Entry

Catalysis (%)

Yield (%)a

1

-

-

2

2

Trace

3

5

36

4

10

78

5

15

88

6

20

93

7

30

94

The model reaction of benzaldehyde with indole in the presence of silica NPs (20 mol%) in solvent-free condition under ultrasonic waves for 60 min. a Isolated yield.

The best result is obtained with 20 mol% of the catalyst. After optimizing the conditions, the generality of this method was examined by the reaction of several substituted aryl aldehydes with indole. The results are shown in Table  1 . The products were isolated and identified by melting point, NMR, and IR (Scheme  1 ).

Conclusion

Silica NPs in solvent-free condition were found to be selective and effective catalysts in green synthesis of bis (indolyl)methanes under ultrasonic irradiation. This catalyst provides clean conversion; greater selectivity and easy work-up make this protocol practical and economically attractive.


Acknowledgment

Financial support from the Islamic Azad University of Kermanshah is gratefully acknowledged.


Competing interests

The author(s) did not provide this information.


Authors’ contributions

The author(s) did not provide this information.


References

  1. Beletskaya and Cheprakov (2000) 10.1021/cr9903048
  2. Astruc et al. (2005) 10.1002/anie.200500766
  3. Ramazani et al. (2011) (pp. 1831-1837) 10.1002/hlca.201100076
  4. Ramazani and Mahyari (2010) (pp. 2203-2209) 10.1002/hlca.201000124
  5. Ramazani et al. (2011) (pp. 611-622) 10.1002/hlca.201000280
  6. Banerjee et al. (2011) (pp. 1878-1881) 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.02.031
  7. Banerjee et al. (2009) (pp. 124-127) 10.1016/j.tetlet.2008.10.110
  8. Banerjee and Santra (2009) (pp. 2037-2040) 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.01.154
  9. Badr et al. (2008) (pp. 245-253) 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.10.020
  10. Banerjee and Sereda (2009) (pp. 6959-6962) 10.1016/j.tetlet.2009.09.137
  11. Sreedhar et al. (2007) (pp. 159-163) 10.1016/j.molcata.2007.03.040
  12. Haghnazari et al. (2011) (pp. 30-33)
  13. Sinha et al. (2007) 10.1071/CH06380
  14. Sinha et al. (2007) 10.1016/j.tet.2006.11.023
  15. Kumar et al. (2007) 10.1016/j.tet.2007.07.018
  16. Sundberg (1996) Academic
  17. Zeligs (1998) 10.1089/jmf.1998.1.67
  18. Chakrabarty et al. (2002) 10.1016/S0040-4039(02)00682-2
  19. Bandgar and Shaikh (2003)
  20. Wang and Chen (2007) 10.1002/jccs.200700194
  21. Reddy et al. (2003) 10.1081/SCC-120025177
  22. Remers and Houlihan (1972) Interscience Publishers
  23. Maiti and Bhattacharyya (1997)
  24. Chakrabarty et al. (2004) 10.1081/SCC-120027281
  25. Sharma et al. (2004) 10.1016/j.tetlet.2004.08.084
  26. Firouzabadi et al. (2005) 10.1016/j.molcata.2005.09.005
  27. Deb and Bhuyan (2006) 10.1016/j.tetlet.2005.12.093
  28. Zhang et al. (2005)
  29. Ji et al. (2004) 10.1016/j.tet.2003.12.060
  30. Ji et al. (2003)
  31. Mo et al. (2005) 10.1081/SCC-200066653
  32. Xia et al. (2004) 10.1081/SCC-200028611
  33. Ramesh et al. (2003) 10.1002/adsc.200303022
  34. Pore et al. (2006)
  35. Niknam et al. (2006) 10.1007/BF03245953
  36. Zhang et al. (2006)
  37. Ramesh et al. (2003)
  38. Koshima and Matsuaka (2002)
  39. Khalafi-Nezhad et al. (2008)
  40. Nagawade and Shide (2005)
  41. Sadaphal et al. (2008) 10.2478/s11532-008-0069-5
  42. Sadaphal et al. (2008) 10.1080/17518250802637819