10.57647/ijrowa-tyz5-1967

Cocoa pod husk wastes derived biochar for overcoming potassium deficiency in organic agriculture

PDF
  • Murali Gopal*1,
  • Elain Apshara S. 2,
  • Sathyaseelan Neenu1,
  • Alka Gupta1,
  1. ICAR-Central Plantation Crops Research Institute, Kasaragod, Kerala, India
  2. ICAR-Central Plantation Crops ResearchInstitute, Regional Station, Vittal, Dakshina Kannada, Karnataka
Cocoa pod husk wastes derived biochar for overcoming potassium deficiency in organic agriculture

Received: 2024-01-17

Revised: 2024-03-29

Accepted: 2024-09-28

Published 2024-10-28

Copyright (c) 2024 Murali Gopal, Elain Apshara S. , Sathyaseelan Neenu, Alka Gupta (Author)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Gopal, M., S. , E. A., Neenu, S., & Gupta, A. (2024). Cocoa pod husk wastes derived biochar for overcoming potassium deficiency in organic agriculture. International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/ijrowa-tyz5-1967
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 134

Abstract

Purpose: Potassium (K) deficiency is emerging as a significant global agricultural challenge impacting 20% of farming areas and posing a threat to food security. In India, the potassium deficit has aggravated due to a focus on nitrogen and phosphorus application, with the net potassium balance declining from -3.29 million tonnes in 2000–01 to -7.2 million tonnes in 2015–16. Cocoa cultivation in Southern states of India like Kerala, Karnataka, Andhra Pradesh, and Tamil Nadu, produce substantial biomass waste, including cocoa pod husks, which are rich in potassium.

Method: This study explores the conversion of cocoa pod husks into biochar as a sustainable potassium source. Cocoa residues, including leaves, pod husks, and bean shells, were sun- and polyhouse-dried before being pyrolyzed in a single-drum charring kiln. The biochar produced from cocoa pod husks was selected for further analysis due to its superior quality, with a conversion efficiency of approximately 40%.

Results: The resulting biochar had a potassium content of 10.9%, with 60% of it being water-soluble, and also contained 13% organic carbon along with nitrogen, phosphorus, and micronutrients. Physico-chemical and microbiological analyses revealed the biochar's alkaline pH (10.7) property, low bulk density (0.41 g/cc), and low native microbial activity, with Bacillus spp. being the dominant microbe. An ecotoxicity assay using earthworms indicated no acute toxicity, although earthworms took longer to acclimatize to the cocoa pod husk biochar compared to coconut residue biochar.

Conclusion: Thus, cocoa pod husk biochar, with its high potassium content, organic carbon, and non-toxicity to earthworms, offers a sustainable solution for potassium deficiency in soils, particularly in organic agriculture.

Research Highlights

  • Cocoa farmers in India find it difficult to dispose of pod husk wastes generated @ 15-17 tonnes/ha
  • Recycling this waste via pyrolysis to produce biochar was attempted
  • Biochar produced from cocoa-pod husk wastes had 10-11% readily available potassium
  • Cocoa-pod husk biochar can help overcome potassium deficiency in organic agriculture

Keywords

  • Cocoa pod husk biochar,
  • Organic wastes,
  • Potassium nutrition,
  • Organic farming
PDF

