Volume 13, Issue 4, 132437 (1-15)


International Journal of Recycling Organic Waste in Agriculture (IJROWA)


https://dx.doi.org/10.57647/ijrowa-q4g4-q888


Role of organic amendments in improving physiological and yield parameters of okra grown under saline conditions

Alia Naseem

, Sumera Iqbal
, Khajista Jabeen


Department of Botany, Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, Pakistan.

Corresponding author: [email protected]


Original Research

Received:

6 June 2023 Revised:

10 November 2023 Accepted:

21 February 2024 Published online: 6 April 2024

© The Author(s) 2024

Abstract:

Purpose: Salinity is a devastating abiotic stress that poses serious risks to agricultural sustainability and global food security. The yield of okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] is adversely affected by salinity stress. The research was conducted to evaluate the effects of organic amendments on the physiological and yield parameters of okra plants under saline conditions.

Method: In a pot experiment, okra plants were grown in non-saline and saline (50 mM sodium chloride) soil supplemented with municipal solid waste compost, farmyard manure (FYM), and press mud, each applied individually or in various combinations (Compost + FYM, FYM + Press mud and Compost + Press mud). Results: Salinity stress significantly reduced relative water content, membrane stability index, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, photosynthetic rate, fruit length, fruit diameter, no. of fruits per plant, fruit fresh weight, fruit dry weight, fruit yield per plant, no. of seeds per pod and 100 seeds weight of okra plants, compared to control. Under saline conditions, 5% (FYM + Press mud) was the most effective treatment in significantly improving stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide concentration, no. of fruits per plant, fruit dry weight, and fruit yield per plant of okra, compared to saline soil.

Conclusion: Application of 5% (FYM + Press mud) could improve the physiological and yield parameters of okra grown in saline soil (50 mM Sodium chloride) by mitigating adverse effects of salinity and could be used as a cost-effective and bio-rationale approach for alleviation of salinity stress in crops to attain agricultural sustainability.

Keywords: Salinity; Abelmoschus esculentus; Compost; Farmyard manure; Press mud



  1. Introduction

    Salinity stress is one of the critical major limitations to crop yield and growth (Seleiman et al., 2022). It was estimated that 20% of the irrigated lands which contribute to provid- ing 1/3rd of global food production have been affected by salinity (Shahid et al., 2018),endangering food security and agricultural sustainability (Ivushkin et al., 2019b). Salinity stress disturbs nutrient homeostasis and photosynthetic pro- cesses causing a substantial reduction in plant growth and productivity (Singhal et al., 2021; Dustgeer et al., 2021). Salinity stress disrupts the metabolic activities of plants by inducing osmotic stress due to elevated solute concentration and specific ion effect or ion toxicity, instigating oxidative stress in plants (Kamran et al., 2020).

    Due to the deleterious effects of salinity on plants, soil, and the environment, a comprehensive evaluation of tech- niques is imperative to comprehend their role in providing sustainable crop production under stress conditions (Hop- mans et al., 2021). Compared to high-priced inorganic fertilizers, one of the cost-effective methods for reclama- tion of saline-sodic soils is the addition of organic materials (Cha´vez-Garc´ıa and Siebe, 2019).

    Following the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), many developed countries have implemented waste man- agement measures in order to lessen the adverse impacts of waste on humans and the environment (Bernal et al., 2017). The use of recycled organic waste products to improve soil fertility and crop yield has been employed as a conventional


    approach in agriculture for years (Wu et al., 2021). Various organic amendments such as farmyard manure, press mud (Hassan et al., 2021; Khan et al., 2022),and plant wastes have been effectively applied for the remediation of saline soils and improved plant growth (Chen et al., 2021). In spite of the efficacy of organic amendments in the reclamation of agricultural soils and in improving plant yields, there is a dire need to monitor and scrutinize the plant toxicity factor associated with them in order to secure their safe application for the cultivation of crops in saline conditions (Meena et al., 2019).

    Municipal solid waste compost is an efficient source of slow-release nitrogen, phosphorus, and other nutrients that contributes to mitigating the adverse impacts of salinity (Leogrande and Vitti, 2019) by improving fertility and pro- ductivity of saline soils (Oueriemmi et al., 2021). In Pak- istan, the production of municipal solid waste compost from Lahore Waste Management Company was estimated to be 500 tons/day (Azam et al., 2020). Farmyard manure (FYM) is a rich source of macronutrients, trace elements, and mi- croorganisms from the digestive system of animals (Feng et al., 2020). The annual livestock manure production in Pakistan was estimated to be 417.3 million tons in 2018 (Khan et al., 2021).

    Press mud is a by-product of the sugar industry and is used as an effective soil conditioner to enhance the nutrient status of soil (Sher et al., 2022). Press mud is enriched with or- ganic matter, carbonate, sulphate, and lime (Negim, 2016). In addition, it contains sugar, protein, fiber, wax, ash, and oxides of phosphorus, silicon, calcium, magnesium, and other macronutrients (Bhatnagar et al., 2016).

    Press mud can reduce soil pH, electrical conductivity, and exchangeable sodium percentage when applied alone or in combination with other fertilizers (Negim, 2016) and thus could be used for restoration of saline soils (Kumar et al., 2017). The application of press mud as compost resulted in improved productivity of crops (Diaz, 2016). Moreover, the combined application of press mud and cow dung has been found to improve soil nutrient status and provide a favorable environment which contributed to enhanced activ- ity and reproduction of earthworms and also increased the nutrient availability of press mud (Bhat et al., 2016, 2017). The global press mud production was estimated to be 36.8 million tons in 2017 (James, 2020). In Pakistan, the annual production of fresh press mud has reached about 2.7 million t in 2022/2023 (Salman et al., 2023).

    Okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] is an annual vegetable crop of the Malvaceae family which is commonly grown in tropical and subtropical regions of Asia, Africa, America, and Europe (Dantas et al., 2021). Being a rich source of carbohydrates, proteins, minerals, fats, and vita- mins, it is important for the human diet (Farias et al., 2019). In Pakistan, the annual yield of okra has been estimated to be 114 , 657 tons/hectares (Nawaz et al., 2020). In spite of the increased cultivation of okra in Pakistan, it has low yield in many areas due to increased soil and water salinity (Qureshi, 2020). Salinity has a detrimental influence on the yield and physiological parameters of okra plants (Costa et al., 2022; Ali et al., 2022). To fulfill future demand for

    vegetables and ensure global food security, there is a need to develop a sustainable and cost-effective approach for mit- igating the harmful impacts of salinity on okra.

    Although various organic amendments have been employed for increasing crop productivity under saline conditions, yet there is a need to explore whether the application of organic amendments, alone or in a combined form, could improve the yield of okra grown in saline soil. In this perspective, present research was conducted to evaluate the effects of municipal solid waste compost, FYM, and press mud on yield and physiological parameters of okra plants under saline conditions.


  2. Materials and methods

    The pot experiment was performed in the Botanical Garden Department of Botany, Lahore College for Women Uni- versity, Jail Road Lahore, Pakistan, in (April – August) 2021. The plant material used in the experiment was okra [Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench] cv. Swat Green. Okra seeds were acquired from the National Agricultural Research Council, Islamabad (Pakistan), and kept in air tight-bags.

    Before sowing, seeds were sorted out and surface sterilized by immersing in sodium hypochlorite solution (0.2% v/v) for 20 min followed by washing with tap water and then with distilled water. Afterward, the seeds were dried on aseptic filter paper sheets. In total, 14 groups of treatments were arranged in a completely randomized design. Each treatment was replicated 3 times. The soil used in the ex- periment was obtained from a local nursery. The soil was air-dried, sieved (5 mm), and 7 kg of soil was filled in each of the 84 pots. In each pot, 10 okra seeds were sown. In half of the pots, salinity was imposed by adding sodium chloride (analytical grade, Merck, Germany) at 50 mM per pot. The organic amendments of municipal solid waste compost, farmyard manure (FYM), and press mud were applied each @ 5 or 10% per pot and in various combina- tions (Compost + FYM, FYM + Press mud, and Compost

    + Press mud, each amendment applied @ 2.5 or 5% per pot). Municipal solid waste compost was obtained from the Lahore Compost Plant, Lahore (Pakistan). FYM was acquired from a local nursery (Lahore, Pakistan). Press mud was obtained from Choudhury sugar mill, Gojra, Faisalabad (Pakistan). The application of organic amendments was carried out 1 month before seed sowing. The NPK (inor- ganic fertilizer) was applied as super phosphate (5 g/pot), potassium sulfate (25 g/pot), and urea (6 g/pot) in 2 splits before seed sowing. The control plants were left without any treatment. On alternate days, plants were irrigated with tap water. The treatments applied to non-saline and saline soils were controlled, NPK, Municipal solid waste compost (5 or 10%), FYM (5 or 10%), Press mud (5 or 10%), Mu- nicipal solid waste compost + FYM (2.5 or 5%), FYM + Press mud (2.5 or 5%) and Municipal solid waste compost

    + Press mud (2.5 or 5%). Plants were thinned after 2 weeks of seed emergence and 5 plants were left in each pot. For plant sampling, 3 plants were randomly selected from each treatment, cleaned, and preserved in labeled paper bags. Okra leaves from each treatment were used to determine


    the following parameters.

    Determination of relative water content

    To estimate the relative water content (RWC), the method of Weatherley (1950) was followed. Fresh leaf samples (3rd true leaf) from each pot were weighed on a digital weighing balance (Shimadzu EL-600SA, Japan). Leaves were placed in distilled water taken in the petri plates for about 1 hour and their turgid weight was determined. The oven dry weight of leaves was determined after placing them in a drying oven (Hinotech, GX30B WHL-25A, China) at

    70 C for 72 h. The relative water content of leaves was determined using the following equation.

    RWC = [(fresh weight dry weight)

    /(saturated weight dry weight)] × 100

    Determination of membrane stability index

    To determine the membrane stability index (MSI), the method of Premchandra et al. (1990), as modified by Sairam (1994), was followed. Approximately 0.1 g of leaf discs were weighed, rinsed with tap water, and then with double distilled water. Leaf discs were dipped in 10 mL of double distilled water in test tubes and heated in a water bath (TBT

    HH-S4, China) at 40 C for half an hour. After cooling, the electrical conductivity (EC) of water (C1) was recorded

    with an EC meter (wtw inoLab, Germany). The test tubes were again heated in a water bath at 100 C for 10 min. After cooling, the EC of water (C2) was determined again. The membrane stability index of leaves was determined by using the following equation;

    Membrane stability index (MSI) = [1 − (C1/C2)] × 100

    Determination of chlorophyll and carotenoid content The chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of okra leaves were determined following the method of Arnon (1949). About

    0.1 g fresh leaves were ground in a pestle and mortar and

    homogenized with 5 mL of 80% acetone which was pre- pared by mixing 80 mL acetone with 20 mL distilled water. The mixture was centrifuged for 5 min. and the filtrate was transferred to a quartz cuvette. The absorbance of each sample was determined at 663 nm, 645 nm, and 470 nm using a double-beam UV-vis spectrophotometer (Shimadzu UV-2600 BMS, Japan). The chlorophyll and carotenoid contents of leaves were estimated using the Lichtenthaler and Wellburn (1983) formulae given below.

