Biosynthesis and characterization of zinc, magnesium and titanium nanoparticles: an eco-friendly approach

Abstract

In the present study, zinc (Zn), magnesium (Mg) and titanium (Ti) nanoparticles synthesized using fungus by employing various precursor salts of sulfate salts, nitrate salts, chloride salts and oxide salts. To access the nanoparticle production potential, over a hundreds of fungi were isolated from the soil and tested with precursor salts of the Zn, Mg and Ti. Out of which, only 14 fungal isolates were identified, having potential to reduce metal salt into metal nanoparticles. Upon molecular identification, six were identified as Aspergillus flavus , two each as Aspergillus terreus and Aspergillus tubingensis and one each as Aspergillus niger, Rhizoctonia bataticola, Aspergillus fumigatus, and Aspergillus oryzae. Factors responsible for more production of monodispersed Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles were optimized. It was concluded that 0.01 mM precursor salt concentration, 72 h of incubation at pH 5.5 and temperature 28 °C resulted smaller nanoparticles obtained. The biosynthesized functional Zn and Ti nanoparticles can be stored up to 90 days and Mg nanoparticles up to 105 days in its nanoform. Bio-transformed products were analyzed using valid characterization technique i.e. dynamic light scattering, transmission electron microscopy, atomic force microscopy, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy to confirm size, shape, surface morphology and elemental composition. It was found that the average size of developed nano Zn was 8.2 nm, with surface charge of −5.70 mV and 98 % particles were of Zn metal only. Similarly, the average size of Mg nanoparticles was 6.4 nm with surface charge of −6.66 and 97.4 % Mg metal yield, whereas, Ti nanoparticles size were found in the ranges between 1.5 and 30 nm with surface charge of −6.25 mV and 98.6 % Ti metal yield.


Background

Synthesis of nanoparticles with a wide range of compositions, sizes, and shapes has been demonstrated by various physical, chemical and biological methods. Some of them reported very successful methods for nanoparticle synthesis including laser ablation [ 1 ], ion sputtering [ 2 ] and chemical reduction [ 3 ]. The drawbacks of physical and chemical approaches are enormous consumption of energy to maintain high pressure and temperature used during nanoparticle synthesis process [ 4 ] and various toxic byproducts [ 5 ]. Hence there was an increased demand to develop a high yielding, low cost, non-toxic and monodisperse nanoparticles which leads to turning of more and more researchers to exploit biological systems as possible eco-friendly "nano-factories" [ 6 ]. Biological methods for nanoparticle synthesis would help circumvent many of the detrimental features by enabling synthesis at mild pH, pressure, temperature and at a substantially lower cost [ 7 , 8 ].

Unique characteristics at nano-dimension makes them suitable for multiple applications such as industrial [ 9 ], catalysis [ 10 ], biosensing [ 11 ], drug delivery, molecular diagnostics [ 12 ], solar cell [ 13 ], optoelectronics [ 14 ], cell labeling and imaging [ 15 ], photonic band gap materials, single electron transistors, non-linear optical devices, quantum confinement, soil and crop management [ 16 ], and surface enhanced Raman spectroscopy [ 17 ]. Zinc, a metallic chemical element with ionic state Zn 2+ is an essential trace element necessary for plants, microbes and animals [ 18 ]. Magnesium is an alkaline earth metal with its ionic form Mg 2+ , essential to all living cells, where it plays a crucial role in manipulating important biological polyphosphate compounds like ATP, DNA and RNA. Titanium is a strong, lustrous, corrosion resistant metal. Its common compound, titanium dioxide, is a popular photo-catalyst, and is used in manufacture of pigments. In the present research work attempt was made for zinc, magnesium and titanium nanoparticles biosynthesis using different precursor compounds. Factors for biosynthesis of nanoparticles such as pH, concentration, temperature, reaction time period and stability of biosynthesized nanoparticles were also studied.

