10.57647/ijrowa-k96c-rj49

Digestate biofertilization: a sustainable pathway to increase global soil C content

PDF
  • Iryna Ablieieva*1,
  • Iryna Sipko2,
  • Thuane Mendes Anacleto3,
  • Alex Enrich-Prast4,
  • Oksana Burla2,
  1. "Department of Thematic Studies – Environmental Changes and Biogas Solutions Research Center (BSRC), Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden AND Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection Technologies, Sumy State University, 40007, Sumy, Ukraine"
  2. Department of Ecology and Environmental Protection Technologies, Sumy State University, 40007, Sumy, Ukraine
  3. Unidade Multiusuário de Análises Ambientais, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biotecnologia Vegetal e Bioprocessos, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  4. Department of Thematic Studies – Environmental Changes and Biogas Solutions Research Center (BSRC), Linköping University, SE-581 83, Linköping, Sweden and Unidade Multiusuário de Análises Ambientais, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil and Institute of Marine Science, Federal University of São Paulo (IMar/UNIFESP), Santos, Brazil
Digestate biofertilization: a sustainable pathway to increase global soil C content

Received: 2024-02-13

Revised: 2024-06-12

Accepted: 2024-08-31

Published 2024-10-28

Copyright (c) 2024 Iryna Ablieieva, Iryna Sipko, Thuane Mendes Anacleto, Alex Enrich-Prast, Oksana Burla (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Ablieieva, I., Sipko, I., Mendes Anacleto, T., Enrich-Prast, A., & Burla, O. (2024). Digestate biofertilization: a sustainable pathway to increase global soil C content. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijrowa-k96c-rj49
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 135

Abstract

Purpose: This paper is aimed at the determination of digestate potential in a long-term carbon accumulation after its application as a biofertilizer.

Method: Literature survey of > 1000 papers was conducted and resulted in a selection of 21 papers that involved data of soil C accumulation after digestate addition for at least a period of 12 months. Meta-analysis was used for data analysis and interpretation of a large database. The results of incorporation of total organic carbon in the soil after digestate biofertilization were measured by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: A comprehensive literature review showed trends for carbon increase in the soil for different experiment periods up to 84 months and initial content of carbon in the soil. It was demonstrated that application of digestate, a byproduct of anaerobic digestion, to agricultural soils resulted in an increase of soil carbon content for a period of up to 8 years. Specifically, digestate derived from cow and pig manure had the highest potential to enhance soil carbon accumulation compared to digestate from other organic residues including food waste and sewage sludge, highlighting the need for a proper choice of the waste substrate used in anaerobic digestion. Soil carbon accumulation is notably more pronounced when digestate is applied to soils with low organic matter content, particularly sandy and loam soils. Conclusion: While digestate application to soils is typically used to substitute mineral fertilizers, it also leads to an overall increase in soil carbon content.

Research Highlights

  • Among different types of manure cow and pig manure showed the highest results in the terms of long term (> 12 months) carbon accumulation in the soil after biofertilization.
  • A general tendency of lower carbon increase in the soil for the period of 12 months and maximum increase at 36 months of experiment was found.
  • Digestate can be very successfully used to help reforestation efforts, as they usually have lower soil C content than natural areas.
  • Obtained results for the period of more than 12 months showed the highest soil carbon increase (more than 2% per month) for sandy soil.
  • Wheat and maize were found to be the best crops in terms of the potential for carbon accumulation in the soil after digestate biofertilization.

Keywords

  • Biofertilizer,
  • Climate impact,
  • Food security,
  • Organic matter,
  • Soil carbon,
  • Soil restoration
PDF