    Chlorophyll a =12.21(A663) − 2.81(A645) Chlorophyll b =20.13(A645) − 5.03(A663)

    Total chlorophyll =20.2(A645) + 8.02(A663) Carotenoid content =[1000 A470 3.27(Chlorophyll a)

    104(Chlorophyll b)]/227

    Chlorophyll content/g plant tissue was calculated by using the following formula.

    C × V/1 × g

    C = pigment concentration (mg L1) V = volume of acetone

    g = weight of leaves

    The chlorophyll a/b ratio was calculated.

    Determination of gas exchange parameters

    For estimation of leaf photosynthesis rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, and intercellular CO2 concentration of okra leaves, a portable Infra-red gas analyzer, (LI-6400 XT LI-COR Inc, Lincoln, NE, USA) was used. The intact leaves from each treatment were placed in the leaf chamber of the instrument. Gas exchange measurements were per- formed from 9.00 to 11.00 AM under these conditions: pho-

    tosynthetically active radiation (PAR) =950 µmol· m2 · s1, leaf chamber temperature = 32-38 C, atmospheric CO2 con- centration = 450 µmol · mol1, and atmospheric pressure = 980 mbars.

    Yield analysis

    After harvest, okra pods were collected and fruit yield per plant and yield-related attributes including fruit length, fruit diameter, number of pods per plant, fresh and dry fruit weights, no. of seeds per pod, and 100 seeds weight were determined. The total no. of fruits/plant was counted and their average was worked out. Okra pod length and diameter were estimated and their average values were calculated. Fresh and dry weights of fruits were determined using a digital weighing balance. Fresh weight of fruit and no. fruits/plant were multiplied together to estimate the fruit yield/plant. Okra plants were sun-dried for a week and pods were collected. The number of seeds in each dry pod sample was counted manually and the weight of 100 seeds from each treatment was determined on a digital weighing balance.

    Statistical analysis

    All the data was statistically analyzed through Statistics (ver. 8.1 User’s Manual, Analytical Software, Tallahassee, FL), using ANOVA (analysis of variance). Means were compared using the Least Significant Difference at p < 0.05.


  3. Results and discussion

    Salinity stress significantly (p < 0.05) reduced relative wa- ter content (59.03%), membrane stability index (44.83%), chlorophyll a (67.21%), chlorophyll b (72.90%), total chlorophyll (72.47%), carotenoid content (73.58%), chloro- phyll a/b (65.92%), and photosynthetic rate (7.90%) of okra plants, compared to control. Under saline conditions, ap- plication of treatments significantly (p < 0.05) improved relative water content (Fig. 1), membrane stability index (Fig. 2), chlorophyll a (Fig.3 ), chlorophyll b (Fig. 4 ), total chlorophyll (Fig. 5), carotenoid content (Fig. 6), chlorophyll a/b (Fig. 7), photosynthetic rate (Fig. 8), transpiration rate (Fig. 9), stomatal conductance (Fig. 10), and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (Fig. 11) of okra plants, com- pared to saline soil.

    Under saline conditions, treatments of 2.5% (Compost + Press mud) and 5% FYM resulted in maximum signifi- cant (p < 0.05) improvement in leaf relative water content (256.83%) and membrane stability index (125.36%) of okra


    Figure 1. Effect of treatments on relative water content of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 2. Effect of treatments on membrane stability index of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 3. Effect of treatments on chlorophyll a of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 4. Effect of treatments on chlorophyll b of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 5. Effect of treatments on total chlorophyll of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 6. Effect of treatments on carotenoid content of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with same the letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 7. Effect of treatments on chlorophyll a/b ratio of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 8. Effect of treatments on photosynthetic rate of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 9. Effect of treatments on the transpiration rate of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 10. Effect of treatments on stomatal conductance of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 11. Effect of treatments on intercellular carbon dioxide concentration of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05.

    (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    leaves, respectively, compared to saline soil.

    The adverse effects of salinity on plants disturbed the min- eral nutrient homeostasis and resulted in declined plant productivity, growth, and photosynthesis (Eissa, 2019). Rel- ative water content (RWC) and membrane stability index (MSI) are the major stress markers for appraisal of salinity impacts on plants (Ashraf et al., 2017). Relative water con- tent is a significant indicator of the water status of plants subjected to salinity and water stress conditions and indi- cates the highest amount of water that turgid leaves can acquire (Khatami et al., 2022). In plants subjected to salin- ity stress, low RWC is caused by decreased water absorption in response to osmotic constraint and stomatal closure due to abscisic acid (Evelin et al., 2019). Similar to the results of the present study, salinity-induced reduction in relative water content has been reported in okra (Ali et al., 2022; Mendonc¸a et al., 2022). However, it was found that the application of organic amendments could increase the RWC of plants under salinity stress by improving soil status and absorption of water (Soni et al., 2016) which is in line with

    the findings of this study.

    The stability of membranes is considered a preventive mea- sure to combat the accumulated free radicals (Isayenkov and Maathuis, 2019). Membrane injury is the foremost impact of salinity stress (Fatima et al., 2021). A higher concen- tration of sodium ions functions as a signaling molecule in transduction channels and contributes to enhancing the reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation (Fatima et al., 2021) and lipid peroxidation (Zhang et al., 2018) which accelerates membrane permeability and results in the ion leakage from cells (Sultan et al., 2021). Similar to the re- sults of the present study, Ansari et al. (2019) observed that the accumulation of salts in various parts of plants caused the deterioration of cell membranes with subsequent re- duction in membrane stability index. It was reported that the addition of calcium-fortified compost could improve the plant water status in maize plants subjected to various levels of salinity stress by enhancing RWC and reducing electrolyte leakage (Niamat et al., 2019).

