Findings
Background
Over the last decade, there has been significant research activity in the area of terahertz (THz) radiation generation and detection. The THz region of the electromagnetic spectrum lies in the gap between microwaves and infrared with a frequency range of 0.1 to 10 THz and corresponding wavelength range of 30 to 3,000 μm. THz radiations have applications in defense, medical imaging, sensors, spectroscopy, etc. THz radiations can be generated via several mechanisms, viz. optical rectification of a short pulse laser or a surface plasma wave, photoconduction, Cherenkov radiation, etc.[ 1 – 9 ]. Presently, there is an increased interest in employing metallic nanostructures and carbon nanotubes to generate THz radiations as these structures offer the advantage of compactness with reasonable efficiency. A metallic nanostructured surface has been employed by Welsh and Wyne[ 10 ] to generate ultrafast THz radiation pulses via excitation of surface plasmon. Garwe et al.[ 11 ] have observed THz radiations on either side of a gold-coated nanograting (500 nm), employing a 785-mm, 150-ps, 1-KHz Ti:sapphire laser. Studies on nanoscale periodic arrays of rectangular-shaped holes revealed band formation of THz nanoresonators[ 12 ]. Nemilentsau et al.[ 13 ] have investigated the application of a finite-length isolated carbon nanotube as a thermal nanoscale antenna in THz range. Batrakev et al.[ 14 ] and Portnoi et al.[ 15 ] have given elegant reviews of terahertz processes in carbon nanotubes. Another promising scheme of THz radiation generation is by exploiting excellent metallic properties of carbon nanotubes[ 16 ]. Wang and Wu[ 17 ] have experimentally studied the properties of THz radiation pulses emitted by a metallic, large-aspect ratio carbon nanotube antenna. Ramakrishnan et al.[ 18 ] have observed generation of a sub-picosecond THz pulse by illuminating a graphite surface with femtosecond infrared laser pulses. Dragoman and Dragoman[ 19 ] have given the physical model and simulation results of semiconducting carbon nanotube resonant-tunneling diodes for THz radiation generation. Zhao et al.[ 19 ] have studied the characteristics of metallic, single-walled carbon nanotubes as THz antenna. Wang et al.[ 20 ] have observed antenna-like effect in an array of aligned carbon nanotubes. Dagher et al.[ 21 ] have studied amplification of radiation in metallic carbon nanotubes under the influence of a d.c. magnetic field. Parashar and Sharma[ 22 ] have studied THz radiation generation via optical rectification of a laser in an array of carbon nanotubes. In this work, we extend their work to study the effect of static magnetic field on THz radiation generation from an array of carbon nanotubes. An amplitude-modulated laser interacts with an array of cylindrical carbon nanotubes. The laser exerts a ponderomotive force on the free electrons on the nanotubes, inducing on them a current at twice the modulation frequency. The image charges in the metallic base constitute a supplementary array with currents out of phase by π with respect to the primary array. These oscillating nanotube arrays act as antennas to produce THz radiation.
Analysis
Consider a metal surface (
x
= 0), embedded with normally mounted carbon nanotubes of radius
r
c
, length
ℓ
c
Schematic of process.Figure 1
An amplitude-modulated laser is impinged on the nanotube array with electric and magnetic fields
where k = ω / c , μ is the modulation index of laser, and Ω is in terahertz range.
There also exists a static magnetic field given by
Under the influence of electric field, the electrons of nanotubes are displaced by a distance
Δ
, and the displacement is governed by the equation of motion
Here, ω p = ( n o e 2 / m ε 0 ) 1/2 is the plasma frequency of electrons in a nanotube, −e and m are the charge and effective mass of the electron, ε 0 is the free space permittivity, and ε L is the relative permittivity of the lattice.
The
x
and
y
components of the equation of motion can be written as
and
where
Here, it is to be mentioned that the restoring force due to the displacement of the electron cloud of nanotubes is finite for the field perpendicular to the nanotube axis and zero for the field along the axis.
On simplifying Equations
5
and
6
, we obtain the
x
and
y
components for the displacement of the electron cloud as
and
respectively.
The electron velocity can be written as
The laser exerts a ponderomotive force on electrons at the modulation frequency
The oscillatory velocity of electrons due to the ponderomotive force following Equation
5
can be written as
The current density at Ω can be written as
where
As the base of the carbon nanotube is metallic, there will be an image current density underneath the metal surface,
Let the y and z dimensions of the array be L × L .
The vector potential at a far point due to the current distributions is
where
where
On carrying out integration,
I
1
and
I
2
reduce to
and
respectively.
From Equations
17
and
18
, we obtain
The magnetic field at far distance is
The time-average Poynting vector using Equation
20
can be written as
In Figure
2
, we have shown the variation of |
r
2
S
av
| with
ω
c
/Ω at different values of
θ
for the following set of parameters:
ω
c
/Ω = 20, nanotube radius
r
c
= 25 nm,
μ
= 0.01, inter-nanotube separation
a
= 30 nm, length of nanotube
ℓ
c
= 500 nm[
20
],
n
0
= 10
21
cm
−3
,
φ
=1 rad,
ε
L
= 16,
L
×
L
= 2 × 2 cm, and
eA
L
/
mωc
= 0.03. The efficiency of the generated THz power shows a maximum near
θ
= 1 rad. The efficiency increases with magnetic field strength, and for the above-mentioned parameters,
ω
c
/Ω = 0.1 corresponds to a magnetic field strength of 100 kG. The above parameter of
eA
L
/
mωc
= 0.03 can be realized using a Nd:YAG laser of 1.06 μm with an intensity of 10
15
W/cm
2
. In Figure
3
, we have shown the variation of |
r
2
S
av
| with
ω
c
/Ω at different values of
φ
for
θ
= 1 rad. The other parameters are similar to those of Figure
2
. The power radiated shows oscillatory behavior with
φ
.
Variation of
|
r
2
S
av
|
with
ω
c
/Ω at different values of
θ
for different parameters.
The parameters are as follows:
ω
c
/Ω = 20,
r
c
= 25 nm,
μ
= 0.01, inter-nanotube separation
a
= 30 nm,
ℓ
c
= 500 nm,
n
0
= 10
21
cm
−3
,
ϕ
= 1 rad,
ε
L
= 16,
L
×
L
= 2 × 2cm,
eA
L
/
mωc
= 0.03. Variation of
|
r
2
S
av
|
with
ω
c
/Ω at different values of φ for θ = 1 rad. Other parameters are similar to those of Figure
2
.Figure 2
Figure 3