References

  1. Ablieieva I, Artyukhova N, Krmela J, Malovanyy M, Berezhnyi D (2022a) Fluidized bed dryers in terms of minimizing environmental impact and achieving the sustainable development goals. Drying Technol 40(8):1598-1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2022.2081174
  2. Ablieieva I, Berezhna I, Berezhnyi D, Prast AE, Geletukha G, Lutsenko S, Yanchenko I, Carraro G (2022b) Technologies for environmental safety application of digestate as biofertilizer. Ecolog Eng Environ Technol 23(3):106-119. https://doi.org/10.12912/27197050/147154
  3. Ablieieva I, Geletukha G, Kucheruk P, Enrich-Prast A, Carraro G, Berezhna I, Berezhnyi D (2022c) Digestate potential to substitute mineral fertilizers: engineering approaches. J Eng Sci 9(1):H1-H10. https://doi.org/10.21272/jes.2022.9(1).h1
  4. Aduba CC, Ndukwe JK, Chukwu OK, Onyeiwu SC, Moneke AN (2023) Integrated valorization of cassava wastes for production of bioelectricity, biogas and biofertilizer. Waste Biomass Valor 14(12):1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-023-02126-3
  5. Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Ferre-Costa A, Carrasco L, Cegarra J, Abad M, Bernal MP (2012) Assessment of the fertiliser potential of digestates from farm and agro-industrial residues. Biomass Bioenergy 40:181-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.018
  6. Amelung W, Bossio D, de Vries W, Kögel-Knabner I, Lehmann J, Amundson R, Bol R, Collins C, Lal R, Leifeld J, et al (2020) Towards a global-scale soil climate mitigation strategy. Nature Commun 11(1):5427. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-18887-7
  7. Angouria-Tsorochidou E, Seghetta M, Trémier A, Thomsen M (2022) Life cycle assessment of digestate post-treatment and utilization. Sci.Total Environ 815:152764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152764
  8. Aso SN (2020). Digestate: the coproduct of biofuel production in a circular economy, and new results for cassava peeling residue digestate. In: Taner T, Tiwari A, Ustun TS (eds) Renewable Energy, 1st edn. London, United Kingdom, pp 199-227. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.91340
  9. Basher L, Betts H, De Rose RC, Lynn I, Marden M, McNeill S, Sutherland A, Willoughby J, Page M, Rosser B (2011) Accounting for the effects of mass-movement erosion on soil carbon stocks in the soil carbon monitoring system: a pilot project. Wellington New Zealand, Ministry for the Environment. https://www.mpi.govt.nz/dmsdocument/30128/direct. Accessed 3 January 2024.
  10. Basile-Doelsch I, Balesdent J, Pellerin S (2020) Reviews and syntheses: The mechanisms underlying carbon storage in soil. Biogeosciences 17:5223-5242. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-5223-2020
  11. Bradford MA, Wieder WR, Bonan GB, Fierer N, Raymond PA, Crowther TW (2016) Managing uncertainty in soil carbon feedbacks to climate change. Nat Clim Chang 6: 751-758. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3071
  12. Chernysh Y, Plyatsuk L, Roubik H, Yakhnenko O, Skvortsova P, Bataltsev Y (2021) Application of technological solutions for bioremediation of soils contaminated with heavy metals. J Eng Sci 8(2):H8-H16. https://doi.org/10.21272/jes.2021.8(2).h2
  13. Chubur V, Chernysh Y, Ferchau E, Zaffar N (2022) Effect of phosphogypsum addition on methane yield in biogas and digestate properties during anaerobic digestion. J Eng Sci 9(1):H11-H18. https://doi.org/10.21272/jes.2022.9(1).h2
  14. Creamer CA, de Menezes AB, Krull ES, Sanderman J, Newton-Walters R, Farrell M (2015) Microbial community structure mediates response of soil C decomposition to litter addition and warming. Soil Biol Biochemistry 80:175-188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.10.008
  15. Daunoras J, Kačergius A, Gudiukaitė R (2024) Role of soil microbiota enzymes in soil health and activity changes depending on climate change and the type of soil ecosystem. Biology 13(2):85. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13020085
  16. De Rose RC (2013) Slope control on the frequency distribution of shallow landslides and associated soil properties. Earth Surf Processes Landforms 38(4):356-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3283
  17. Don A, Seidel F, Leifeld J, Kätterer T, Martin M, Pellerin S, Emde D, Seitz D, Chenu C (2023) Carbon sequestration in soils and climate change mitigation—Definitions and pitfalls. Global Change Biol 30: e16983. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.16983