    Application of 10% Compost was the most effective treat-


    ment which resulted in the maximum significant (p < 0.05) increase in chlorophyll a (334.83%), chlorophyll b (363.79%), total chlorophyll (398.47%) and carotenoid (475%) contents, and chlorophyll a/b ratio (180.24%) of okra leaves, compared to saline soil.

    Salinity stress affects several physiological functions of plants including photosynthesis which is regarded as a sub- stantial and complicated attribute (Allel et al., 2018). The declined photosynthesis under salinity stress is ascribed to the closing of stomata and reduction in chlorophyll content, water potential, internal carbon dioxide concentration, and enzyme activities as well as enhanced accumulation of ROS (Amiri et al., 2016; Kumar et al., 2020). In salinity-stressed

    plants, excess of Na+ ions reduces the chlorophyll content through increased activity of chlorophyll denaturing enzyme

    (chlorophyllase), deterred protein synthesis and distortion of chlorophyll synthesizing enzyme, and pigment-protein complex (Alzahib et al., 2021). As revealed by the results of this study, Ashraf et al. (2019) reported reduced chlorophyll content in okra under saline conditions.

    The improved chlorophyll content by the addition of organic amendments might be a consequence of better soil condi- tions and enhanced absorption of macronutrients (NPK) and magnesium, as magnesium is an integral part of the chlorophyll molecule (Dineshkumar et al., 2020). Similar to the results of this study, the addition of organic amend- ments increased the chlorophyll content in maize under saline conditions (Afzai et al., 2022). In quinoa plants, in- creased carotenoid content after the addition of compost has increased their potential to lessen ROS-induced destruction with subsequent improvement in chlorophyll content (El- Sebai et al., 2016). These results are in line with those of the present study. The supplementation of soil with compost maintains a constant supply of plant vital nutrients during the mineralization process (Mohamed et al., 2020). In addi- tion, the salinity tolerance of plants could be increased by the application of press mud through improved plant water relations, membrane stability, and photosynthetic efficiency (Sheoran et al., 2021).

    Regarding gaseous exchange parameters, under saline con-

    ditions, the maximum significant (p < 0.05) increase in photosynthetic rate (7.18%) and transpiration rate (7.55%) was with application of 5% (Compost + Press mud) and 10% FYM, respectively, compared to saline soil. Under saline conditions, 5% (FYM + Press mud) was the most effective treatment which significantly (p < 0.05) improved the stomatal conductance (140%) and intercellular carbon dioxide concentration (11.07%) in okra leaves, compared to saline soil.

    Parihar et al. (2015) found that reduced water potential could contribute to a decrease in the photosynthetic rates of plants grown in saline medium. The regulation of gaseous exchange in plants occurs through stomata (Fernandes et al., 2022). In order to control the excessive water loss, plants manage to close their stomata. The closing of stomata de- clines the transpiration rates and carbon dioxide fixation as a result of which plants can sustain optimum photosynthetic rates for a limited time (Javed et al., 2017). Higher values of transpiration rates reflect the critical situation of salinity- stressed plants under high water deficit which renders them unable to sustain their growth (Allel et al., 2018). Similar to the results of this study, a reduction in gas exchange param- eters has been reported in okra (Sales et al., 2021; Naqve et al., 2021).

    Salinity significantly (p < 0.05) reduced fruit length

    (57.31%), fruit diameter (44.40%), no. of fruits per plant (71.24%), fruit fresh weight (59.64%), fruit dry weight (68.42%), fruit yield per plant (77.84%), no. of seeds per pod (51.34%), and 100 seeds weight (33.51%) of okra plants, compared to control. Under saline conditions, ap- plication of organic amendments significantly (p < 0.05) improved fruit length (Fig. 12), fruit diameter (Fig. 13), no. of fruits per plant (Fig. 14), fruit fresh weight (Fig. 15), fruit dry weight (Fig. 16), fruit yield per plant (Fig. 17), no. of seeds per pod (Fig. 18), and 100 seeds weight (Fig. 19) of okra, compared to saline soil.

    Under saline conditions, 5% (FYM + Press mud) was the most effective which resulted in the maximum significant (p < 0.05) increase in no. of fruits per plant (646.27%), fruit dry weight (445.83%), and fruit yield per plant (634.31%)


    Figure 12. Effect of treatments on fruit length of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 13. Effect of treatments on fruit diameter of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 14. Effect of treatments on the number of fruits per plant of okra grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 15. Effect of treatments on fruit fresh weight of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 16. Effect of treatments on fruit dry weight of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 17. Effect of treatments on fruit yield per plant of okra grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 18. Effect of treatments on number of seeds per pod of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    Figure 19. Effect of treatments on 100 seeds weight of okra plants grown in saline and non-saline soil.