Materials and methods

Isolation and screening of fungi for nanoparticle synthesis

The fungi were isolated from arid zone agricultural fields (26°18′N 73°01′E) of Central Arid Zone Research Institute (CAZRI), Jodhpur, India. Each composite soil sample of one gram was serially diluted to 10 −4 and dispensed on to petri-plates containing Rose Bengal agar medium which is especially used for cultivation of fungi. Inoculated plates were incubated at 28 °C for 72 h in a biological oxygen demand (BOD) incubator. Cultures were identified on the basis of morphological and molecular characteristics. Stock cultures were maintained at 4 °C in refrigerator until used. Using an actively growing stock culture, subculture was made and incubated for 72 h at 28 °C, which was used as starter culture for nanoparticle synthesis.

Biosynthesis of zinc, magnesium and titanium nanoparticle

Nanoparticles of Zn, Mg, and Ti were biosynthesized using soil-borne fungi. Each fungus was grown in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 100 mL modified malt extract, glucose, yeast extract, peptone (MGYP) medium, containing 0.3 % malt extract, 1 % sucrose, 0.3 % yeast extract, and 0.5 % peptone. After adjusting the pH of medium to 6.8, the culture was grown with continuous shaking on a rotary shaker (150 rpm) at 28 °C for 72 h. After 72 h, fungal balls of mycelia were separated from the culture broth by centrifugation (4,000 rpm) at 4 °C for 10 min and then the fungal mycelia were washed thrice with sterile distilled water. The harvested fungal biomass (15 g wet weight) was re-suspended in 100 mL sterile Milli-Q-water in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask and again kept on shaker (150 rpm) at 28 °C for 62 h. After incubation, the cell-free filtrate was obtained by spreading the fungal biomass by filtration using membrane filter. Using cell-free filtrate, salt solution of precursor salts ZnO, ZnSO 4 , ZnCl 2 , ZnNO 3 for Zn, MgO, MgSO 4 , MgCl 2 , MgNO 3 for Mg, and TiO 2 rutile, TiO 2 anatase for Ti, was prepared in various concentrations ranging from 1 M to 0.01 mM in Erlenmeyer flasks, 0.1 mM concentration used for all conditions unless specified it. The pH ranges between 4.0 and 8.0 were tested, covering both acid and alkaline range. The entire mixture was put into shaker (150 rpm) at various temperatures of reaction mixture of precursor metal salt and extracellular enzyme was analyzed from 20 to 40 °C with an increment of one and two degree temperature, and the reaction time allowed from 0 to 120 h was set up and observation taken at regular intervals of time. The biotransformation was collected periodically and monitored for characterization.

Characterization and identification of fungus used for nanoparticle production

A number of fungal strains were isolated from soil and screened for nanoparticle production. The molecular identification of potential fungal isolates was carried out on the basis of DNA nucleotide sequencing of 5.8S rRNA gene using universal primers viz., Internal Transcribed Spacer ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCG-3′) and ITS 4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′).

Effect of storage time on nanoparticle stability

To study the stability or monodispersity, biologically synthesized zinc, magnesium, titanium nanoparticles were monitored after zero to 125 days after synthesis. The particle size was checked by DLS technique.

Characterization of nanoparticles

Samples of bio-transformed product of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles were characterized by globally accepted nanostructure characterizations techniques like DLS using particle size analyzer (Beckman DelsaNano C, USA), transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEOL JEM-2100F), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM; Hitchi-S-3400N), atomic force microscopy (AFM; Veeco di CP-II) and Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS; Thermo Noran equipped with TEM) techniques.

Results and discussion

Isolation and screening of fungi for nanoparticle synthesis

In order to access the biosynthesis potentials of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles, more than one hundred fungi were isolated from the soil of agricultural fields of CAZRI, Jodhpur. Initially all the isolated fungi were screened for synthesis of nanoparticles using various precursor salts. Out of which, only 14 fungal isolates (Table  1 ) were found to be proficient in breaking down of macroscale precursor salt particles in the range of nanoscale particles at least at one dimension.

Table 1

Molecular characterization and extra cellular enzymatic protein profile of nanoparticle producing fungi

Fungus

Isolate

NCBI GenBank Accession No.