  18. Drosg B, Fuchs W, Al Seadi T, Madsen M, Linke B (2015) Nutrient recovery by biogas digestate processing. IEA Bioenergy 2015:711. JRC97163.
  19. Foereid B, Szocs J, Patinvoh RJ, Horváth IS (2021) Effect of anaerobic digestion of manure before application to soil – benefits for nitrogen utilization? Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricul 10(1):89-99. https://doi.org/10.30486/ijrowa.2020.1897538.1055
  20. García-López AM, Delgado A, Anjos O, Horta C (2023) Digestate not only affects nutrient availability but also soil quality indicators. Agronomy 13(5):1308. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13051308
  21. Głowacka A, Szostak B, Klebaniuk R (2020) Effect of biogas digestate and mineral fertilisation on the soil properties and yield and nutritional value of switch grass for age. Agronomy 10(4):490. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10040490
  22. Guo Z, Han J, Li J, Xu Y, Wang X (2019) Effects of long-term fertilization on soil organic carbon mineralization and microbial community structure. PLOS ONE 14(1): e0211163. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211163
  23. He L, Zhu Q, Wang Y, Chen C, He M, Tan F (2021) Irrigating digestate to improve cadmium phytoremediation potential of Pennisetum hybridum. Chemosphere 279:130592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130592
  24. Holm-Nielsen JB, Al Seadi T, Oleskowicz-Popiel P (2009) The future of anaerobic digestion and biogas utilization. Bioresour Technol 100(22):5478-5484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2008.12.046
  25. Insam H, Gómez-Brandón M, Ascher J (2015) Manure-based biogas fermentation residues – Friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biol Biochemistry 84:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.006
  26. Kopittke PM, Menzies NW, Wang P, McKenna BA, Lombi E (2019) Soil and the intensification of agriculture for global food security. Environ Int 132:105078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.105078
  27. Koszel M, Lorencowicz E (2015) Agricultural use of biogas digestate as a replacement fertilizers. Agricul Sci Procedia 7:119-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aaspro.2015.12.004
  28. Kowalska A, Bieniek M (2022) Meeting the European green deal objective of expanding organic farming. Equilib Q J Econ Econ Policy 17(3): 607–633. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.2022.021
  29. Kumar S, Kundu M, Das A, Rakshit R, Siddiqui MW, Rani R (2019) Substitution of mineral fertilizers with biofertilizer: analternate to improve the growth, yield and functional biochemical properties of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) cv. Camarosa. J Plant Nutri 42(15):1818-1837. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2019.1643363
  30. Logan M, Visvanathan C (2019) Management strategies for anaerobic digestate of organic fraction of municipal solid waste: Current status and future prospects. Waste Manag Res 37(1):27-39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18816793
  31. Lynch J, Cain M, Frame D, Pierrehumbert R (2021) Agriculture's contribution to climate change and role in mitigation is distinct from predominantly fossil CO2-emitting sectors. Frontiers Sustain Food Syst 4:518039. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.518039
  32. Mahmoud N, Abdou MAH, Salaheldin S, Soliman WS, Abbas AM (2023) The impact of irrigation intervals and NPK/ yeast on the vegetative growth characteristics and essential oil content of lemongrass. Horticulture 9(3):365. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9030365
  33. Malovanyy А, Plaza E, Trela J, Malovanyy M (2014) Combination of ion exchange and partial nitritation/Anammox process for ammonium removal from mainstream municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 70(1):144-151. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.208
  34. Malovanyy M, Moroz O, Popovich V, Kopiy M, Tymchuk I, Sereda A, Krusir G, Soloviy C (2021) The perspective of using the «open biological conveyor» method for purifying landfill filtrates. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 16:100611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2021.100611
  35. Minasny B, Malone BP, McBratney AB, Angers DA, Arrouays D, Chambers A, Chaplot V, Chen ZS, Cheng K, Das BS et al (2017) Soil carbon 4 per mile. Geoderma 292:59-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.002