    Bars represent the standard error of mean and means with the same letters are not significantly different at p < 0.05. (Comp., C = Compost; FYM, F = Farmyard manure; PM, P = Press mud)


    of okra, compared to saline soil. Under saline conditions, the application of 10% Press mud resulted in the highest significant (p < 0.05) increase in fruit diameter (118.43%) and fruit fresh weight (259.34%) of okra plants, compared to saline soil. While the maximum significant (p < 0.05) increase in no. of seeds per pod (292.31%), fruit length (233.25%), and 100 seeds weight (67.90%) of okra plants were obtained after applying 5% Press mud, 2.5% (FYM + Press mud) and NPK, respectively, compared to saline soil. Low productivity of many valuable crops is a consequence of salinity (Ivushkin et al., 2019a). The osmotic and ionic stresses caused by salinity disturb nutrient absorption and antioxidant defense mechanisms in the cytoplasm, causing oxidative injury which restricts growth and declines pro- ductivity of crops (Hussain et al., 2018). According to Ren et al. (2019),the collapse of natural reserves by salinity re- sulted in low crop production. Salinity-induced reduction in okra yield has been reported (Motamedi et al., 2021; Costa et al., 2022).Azhar et al. (2019)evaluated that press mud could decrease the absorption of toxic ions and enhance crop productivity due to improved availability of nutrients and organic matter which is in accordance with the results of this study. A similar increase in crop yield was observed by Mbarki et al. (2020) in alfalfa, after applying compost and farmyard manure. In addition to improved soil fertility and crop yield, the application of farmyard manure and cow manure to saline soils was found a harmless measure for improved salinity tolerance of crops (Baddour et al., 2017). In this respect, further research is required to explore the underlying mechanisms of the positive impacts of organic amendments on salinity-stressed plants.

  4. Conclusion

In this study, salinity stress significantly reduced relative water content, membrane stability index, chlorophyll and carotenoid contents, photosynthetic rate, fruit length, fruit diameter, no. of fruits per plant, fruit fresh weight, fruit dry weight, fruit yield per plant, no. of seeds per pod, and 100 seeds weight of okra plants, compared to control. Under saline conditions, 5% (FYM + Press mud) was

the most effective organic amendment in significantly improving stomatal conductance, intercellular carbon dioxide concentration, no. of fruits per plant, fruit dry weight, and fruit yield per plant of okra, compared to saline soil. The application of 5% (FYM + Press mud) to saline soil (50 mM NaCl) could be recommended as a low-cost and eco-friendly measure to improve okra yield by ameliorating the adverse effects of salinity. The research ensures the recycling of organic wastes and promotes organic agriculture for the support of small-scale farmers due to the utilization of locally available waste products as organic amendments to alleviate salinity stress in crops.


Acknowledgments

The author thanks the National Agricultural Research Council Islamabad, for providing okra seed.


Author contribution

A.N. performed the experimental work and wrote the manuscript. S.I. designed and supervised the practical work and paper write-up. K.J. assisted in experimental procedures and data analysis.


Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they are no conflict of interest associated with this study.


Open Access

This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a



credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the OICCPress publisher. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0.

References

Afzai U, Khan I, Chattha MU, Maqbool R, Chattha MB, Naz A, Hashem M, et al. (2022) Organic amendments mitigate salinity induced toxic effects in maize by mod- ulating antioxidant defense system, photosynthetic pig- ments and ionic homeostasis. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca 50 (2): 12735. https://doi.org/10.15835/ nbha50212735

Ali M, Abbasi GH, Ahmad S, Ameen M, Rehman S, Irfan M, Iqbal R (2022) Enhancement in okra (Abelmoschus esculentus) growth performance under salt stress us- ing exogeneous application of L- tryptophan. J Plant Environ 4 (1): 19–26. https://doi.org/10.33687/jpe.004.

01.4144

Allel D, Ben-Amar A, Abdelly C (2018) Leaf photosynthe- sis, chlorophyll fluorescence and ion content of barley (Hordeum vulgare) in response to salinity. J Plant Nutr 41 (4): 497–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.

2017.1385811

Alzahib RH, Migdadi HM, Ghamdi AA Al, Alwahibi MS, Ibrahim AA, Al-Selwey WA (2021) Assessment of morpho-physiological, biochemical and antioxidant responses of tomato landraces to salinity stress. Plants 10 (4): 696. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10040696

Amiri A, Baninasab B, Ghobadi C, Khoshgoftarmanesh AH (2016) Zinc soil application enhance photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant enzyme activities in almond seedlings affected by salinity stress. Photosynthetica 54 (2): 267–274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-016-

0078-0

Ansari M, Shekari F, Mohammadi MH, Juhos K, Ve´gva´ri G, Biro´ B (2019) Salt-tolerant plant growth-promoting bacteria enhanced salinity tolerance of salt-tolerant alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) cultivars at high salinity. Acta Physiol Plant 41 (12): 195. https://doi.org/10. 1007/s11738-019-2988-5

Arnon DI (1949) Copper enzymes in isolated chloroplasts, polyphenol oxidase in Beta vulgaris L. Plant Physiol 24 (1): 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.24.1.1

Ashraf M, Shahzad SM, Akhtar N, Imtiaz M, Ali A (2017) Salinization/sodification of soil and physiological dy- namics of sunflower irrigated with saline-sodic water amending by potassium and farm yard manure. J Water Reuse Desalin 7 (4): 476–487. https://doi.org/10.2166/ wrd.2016.053

Ashraf MA, Asma HF, Iqbal M (2019) Exogenous mena- dione sodium bisulfite mitigates specific ion toxicity and oxidative damage in salinity stressed okra (Abel- moschus esculentus Moench). Acta Physiol Plant 41

(12): 187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-019-2978-7

Azam M, Jahromy SS, Raza W, Raza N, Lee SS, Kim KH, Winter F (2020) Status, characterization, and potential utilization of municipal solid waste as renewable en- ergy source: Lahore case study in Pakistan. Environ Int 134:105291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.