Nanoparticle produced

Aspergillus flavus

TFR-1

JN 194185

Zn, Mg

Aspergillus flavus

CZR-2

JF 681301

Zn, Mg, Ti

Aspergillus flavus

TFR-7

JQ 675308

Ti

Aspergillus flavus

TFR-10

JQ 675293

Zn, Mg, Ti

Aspergillus flavus

TFR-11

JQ 675294

Zn, Mg, Ti

Aspergillus flavus

TFR-12

JQ 675295

Zn, Mg, Ti

Aspergillus terreus

CZR-1

JF 681300

Zn, Mg, Ti

Aspergillus terreus

TFR-2

JN 194186

Zn, Ti

Aspergillus tubingensis

TFR-3

JN 126255

Mg

Aspergillus tubingensis

TFR-5

JQ 675306

Mg

Aspergillus niger

TFR-4

JQ 675305

Zn, Mg, Ti

Rhizoctonia bataticola

TFR-6

JQ 675307

Zn

Aspergillus fumigatus

TFR-8

JQ 675291

Mg, Zn

Aspergillus oryzae

TFR-9

JQ 675292

Zn, Mg, Ti

Molecular identification of fungi

The genomic DNA of all the 14 fungal isolates grown on potato dextrose broth (PDB) for 7 days was successfully isolated. The purified genomic DNA of each fungal isolate was subjected to PCR amplification of 5.8S rRNA gene region using ITS 1 and ITS 4 primers. Upon gel electrophoresis a single prominent band was obtained. The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified products were subjected to DNA sequencing. The nucleotide sequences were subjected to Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) search of National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI), USA and each fungal isolate was designated up to species level based on the maximum similarity with the GenBank reference sequences. All the 14 novel gene sequences were submitted to NCBI databases and assigned GenBank accession number (Table  1 ). Out of 14 fungal isolates, six were identified as Aspergillus flavus, two each as A. terreus and A. tubingensis , and one each as A. niger, R. bataticola, A. fumigatus and A. oryzae.

Biosynthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles

Cell-free filtrate collected from fungal mycelia was exposed to precursor compound of Zn, Mg and Ti, and the mixture was allowed to react for a period of 72 h. Initially the particle size distribution of Zn, Mg and Ti biosynthesized nanoparticles using DLS analysis was ascertained for intensity distribution (Table  2 ). The results clearly exhibited that, isolates CZR1, TFR2, TFR3, TFR5, TFR8 and TFR12 synthesized nanoparticles and obtained intensity distribution shows average particle size in close vicinity of 50 nm. Although all the selected 14 isolate of fungi showed the intensity distribution of nanoparticles below 100 nm sizes for targeted nanoparticles, the fungal isolate CZR1 was found the best among all the isolates for its potential synthesis of entire targeted nanoparticles, therefore isolate CZR1 was used for further experimentation.

Table 2

Intensity distribution of bio-transformed precursor compound after 72 h of incubation with fungus extracellular protein

Fungal isolate

Nanoparticles

Zn

Mg

Ti

CZR1

51 ± 0.5a

49 ± 0.8

43 ± 0.3

CZR2

84 ± 0.3

96 ± 0.5

91 ± 0.8

TFR1

88 ± 0.6

98 ± 0.3

NF

TFR2

55 ± 0.4

NF

53 ± 0.3

TFR3

NF

48 ± 0.5

NF

TFR4

89 ± 0.4

82 ± 0.3

74 ± 0.8

TFR5

NF

52 ± 0.5

NF

TFR6

92 ± 0.3

NF

NF

TFR7

NF

NF

95 ± 0.5

TFR8

56 ± 0.3

65 ± 0.3

NF

TFR9

94 ± 0.5

73 ± 0.6

84 ± 0.3

TFR10

98 ± 0.8

67 ± 0.2

73 ± 0.6

TFR11

79 ± 0.2

83 ± 0.3

89 ± 0.4

TFR12

88 ± 0.3

64 ± 0.8

56 ± 0.5

NF  no particle found below 100 nm

± Standard errors of mean

a Particle size in nm

Response to various precursor compounds for biosynthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles

The results of performance of various precursor compounds for biosynthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles with regards to average size of nanoparticles, polydispersity index (PDI), and percent nanoparticle yield are presented in Table  3 . Four zinc based precursor compounds were tested and the smallest average nanoparticle size of 30 nm was recorded upon utilization of ZnO by the extracellular enzymes secreted by the fungus with PDI of 0.119 and 100 % conversion of macro precursor compound into nanoparticles. Whereas out of four, magnesium based precursor compound MgO, resulted in production of the smallest nanoparticle of 10 nm with the PDI of 0.236 and 100 % conversion of macro precursor compound into nanoparticles. With regards to two compounds of titanium, TiO 2 (anatase) was found more efficient as compared with TiO 2 (rutile) for obtaining relatively smaller size of nanoparticles.