  36. Ni P, Lyu T, Sun H, Dong R, Wu S (2017) Liquid digestate recycled utilization in anaerobic digestion of pig manure: Effect on methane production, system stability and heavy metal mobilization. Energy 141:1695-1704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.11.107
  37. Nolan S, Waters NR, Brennan F, Auer A, Fenton O, Richards K, Bolton DJ, Pritchard L, O’Flaherty V, Abram F (2018) Toward assessing farm-based anaerobic digestate public health risks: comparative investigation with slurry, effect of pasteurization treatments, and use of miniature bioreactors as proxies for pathogen spiking trials. Frontiers Sustain Food Syst 2(41):11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2018.00041
  38. Obaideen K, Abdelkareem MA, Wilberforce T, Elsaid K, Sayed ET, Maghrabie HM, Olabi AG (2022) Biogas role in achievement of the sustainable development goals: evaluation, challenges, and guidelines. J Taiwan Inst Chem Engineers 131:104207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtice.2022.104207
  39. Ostrowska A, Porębska G, Kanafa M (2010) Carbon accumulation and distribution in profiles of forest soils. Pol J Environ Stud 19(6):1307-1315.
  40. Pecorini I, Peruzzi E, Albini E, Doni S, Macci C, Masciandaro G, Iannelli R (2020) Evaluation of MSW compost and digestate mixtures for a circular economy application. Sustainability 12(7):3042. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073042
  41. Pezzolla D, Bol R, Gigliotti G, Sawamoto T, Lopez AL, Cardenas L, Chadwick D (2012) Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from soils amended with digestate derived from anaerobic treatment of food waste. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrometry 26(20): 2422-2430. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcm.6362
  42. Piadeh F, Offie I, Behzadian K, Rizzuto JP, Bywater A, Córdoba-Pachón J, Walker M (2024) A critical review for the impact of anaerobic digestion on the sustainable development goals. J Environ Manag 349:119458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119458
  43. Pinto JA, Barros RM, dos Santos IFS, Tiago FGL, Botan MCO, Vilas BTF (2023) Study of the Anaerobic co-digestion of bovine and swine manure: technical and economic feasibility analysis. SSRN Electron J 5:100097. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3954351
  44. Regulation (EU) 2019/1009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 laying down rules on the making available on the market of EU fertilising products and amending Regulations (EC) No 1069/2009 and (EC) No 1107/2009 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2003/2003 (Text with EEA relevance). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32019R1009
  45. Reuland G, Sigurnjak I, Dekker H, Sleutel S, Meers E (2022) Assessment of the carbon and nitrogen mineralisation of digestates elaborated from distinct feedstock profiles. Agronomy 12(2):456. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12020456
  46. Sogn TA, Dragicevic I, Linjordet R, Krogstad T, Eijsink VGH, Eich-Greatorex S (2018) Recycling of biogas digestates in plant production: NPK fertilizer value and risk of leaching. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricul 7(1):49-58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-017-0188-0
  47. Tóth G, Hermann T, da Silva MR, Montanarella L (2018) Monitoring soil for sustainable development and land degradation neutrality. Environ Monit Assess 190(2):57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-6415-3
  48. Walsh JJ, Jones DL, Chadwick DR, Williams AP (2018) Repeated application of anaerobic digestate, undigested cow slurry and inorganic fertilizer N: Impacts on pasture yield and quality. Grass Forage Sci 73(3):758-763. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12354
  49. Xiong S, Kätterer T (2010) Carbon-allocation dynamics in reed canary grass as affected by soil type and fertilization rates in northern Sweden. Acta Agricul Scandinavica Sect B – Plant Soil Sci 60(1):24-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710802558518
  50. Yan Q, Liu X, Wang Y, Li H, Li Z, Zhou L, Qu Y, Li Z, Bao X (2018) Cow manure as a lignocellulosic substrate for fungal cellulase expression and bioethanol production. AMB Exp 8:190.
  51. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-018-0720-2
  52. Zucca C, Le QB, Karampiperis P, Lemann T, Thomas R, Thiombiano BA, Hermassi T, Bonaiuti E, Zervas P (2024) Toward an operational tool to integrate land degradation neutrality into land use planning: LUP4LDN. Land Degrad Dev 35(7):2489–2507. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.5075