References

  1. Abbey CYB, Duwiejuah AB, Quianoo AK (2023) Removal of toxic metals from aqueous phase using cacao pod husk biochar in the era of green chemistry. Appl Water Sci 13:57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01863-5
  2. Ahmedna M, Johns MM, Clarke SJ, Marshall WE, Rao RM (1997) Potential of agricultural by-product-based carbons for use in raw colour decolourisation. J Sci Food Agric 75:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0010(199709)75:1%3C117::AID-JSFA850%3E3.0.CO;2-M
  3. Andrews EM, Kassama S, Smith EE, Brown PH. Khalsa SDS (2021) A Review of potassium-rich crop residues used as organic matter amendments in tree crop agroecosystems. Agriculture 11: 580. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agriculture11070580
  4. Ankrah EK (1974) Chemical studies of some plant wastes from Ghana. J Sci Ed Agric 25:1229-32. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740251006
  5. Askegaard M, Eriksen J (2002) Exchangeable potassium in soil as indicator of potassium status in an organic crop rotation on loamy sand. Soil Use Manag 18(2): 84–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-2743.2002.tb00224.x
  6. Brownlie WJ, Alexander P, Maslin M, Canedo-Arguelles M, Sutton MA, Spears BM (2024) Global food security threatened by potassium neglect. Nat Food 5: 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-024-00929-8
  7. Chandra Mohanan R (1994) Diseases of Cocoa. In: Chadha KL, Rethinam P (ed) Advances in horticulture Vol. 10 – Plantation and Spice Crops Part 2. Eds. Malhothra Publishing House, New Delhi. pp 1001 – 1014.
  8. Chapman HD, Pratt PF (1961) Methods of analysis for soils, plants and waters. University of California, Los Angeles, 60-61, 150-179.
  9. Chen G, Wang Y, Wang J, Wang J, Yu F, Ma Q, Cheng Z, Yan B, Song Y, Cui X (2023) Production of potassium-enriched biochar from Canna indica: Transformation and release of potassium. Waste Manag 1, 164:119-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.03.044
  10. Cheng KL, Bray RH (1951) Determination of calcium and magnesium in soil and plant materials. Soil Sci 72(6): 449-457. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-195112000-00005
  11. Chowdappa P, Sridhar V, Reddy PVR, Sriram S, Mohan Kumar SP (2016) Meeting report: management of Phytophthora –a deadly plant pathogen. Curr Sci 110(12): 2213-2215.
  12. Das D, Sahoo J, Raza MB, Burman M, Das R (2022) Ongoing soil potassium depletion under intensive cropping in India and probable mitigation strategies. A review. Agron Sustain Dev. 42:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-021-00728-6
  13. Elain Apshara S (2015) Growth and yield performance of Trinidad cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) collections in Karnataka. J Plantation Crops 43(3): 240-244. https://doi.org/10.19071/jpc.2015.v43.i3.2860
  14. Elain Apshara S (2019) Cocoa genetic resources and their utilization in palm-based cropping systems in India. pp-117-134. In: Aikpokpodion PO (ed) Theobroma cacao: Deploying science for sustainability of global cocoa economy. Intech Open Publisher. https://doi.org/10.5772/Intechopen.73761. p-164
  15. Elain Apshara S, Krithika KJ (2018) Evaluation of selective cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) clones from Central and South America in their initial years of growth. J Plantation Crops 46(3): 218-220. https://doi.org/10.25081/jpc.2018.v46.i3.2056
  16. Fidelis C, Rajashekhar Rao BK (2017) Enriched cocoa pod composts and their fertilizing effects on hybrid cocoa seedlings. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 6:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s4009 3-017-0156-8
  17. Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51:2061–2069. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.25409) @2008
  18. Gopal M, Bhute SS, Gupta A, Prabhu SR, Thomas GV, Whitman WB, Jangid K (2017) Changes in structure and function of bacterial communities during coconut leaf vermicomposting. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 110: 1339–1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-017-0894-7
  19. Gopal M, Gupta A, Shahul Hameed K, Neenu S, Khadeejath Rajeela TH, Thomas GV (2020) Biochars produced from coconut palm biomass residues can aid regenerative agriculture by improving soil properties and plant yield in humid tropics. Biochar 2: 211–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42773-020-00043-5
  20. Guest D (2007) Black pod: diverse pathogens with a global impact on cocoa yield. Phytopathology 97(12):1650-1653. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-97-12-1650