Table 3

Response to various precursor compounds for biosynthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles

Metal

Precursor compound

Avg. nanoparticle size (nm)

PDIa

% Nanoparticle yield

Zn

Zinc nitrate

46 ± 1.4

0.122

100.0

Zinc chloride

74 ± 0.8

0.784

6.5

Zinc sulfate

88 ± 0.7

1.114

4.1

Zinc oxide

30 ± 0.6

0.119

100.0

Mg

Magnesium nitrate

15 ± 0.3

0.228

100.0

Magnesium chloride

69 ± 1.6

0.987

3.8

Magnesium sulfate

96 ± 2.7

1.418

1.2

Magnesium oxide

10 ± 0.8

0.236

100.0

Ti

TiO2 Rutile

17 ± 0.7

0.274

100.0

TiO2 Anatase

13 ± 0.4

0.261

100.0

± Standard errors of mean

a Polydispersity index

Optimization of salt concentration for nanoparticle production

The results of optimization of salt concentration for biosynthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticle (Table  4 ) exhibited that the formation of nanoparticle below 100 nm increased, in general, with the decrease in concentration of precursor compounds from 1 M to 0.01 mM. The least average nanoparticle size was obtained from oxides of all the three metal precursor compounds. Although the least nanoparticle size was biosynthesized at 0.01 mM concentration for production of Zn nanoparticles from ZnO, Mg nanoparticles from MgO and Ti nanoparticles from TiO 2 (anatase).

Table 4

Optimization of salt concentration for biosynthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles

Metal

Precursor compound

1 M

0.5 M

0.1 M

1 mM

0.5 mM

0.1 mM

0.01 mM

Zn

ZnO

100 ± 0.2a

100 ± 0.3

95 ± 0.3

88 ± 0.2

71 ± 0.2

30 ± 0.1

26 ± 0.2

ZnNO3

100 ± 0.3

100 ± 0.5

100 ± 0.2

97 ± 0.1

76 ± 0.3

46 ± 0.3

43 ± 0.3

ZnSO4

100 ± 0.8

100 ± 0.3

100 ± 0.3

100 ± 0.8

100 ± 0.5

92 ± 0.2

88 ± 0.5

ZnCl2

100 ± 0.5

100 ± 0.5

100 ± 0.8

100 ± 0.3

98 ± 0.2

89 ± 0.8

74 ± 0.3

Mg

MgNO3

100 ± 0.4

100 ± 0.5

92 ± 0.4

83 ± 0.8

54 ± 0.2

15 ± 0.3

12 ± 0.3

MgO

100 ± 0.8

100 ± 0.2

100 ± 0.5

92 ± 0.2

62 ± 0.2

10 ± 0.1

8 ± 0.4

MgSO4

100 ± 0.8

100 ± 0.5

100 ± 0.3

100 ± 0.5

100 ± 0.3

100 ± 0.8

96 ± 2.7

MgCl2

100 ± 0.3

100 ± 0.3

100 ± 0.8

100 ± 0.5

96 ± 0.8

82 ± 0.5

69 ± 1.6

Ti

TiO2 Rutile

100 ± 0.4

100 ± 0.3

98 ± 0.6

84 ± 0.3

48 ± 0.1

15 ± 0.1

13 ± 0.3

TiO2 Anatase

100 ± 0.3

100 ± 0.4

100 ± 0.7

93 ± 0.2

52 ± 0.3

13 ± 0.2

12 ± 0.5

±   Standard errors of mean

a Particle size in nm

Optimization of reaction period for nanoparticle biosynthesis

Based on the previous experimentation on performance of precursor compounds and salt concentration two compounds each of Zn, Mg and Ti metals were exposed to fungal extracellular enzyme secrets. A perusal of data (Table  5 ) revealed that none of the precursor compounds produced nanoparticles up to 24 h of incubation period. The biosynthesis of nanoparticle was detected only after 36 h of incubation onwards, and the reactions in various compound combinations stabilized the size of nanoparticles around 72 h. It was also observed that further incubation beyond 72 h, up to 120 h neither reduced the size of nanoparticles nor was economical to harvest appreciable yields. The results clearly indicated that all the potential precursor compounds of three metals, resulted in best yields of nanoparticles with reduced size at 72 h of incubations. Therefore, for further experimentation, the incubation period was kept at 72 h.

Table 5

Optimization of reaction period for biosynthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles

Metal

Precursor compound

Time (h)

36

48

60

72

84

96

120

Zn

ZnO

82 ± 0.1a

64 ± 0.4

44 ± 0.3

30 ± 0.2

29 ± 0.1

29 ± 0.1

29 ± 0.1

ZnNO3

90 ± 0.3

72 ± 0.3

41 ± 0.3

46 ± 0.1

46 ± 0.2

46 ± 0.2

46 ± 0.3

Mg

MgNO3

84 ± 0.4

58 ± 0.8

38 ± 0.4

15 ± 0.7

15 ± 0.4

15 ± 0.4

14 ± 0.3

MgO

91 ± 0.4

61 ± 0.4

36 ± 0.3

10 ± 0.4

10 ± 0.4

10 ± 0.7

10 ± 0.4

Ti

TiO2 Rutile

84 ± 0.3

54 ± 0.4

29 ± 0.3

15 ± 0.3

15 ± 0.3

15 ± 0.4

15 ± 0.4

TiO2 Anatase

89 ± 0.5

59 ± 0.5

31 ± 0.4

13 ± 0.4

13 ± 0.4

12 ± 0.4

12 ± 0.3

0–24 h no particle produced at nanometre scale

±   Standard errors of mean

a Average particle size in nm

Standardization of reaction medium pH for nanoparticle biosynthesis

In order to standardize the pH of the reaction mixture of precursor compounds with extracellular enzyme secrets only the best precursor compound of each metal (ZnO for Zn; MgO for Mg; TiO 2 anatase for Ti) was tested at various pH levels ranging between 4 and 8 with an increment of 0.5. The average nanoparticle size was reduced with increase in pH from 4.0 to 5.5, which was further enhanced up to pH 8.0 (Table  6 ). In general, the pH 5.5 was found the most suitable not only for accelerating the rate of reaction but also to substantially reduce nanoparticle size as compared to other pH levels. The least nanoparticle size of 8 nm was recorded using MgO for magnesium nanoparticles followed by 11 nm by TiO 2 (anatase) for Titanium and 26 nm by ZnO for zinc metal nanoparticles at 5.5 pH.

Table 6

Average distribution of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticle at different pH of the reaction medium

Precursor compound

pH

4.0

4.5

5.0

5.5

6.0

6.5

7.0

7.5

8.0

ZnO

45 ± 0.3a

30 ± 0.4

28 ± 0.2

26 ± 0.1

30 ± 0.2

38 ± 0.2

59 ± 0.3

63 ± 0.1

98 ± 0.8

MgO

35 ± 0.3

30 ± 0.2

12 ± 0.1

8 ± 0.1

14 ± 0.2

25 ± 0.3

35 ± 0.4

54 ± 0.7

72 ± 0.7

TiO2 (Anatase)

39 ± 0.4

21 ± 0.2

12 ± 0.3

11 ± 0.1

24 ± 0.1

37 ± 0.2

62 ± 0.2

83 ± 0.6

98 ± 0.9

±   Standard errors of mean

a Particle size in nm

Optimization of temperature for nanoparticle biosynthesis

To standardize the temperature for optimum production of different nanoparticles, various temperatures between 20 and 40 °C were tested. The maximum production of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles was recorded at 28 °C temperature (Table  7 ). The average distribution with regards to size of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles increased when temperature deviated from 28 °C.