105291

Azhar M, Rehman MZ, Ali S, Qayyum MF, Naeem A, Ayub MA, Haq MA, Iqbal A, Rizwan M (2019) Com- parative effectiveness of different biochars and conven- tional organic materials on growth, photosynthesis and cadmium accumulation in cereals. Chemosphere 227 (1-2): 72–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.

2019.04.041

Baddour AG, Rashwan E, El-Sharkawy T (2017) Effect of organic manure, antioxidant and proline on corn (Zea mays L.) grown under saline conditions. Env Biodivers Soil Secur 1:203–217. https://doi.org/10.21608/jenvbs. 2018.2513.1021

Bernal MP, Sommer SG, Chadwick D, Qing C, Guoxue L, Michel FC (2017) Current approaches and future trends in compost quality criteria for agronomic, envi- ronmental, and human health benefits. In Donald LS (Ed) Advances in Agronomy, Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherlands 144:143–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs. agron.2017.03.002

Bhat SA, Singh J, Vig AP (2017) Amelioration and degrada- tion of pressmud and bagasse wastes using vermitech- nology. Bioresour Technol 243:1097–1104. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.093

(2016) Effect on growth of earthworm and chemi- cal parameters during vermicomposting of press mud sludge mixed with cattle dung mixture. Procedia Envi- ron Sci 35 (2016): 425–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. proenv.2016.07.025

Bhatnagar A, Kesari KK, Shurpali N (2016) Multidisci- plinary approaches to handling wastes in sugar in- dustries. Water Air Soil Pollut 227 (1): 1–30. https:

//doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2705-y

Chen M, Zhang S, Liu L, Wu L, Ding X (2021) Combined organic amendments and mineral fertilizer application increase rice yield by improving soil structure, P avail- ability and root growth in saline-alkaline soil. Soil Tillage Res 212:105060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still. 2021.105060

Cha´vez-Garc´ıa E, Siebe C (2019) Rehabilitation of a highly saline-sodic soil using a rubble barrier and organic amendments. Soil Tillage Res 189:176–188. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.01.003


Costa JPBM, Oliveira FA, Santos ST dos, Oliveira MKT, Marques ICS, Cordeiro CJX, Go´is HMMN (2022) Okra salt stress reduction under potassium fertigation. Hortic Bras 40 (4): 360–366. https://doi.org/10.1590/ s0102-0536-20220402

Dantas TL, Buriti FC Alonso, Florentino ER (2021) Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.) as a potential functional food source of mucilage and bioactive compounds with technological applications and health benefits. Plants 10 (8): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10081683

Diaz P (2016) Consequences of compost press mud as fer- tilizers. DJ Int J Adv Microbiol Res 1 (1): 28–32. https:

//doi.org/10.18831/djmicro.org/2016011005

Dineshkumar R, Subramanian J, Arumugam A, Rasheeq AA, Sampathkumar P (2020) Exploring the microal- gae biofertilizer effect on onion cultivation by field experiment. Waste Biomass Valorization 11 (1): 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0466-8

Dustgeer Z, Seleiman MF, Khan I, Chattha MU, Alhammad BA, Jalal RS, et al. (2021) Glycine-betaine induced salinity tolerance in maize by regulating the physiolog- ical attributes, antioxidant defense system and ionic homeostasis. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca 49

(1): 12248. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha49112248

Eissa MA (2019) Effect of cow manure biochar on heavy metals uptake and translocation by zucchini (Cucurbita pepo L). Arab J Geosci 12 (2): 1–10. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s12517-018-4191-1

El-Sebai TN, Allah MMS Abd, El-Bassiouny HMS, Ibrahim FM (2016) Amelioration of the adverse effects of salin- ity stress by using compost, Nigella sativa extract or Ascorbic acid in Quinoa plants. Int J Pharm Tech Res 9 (6): 127–144.

Evelin H, Devi TS, Gupta S, Kapoor R (2019) Mitigation of salinity stress in plants by arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis: Current understanding and new challenges. Front Plant Sci 10:470. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls. 2019.00470

Farias DBS, Silva PSO da, Lucas AAT, Freitas MI de, San- tos TJ, Fontes PTN, Oliveira Ju´nior LFG de (2019) Physiological and productive parameters of the okra under irrigation levels. Sci Hortic 252:1–6. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.scienta.2019.02.066

Fatima A, Hussain S, Hussain S, Ali B, Ashraf U, Zulfiqar U, Hano C, et al. (2021) Differential morphophysiolog- ical, biochemical, and molecular responses of maize hybrids to salinity and alkalinity stresses. Agronomy 11

(6): 1150. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11061150

Feng L, Perschke YML, Fontaine D, Nikolausz M, Ward AJ, Rocha UN da, et al. (2020) Anaerobic digestion of co-ensiled cover crop and barley straw: effect of co-ensiling ratios, manure addition and impact on mi- crobial community structure. Ind Crops Prod 144 (4): 112025. https : / / doi .org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2019 . 112025

Fernandes CDS, Ferreira-Neto M, Dias NDS, Reges LBL, Silva LDA, Moreira RCL, Silva AA´ da, Paiva EP de, Fernandes PD, FVDS Sa´ (2022) The appropriate source of nitrogen for Italian Zucchini under salt stress conditions. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 22:560–570. https:

//doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00668-w

Hassan MU, Aamer M, Chattha MU, Haiying T, Khan I, Seleiman MF, Aslam MT, et al. (2021) Sugarcane distillery spent wash (dsw) as a bio-nutrient supple- ment: a win-win option for sustainable crop produc- tion. Agronomy 11 (1): 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/ agronomy11010183

Hopmans JW, Qureshi AS, Kisekka I, Munns R, Grattan SR, Rengasamy P, Ben-Gal A, Assouline S, Javaux M, Minhas PS, et al. (2021) Critical knowledge gaps and research priorities in global soil salinity. Adv Agron 169:1–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2021.03.