  21. Gyedu-Akoto E, Yabani D, Sefa J, Owusu D (2015) Natural skin-care products: The case of soap made from cocoa pod husk potash. Advances in Research 4(6): 365-370. https://doi.org/10.9734/AIR/2015/17029
  22. Jackson ML (1973) Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall of Englewood cliffs, New Jersey, USA
  23. Lee Y, Park J, Ryu C, Gang KS, Yang W, Park YK, Jung J, Hyun S (2013) Comparison of biochar properties from biomass residues produced by slow pyrolysis at 500°C. Bioresour Technol 148: 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.135
  24. Lu F, Rodriguez-Garcia J, Van Damme I, Westwood NJ, Shaw L, Robinson JS, Warren G, Chatzifragkou A, Mason SM, Gomez L, Faas L, Balcombe K, Srinivasan C, Picchioni F, Hadley P, Charalampopoulos D (2018) Valorisation strategies for cocoa pod husk and its fractions. Curr Open Green Sust Chem 14: 80-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2018.07.007
  25. Mansur D, Tago T, Masuda T, Abimanyu H (2014) Conversion of cacao pod husks by pyrolysis and catalytic reaction to produce useful chemicals. Biomass and Bioenergy 66: 275-285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.065
  26. Mikkelson R (2007) Managing potassium for organic crop production. Hort Technology 17: 455-460.
  27. Odesola IF, Owoseni AT (2010) Development of local technology for a small-scale biochar production process from agricultural wastes. J Emerg Trends Eng Appl Sci 1(2):205–208
  28. Peter PK Chandra Mohanan R (2011) Occurrence and distribution of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) diseases in India J Res ANGRAU 39(4): 44-50. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:85876656
  29. Pinzon-Nunez DA, Adarme-Duran CA, Vargas-Fiallo LY, Rodriguez-Lopez N, Rios-Reyes CA (2022) Biochar as a waste management strategy for cadmium contaminated cocoa pod husk residues. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 11: 101-115. https://doi.org/10.30486/IJROWA.2021.1920124.1192
  30. Pandiselvam R, Shaji A, Ramesh SV, Neenu S, Manikantan MR, Mathew AC (2023) Development, evaluation, and optimization of portable pyrolysis system for the production of biochar from tender coconut husk. Biomass Conv Bioref 14: 19285-19294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-023-03923-5
  31. Pouangam Ngalani G, Ondo JA, Njimou JR, NanseuNjiki CP, Prudent P, Ngameni E (2023) Effect of coffee husk and cocoa pods biochar on phosphorus fixation and release processes in acid soils from West Cameroon. Soil Use Manag 39: 817–832. https://doi.org/10.1111/sum.12894
  32. Poveda J, Martinez-Gomez A, Fenoll C, Escobar C (2021) The use of biochar for plant pathogen control. Phytopathology. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-06-20-0248-RVW
  33. Rozita O, Saiful Mujahid AR, Sharih S (2022) Production of biochar from cocoa pod husk: preliminary result. Malysian Cocoa J 14: 73-76. https://mcj.koko.gov.my/ArticleDetail.aspx?ID=61
  34. Slattery WJ, Ridley AM, Windsor SM (1991) Ash alkalinity of animal and plant products. Aust J Exp Agric 31(3):321. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA9910321
  35. Sujatha S, Bhat R, Chowdappa P (2015) Recycling potential of organic wastes of arecanut and cocoa in India: a short review. Environmental Technology Reviews 4 (1): 91102. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2015.1077897
  36. Tag AT, Duman G, Ucar S, Yanik J (2016) Effects of feedstock type and pyrolysis temperature on potential applications of biochar. J Anal Appl Pyrol 120:200–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2016.05.006
  37. Tomczyk A, Sokołowska Z, Boguta P (2020) Biochar physicochemical properties: pyrolysis temperature and feedstock kind effects. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 19: 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-020-09523-3
  38. Tsai CH, Tsai WT, Liu SC, Lin Y-Q (2018) Thermochemical characterization of biochar from cocoa pod husk prepared at low pyrolysis temperature. Biomass Conv Bioref 8: 237–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-017-0259-5
  39. Vitinaqailevu R, Rajashekhar Rao BK (2019) The role of chemical amendments on modulating ammonia loss and quality parameters of co-composts from waste cocoa pods. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 8 (Suppl 1): 153–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40093-019-0285-3
  40. Walkley AJ, Black IA (1934) Anexamination of the degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 37(1): 29-38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003
  41. Yeboah E, Asamoah G, Kofi B, Abunyewa AA (2016) Effect of biochar type and rate of application on maize yield indices and water use efficiency on an ultisol in Ghana. Energy Procedia 93: 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.07.143