Table 7

Optimization of temperature for biosynthesis of metal nanoparticles

Precursor compound

Temperature (°C)

20

23

25

28

30

32

34

38

40

ZnO

63 ± 0.4a

48 ± 0.3

34 ± 0.8

26 ± 0.2

28 ± 0.7

28 ± 0.4

29 ± 0.3

38 ± 0.5

52 ± 0.4

MgO

58 ± 0.5

37 ± 0.9

19 ± 0.3

8 ± 0.4

11 ± 0.4

12 ± 0.7

12 ± 0.3

19 ± 0.6

36 ± 0.7

TiO2

57 ± 0.3

34 ± 0.4

21 ± 0.8

12 ± 0.6

14 ± 0.4

14 ± 0.3

17 ± 0.2

29 ± 0.4

43 ± 0.3

±   Standard errors of mean

a Particle size in nm

Effect of storage time on nanoparticle stability

Once the nanoparticle is synthesized in solution, agglomeration is a recurrent problem with storage and adversely affects field applications. Therefore, effect of storage time on stability of biosynthesized nanoparticles was tested from zero to 125 days. The results presented in Table  8 , exhibited that the size of the nanoparticles remains unchanged from 0 to 7 days and increased thereafter up to 125 days. The results of the effect of storage on stability of biosynthesized nanoparticles suggest that the best result of their application in field can be effectively used up to 90 days for Zn and Ti nanoparticles and up to 105 days for biosynthesized Mg nanoparticles.

Table 8

Effect of storage time on stability of biosynthesized Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles

Type of nanoparticle

Time (days)

0

1

3

7

15

30

45

60

75

90

105

125

Zn

26.4 ± 0.1a

26.4 ± 0.1

26.8 ± 0.8

26.8 ± 0.4

27.1 ± 0.3

28.9 ± 0.8

36.8 ± 0.1

66.4 ± 0.8

83.4 ± 0.4

96.3 ± 0.4

148.6 ± 0.4

219.6 ± 0.8

Mg

8.2 ± 0.5

8.2 ± 0.4

8.5 ± 0.7

8.8 ± 0.4

9.2 ± 0.6

14.6 ± 0.7

22.6 ± 0.4

56.3 ± 0.4

68.4 ± 0.3

84.5 ± 0.8

98.3 ± 0.3

138.6 ± 0.8

Ti

12.2 ± 0.4

12.2 ± 1.0

12.5 ± 0.8

12.9 ± 0.9

13.4 ± 0.7

15.2 ± 0.6

23.4 ± 0.8

52.1 ± 0.4

62.3 ± 0.8

85.8 ± 0.6

102.8 ± 0.4

142.9 ± 0.8

± Standard errors of mean

a Particle size in nm

Characterization of biosynthesized Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles

The size of bio-transformed Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles was initially measured by DLS technique which analyzes particle size distribution in the solution phase. The histograms for biosynthesized nanoparticles of Zn, Mg and Ti metal (Fig.  1 a, c) clearly exhibit that mean hydrodynamic diameter of size distribution for Zn nanoparticles was below 10 nm and Mg nanoparticles size was less than 7.8 nm, whereas, Ti nanoparticles showing size lower than 6 nm on the basis of number distribution in the solution. To measure the exact shape and size of synthesized nanoparticles, TEM examination was performed.

Fig. 1

Histogram obtained from DLS technique showing number distribution of biologically synthesized a Zn, b Mg, c Ti nanoparticles

The surface charge of the nanoparticles plays a crucial role during interaction with molecule of other biological system such as plant, which should normally be in the range of −30 to +30 mV. The surface charge of biosynthesized Zn nanoparticle was measured as zeta potential of −5.70 mV, whereas, −6.66 and −6.25 mV of Mg and Ti, respectively (Fig.  2 a, c).

Fig. 2

Zeta potential of biologically synthesized a Zn, b Mg, c Ti nanoparticles

The transmission electron microscopic (TEM) images of biosynthesized Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles were shown in Fig.  3 a, c. It can be clearly seen in the low magnification image that all the nanoparticles were present in monodisperse stage. To further validate the surface morphology drop-coated AFM, three dimensional images were taken in non-contact mode (Fig.  4 a, c). Result shows variability in morphological features of biosynthesized nanoparticles of Zn, Mg and Ti.