001

Hussain M, Ahmad S, Hussain S, Lal R, Ul-Allah S, Nawaz A (2018) Rice in saline soils: Physiology, biochemistry, genetics, and management. Adv Agron 148:231–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2017.11.002

Isayenkov SV, Maathuis FJ (2019) Plant salinity stress: Many unanswered questions remain. Front Plant Sci 10:80. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00080

Ivushkin K, Bartholomeus H, Bregt AK, Pulatov A, Frances- chini MHD, Kramer H, Loo EN van, Roman VJ, Finkers R (2019a) UAV based soil salinity assessment of cropland. Geoderma 338:502–512. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.046

Ivushkin K, Bartholomeus H, Bregt AK, Pulatov A, Kem- pen B, Sousa L De (2019b) Global mapping of soil salinity change. Remote Sens Environ 231:111260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111260

James J (2020) Sugarcane press mud modification of expan- sive soil stabilized at optimum lime content: Strength, mineralogy and microstructural investigation. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 12 (2): 395–402. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.jrmge.2019.10.005

Javed Q, Wu Y, Xing D, Azeem A, Ullah I, Zaman M (2017) Re-watering: An effective measure to recover growth and photosynthetic characteristics in salt-stressed Bras- sica napus L. Chil J Agric Res 77 (1): 78–86. https:

//doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392017000100010


Kamran M, Parveen A, Ahmar S, Malik Z, Hussain S, Chattha MS, Saleem MH, Adil M, Heidari P, Chen JT (2020) An overview of hazardous impacts of soil salinity in crops, tolerance mechanisms and amelio- ration through Selenium supplementation- A review. Int J Mol Sci 21 (1): 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/ ijms21010148

Khan I, Muhammad A, Chattha MU, Skalicky M, Chattha MB, Ayub MA, Brestic M, et al. (2022) Mitigation of salinity induced oxidative damage, growth and yield reduction in fine rice by sugarcane press-mud appli- cation. Front Plant Sci 13:840900. https://doi.org/10. 3389/fpls.2022.840900

Khan MU, Ahmad M, Sultan M, Sohoo I, Ghimire PC, Za- hid A, Sarwar A, et al. (2021) Biogas production poten- tial from livestock manure in Pakistan. Sustainability 13 (12): 6751. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126751

Khatami SA, Kasraie P, Oveysi M, Moghadam HRT, Ghooshchi F (2022) Mitigating the adverse effects of salinity stress on lavender using biodynamic prepa- rations and bio-fertilizers. Ind Crops Prod 183 (1): e114985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022 . 114985

Kumar A, Singh S, Gaurav AK, Srivastava S, Verma JP (2020) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: Biological tools for the mitigation of salinity stress in plants. Front Microbiol 11:1216. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb. 2020.01216

Kumar S, Meena RS, Jinger D, Jatav HS, Banjara T (2017) Use of pressmud compost for improving crop produc- tivity and soil health. Int J Chem Stud 5 (2): 384–389.

Leogrande R, Vitti C (2019) Use of organic amendments to reclaim saline and sodic soils: A review. Arid Land Res Manag 33 (8): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 15324982.2018.1498038

Lichtenthaler HK, Wellburn AR (1983) Determination of total carotenoids and cholorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem Soc Trans 11

(5): 591–592. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591

Mbarki S, Skalicky M, Talbi O, Chakraborty A, Hnilicka F, Hejnak V, Zivcak M, Brestic M, Cerda A, Abdelly C (2020) Performance of Medicago sativa grown in clay soil favored by compost or farmyard manure to mitigate salt stress. Agronomy 10 (1): 94.1–14. https:

//doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10010094

Meena MD, Yadav RK, Narjary B, Yadav G, Jat HS, She- oran P, Meena MK, Antil RS, Meena BL, Singh HV (2019) Municipal solid waste (MSW): Strategies to im- prove salt affected soil sustainability: A review. Waste Manage 84:38–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.

2018.11.020

Mendonc¸a AJT, Silva AAR da, Lima GS de, Soares LAdA, Oliveira VKN, Gheyi HR, Lacerda CF CF de, Azevedo CAV de, Lima VLA de, Fernandes PD (2022) Sali- cylic acid modulates okra tolerance to salt stress in hydroponic system. Agriculture 12 (10): 1687. https:

//doi.org/10.3390/agriculture12101687

Mohamed OZ, Yassine B, Rania EH, Hassan A El, Ab- dellatif H, Rachid B (2020) Evaluation of compost quality and bioprotection potential against Fusarium wilt of date palm. Waste Manage 113:12–19. https:

//doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.05.035

Motamedi M, Azizpour K, Sarabi V, Kamran RV (2021) Effects of salinity stress caused by different levels of NaCl on okra. Genet Eng Biosaf J 10 (1): 51–60. https:

//dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.25885073.1400.10.1.5.5

Naqve M, Wang X, Shahbaz M, Mahmood A, Bibi S, Fiaz S (2021) Alpha Tocopherol-induced modulations in the morphophysiological attributes of okra under saline conditions. Front Plant Sci 12:800251. https://doi.org/ 10.3389/fpls.2021.800251

Nawaz A, Ali H, Sufyan M, Gogi MD, Arif MJ, Ali A, Qasim M, Islam W, Ali N, Bodla I, et al. (2020) In- vitro assessment of food consumption, utilization in- dices and losses promises of leafworm, Spodoptera litura (Fab.), on okra crop. J Asia-Pac Entomol 23:60–

66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aspen.2019.10.015

Negim O (2016) Effect of addition pressmud and gypsum by product to reclamation of highly calcareous saline sodic soil. Am Assoc Sci Technol J Environ 1 (4): 76– 84.