Fig. 3

TEM micrographs of biologically synthesized nanoparticles at 50 nm scale bar a Zn, b Mg, c Ti

Fig. 4

AFM micrographs of biologically synthesized a Zn, b Mg, c Ti nanoparticles

The elemental compositions of bio-transformed product containing Zn nanoparticles in the solution were confirmed by TEM equipped with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The results of TEM–EDX (Fig.  5 a, c) clearly show that the Zn nanoparticles were highly intense and the maximum intensity was found at 1 keV, whereas, Mg and Ti show maximum intensity at 1.3 and 4.6 keV, respectively. Results clearly exhibit the purity of biosynthesized metal nanoparticles.

Fig. 5

EDX spectrums of biosynthesized a Zn, b Mg, c Ti nanoparticles

The present study approaches towards the eco-friendly biological synthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticle using different precursor salt compounds by employing the cell-free enzymatic protein solution obtained by the secretion of fungal ball of mycelia. Fungal balls were developed for the recovery of higher protein contents used for nanoparticle biosynthesis. It is well reported that rhizosphere region exhibits more diverse niche for microbial population due to presence of organic contents. Production of metal nanoparticle from fungi has several advantages over bacteria, plant and other approaches i.e. physical, chemical and aerosol. However, development of simple and eco-friendly route would help in promoting further interest in the synthesis and application of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles. Nature has provided us exciting possibilities for utilizing fungi as biological system for this purpose. In our previous report, Raliya and Tarafdar [ 19 ], we also obtained ZnO nanoparticle using the cell-free filtrate obtained from fungus of Aspergillus species which further supports the present research work.

To synthesize metal nanoparticles from fungal extracellular enzymes, precursor compound of each metal of interest was added. Selection of compounds was based on their ionic potential in water with fungal extracellular enzymes. Sulfates, chlorides, nitrates and oxides of the metal were selected for the synthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticle on the basis of their ionic strength. It was found that the oxides of the metals have the best potential for reduction of metal into nanoparticles of that metal. A study was earlier reported by Kaul et al. [ 20 ] in which they show the synthesis of Mg and Fe nanoparticles in different chemical environments, supports the present investigation.

The majority of enzymes normally exhibit a strong dependence of activity on the pH of the medium [ 21 ], thus it is important to optimize the pH of the reaction medium in which nanoparticle synthesizes. In the biosynthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticle concentration of hydrogen ion of the reaction medium plays an important role for nanoparticle size. Results showed in Table  7 clearly indicate that pH close to 5.5 is suitable for biosynthesis of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles. It might be possible that pH specific catalytic activity of enzyme secreted from fungus and as the pH changes, catalytic efficiency of enzyme also altered. A similar study was reported by Kathiresan et al. [ 22 ] for the synthesis of silver nanoparticle using marine fungus Penicillium fellutanum , isolated from coastal mangrove sediment.

The biologically synthesized Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles present in the aqueous medium were quite stable, even up to 90 days for Zn and Ti nanoparticles whereas 105 days for Mg nanoparticles. This is an important aspect of biological nanoparticle synthesis, since the lack of sufficient stability of the nanoparticle preparation has to some extent impeded the development of the real-world application of biologically developed nanomaterial. A similar study was conducted for silver nanoparticle by Bhainsa and D’Souza [ 23 ]. The aggregation of Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticle occurs after 90 and 105 days due to intermolecular interaction formed between synthesized nanoparticles and may be among the proteins, which encapsulate the nanoparticle.

Conclusion

Nanoparticles of zinc, magnesium and titanium were synthesized using fungus by employing various precursor salts of sulfates, nitrates, chloride and oxides. Factors responsible for more production of monodispersed Zn, Mg and Ti nanoparticles were optimized. It was concluded that 0.1 mM precursor salt concentration, 72 h of incubation at pH 5.5 and temperature 28 °C resulted more nanoparticle yield. The biosynthesized functional Zn and Ti nanoparticles can be stored up to 90 days and Mg nanoparticles up to 105 days in its nanoform.


Acknowledgements

Authors are appreciating World Bank - Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), National Agricultural Innovation Project (NAIP/C4/417001-05) for financial assistance. RR thankful to CAZRI Jodhpur for ICAR Research Associate Fellowship.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References

  1. Wu et al. (2011) Biocompatible inorganic fullerene-like molybdenum disulfide nanoparticles produced by pulsed laser ablation in water (pp. 1276-1281) 10.1021/nn102941b
  2. Mphilisi et al. (2012) Layer-by-layer self-assembled metal-ion- (ag-, co-, ni-, and pd) doped TiO2 nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization, and visible light degradation of rhodamine B 10.1155/2012/302046
  3. Guzman et al. (2009) Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by chemical reduction method and their antibacterial activity (pp. 104-111)
  4. Chen et al. (2003) Evidence of the production of silver nanoparticles via pretreatment of Phoma sp.3.2883 with silver nitrate (pp. 105-108) 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01348.x
  5. Zhou et al. (1999) Formation of silver nanowires by a novel solid- liquid phase arc discharge method (pp. 545-546) 10.1021/cm981122h
  6. Thakkar et al. (2010) Biological synthesis of metallic nanoparticles (pp. 257-262) 10.1016/j.nano.2009.07.002
  7. Raliya and Tarafdar (2012) Novel approach for silver nanoparticles synthesis using Aspergillus terreus CZR-1: mechanism perspective (pp. 12-16) 10.1166/jbns.2012.1073
  8. Raut et al. (2009) Phytosynthesis of silver nanoparticle using Gliricidia sepium (Jacq.) (pp. 117-122) 10.2174/157341309787314674
  9. Boisseau and Loubaton (2011) Nanomedicine, nanotechnology in medicine (pp. 620-636) 10.1016/j.crhy.2011.06.001
  10. Roucoux et al. (2002) Reduced transition metal colloids: a novel family of reusable catalysts (pp. 3757-3778) 10.1021/cr010350j
  11. Niemeyer (2001) Nanoparticles, proteins, and nucleic acids: biotechnology meets materials science (pp. 4128-4158) 10.1002/1521-3773(20011119)40:22<4128::AID-ANIE4128>3.0.CO;2-S
  12. Seferos and Giljohann (2007) Nano-flares: probes for transfection and mRNA detection in living cells (pp. 15477-15479) 10.1021/ja0776529
  13. Hagfeldt and Graetzel (2000) Molecular photovoltaics (pp. 269-277) 10.1021/ar980112j
  14. Jackson et al. (2003) Controlling the surface enhanced Raman Effect via the nanoshell geometry (pp. 257-259) 10.1063/1.1534916
  15. Parak et al. (2005) Labelling of cells with quantum dots (pp. 9-25) 10.1088/0957-4484/16/2/R01
  16. Subramanian and Tarafdar (2011) Prospects of nanotechnology in Indian farming (pp. 887-893)
  17. Fedlheim and Foss (2001) CRC Press
  18. Park et al. (2009) Effects of ZnO nanopowder dispersion on photocatalytic reactions for the removal of Ag+ ions from aqueous solution (pp. 105-109) 10.1007/s10832-008-9427-0
  19. Raliya and Tarafdar (2013) ZnO nanoparticle biosynthesis and its effect on phosphorous mobilizing enzyme secretion and gum contents in Clusterbean (Cyamopsis tetragonoloba L) (pp. 48-57)
  20. Kaul et al. (2012) Magnesium and iron nanoparticles production using microorganism and various salts 10.2478/s13536-012-0028-x
  21. Clark and Switzer (1977) W. H. Freeman and Company
  22. Kathiresan et al. (2009) Studies on silver nanoparticles synthesized by a marine fungus, Penicillium fellutanum isolated from coastal mangrove sediment (pp. 133-137) 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2009.01.016
  23. Bhainsa and D’Souza (2006) Extracellular biosynthesis of silver nanoparticles using the fungus Aspergillus fumigates (pp. 160-164) 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2005.11.026