Niamat B, Naveed M, Ahmad Z, Yaseen M, Ditta A, Mustafa A, Rafique M, Bibi R, Sun N, Xu M (2019) Calcium-enriched animal manure alleviates the ad- verse effects of salt stress on growth, physiology and nutrients homeostasis of Zea mays L. Plants 8:1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants8110480

Oueriemmi H, Kidd PS, Trasar-Cepeda C, Rodriguez- Garrido B, Zoghlami RI, Ardhaoui K, Prieto- Ferna´ndez A´ , Moussa M (2021) Evaluation of com- posted organic wastes and farmyard manure for im- proving fertility of poor sandy soils in arid regions. Agriculture 11 (5): 415. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 3390 / agriculture11050415

Parihar P, Singh S, Singh R, Singh VP, Prasad SM (2015) Effect of salinity stress on plants and its tolerance strategies: a review. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22 (6): 4056–4075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356- 014-

3739-1

Premchandra GS, Saneoka H, Ogata S (1990) Cell mem- brane stability, an indicator of drought tolerance as affected by applied nitrogen in soybean. J Agric Sci Cambridge 115 (1): 63–66. https://doi.org/10.1017/ s0021859600073925


Qureshi AS (2020) Groundwater governance in Pakistan: From colossal development to neglected management. Water 12 (11): 3017. https : / / doi . org / 10 . 3390 / w 12113017

Ren Y, Wang W, He J, Zhang L, Wei Y, Yang M (2019) Nitric oxide alleviates salt stress in seed germination and early seedling growth of pakchoi (Brassica chinen- sis L.) by enhancing physiological and biochemical parameters. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 187:109785. https:

//doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109785

Sairam RK (1994) Effect of moisture stress on physiological activities of two contrasting wheat genotypes. Indian J Exp Biol 32:594–597.

Sales JRS, Magalhaˆes CL, Freitas AGS, Goes GF, Sousa HC de, Sousa GG de (2021) Physiological indices of okra under organomineral fertilization and irrigated with salt water. Rev Bras Eng Agr´ıc Ambient 25 (7): 466–471. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi. v25n7p466-471

Salman M, Inamullah, Jamal A, Mihoub A, Saeed MF, Radicetti E, Ahmad I, Naeem A, Ullah J, Pampana S (2023) Composting sugarcane filter mud with different sources differently benefits sweet maize. Agronomy 13

(3): 748. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13030748

Seleiman MF, Aslam MT, Alhammad BA, Hassan MU, Maqbool R, Chattha MU, Battaglia ML, et al. (2022) Salinity stress in wheat: Effects, mechanisms and man- agement strategies. Phyton-Int J Exp Bot 91 (4): 667–

694. https://doi.org/10.32604/phyton.2022.017365

Shahid SA, Zaman M, Heng L (2018) Soil salinity: His- torical perspectives and a world overview of the prob- lem. In guideline for salinity assessment, mitigation and adaptation using nuclear and related techniques. Springer, 43–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-

96190-3

Sheoran P, Basak N, Kumar A, Yadav RK, Singh R, Sharma R, Kumar S, Singh RK, Sharma PC (2021) Amelio- rants and salt tolerant varieties improve rice-wheat production in soils undergoing solidification with al- kali water irrigation in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Agric Water Manag 243:106492. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.agwat.2020.106492

Sher A, Adnan M, Sattar A, Ul-Allah S, Ijaz M, Hassan MU, Gharib AF, et al. (2022) Combined application of organic and inorganic amendments improved the yield and nutritional quality of forage sorghum. Agronomy 12 (4): 896. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy120408

96

Singhal RK, Saha D, Skalicky M, Mishra UN, Chauhan J, Behera LP, et al. (2021) Crucial cell signaling com- pounds crosstalk and integrative multi-omics tech- niques for salinity stress tolerance in plants. Front Plant Sci 12:670369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls. 2021.670369

Soni PG, Yadav RK, Kumar A, Kumar R, Datt C, Paul K, Kumar G (2016) Sorghum fodder production and its nutrient composition under different residual sodium carbonate levels in irrigation water. Indian J Anim Nutr 33 (3): 345–349. https://doi.org/10.5958/2231- 6744.2016.00061.X

Sultan I, Khan I, Chattha MU, Hassan MU, Barbanti L, Calone R, Izzat W, et al. (2021) Improved salinity tolerance in early growth stage of maize through sali- cylic acid foliar application. Ital J Agron 16 (3): 1810. https://doi.org/10.4081/ija.2021.1810

Weatherley PE (1950) Studies in the water relations of the cotton plant. I. The field measurement of water deficits in leaves. New Phytol 49 (1): 81–87. https://doi.org/10. 1111/j.1469-8137.1950.tb05146.x

Wu X, Peng J, Liu P, Bei Q, Rensing C, Li Y, Yuan H, Lie- sack W, Zhang F, Cui Z (2021) Metagenomic insights into nitrogen and phosphorus cycling at the soil aggre- gate scale driven by organic material amendments. Sci Total Environ 785:147329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. scitotenv.2021.147329

Zhang W, Wang C, Lu T, Zheng Y (2018) Cooperation between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and earthworms promotes the physiological adaptation of maize under a high salt stress. Plant Soil 423(1-2):125–140. https:

//doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3481-9