<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>OICC Press</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2251-6832</Issn>
<Volume>8</Volume>
<Issue>3 (September 2017)</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>06</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Flowrate and water presence effect on venting/SVE process efficiency</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
<FirstPage></FirstPage>
<LastPage></LastPage>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.1007/s40095-017-0238-4</ELocationID>
<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
<FirstName>Mariem</FirstName>
<LastName>Kacem</LastName>
<Affiliation>Univ Lyon, Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieurs de Saint-Etienne, Laboratoire de Tribologie et Dynamique des Systèmes LTDS UMR 5513 CNRS, Saint-Etienne, 42023, FR</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID"></Identifier>
</Author>
<Author>
<FirstName>Daoud</FirstName>
<LastName>Esrael</LastName>
<Affiliation>Déchets Eaux Environnement Pollutions DEEP, INSA -Lyon 20, Villeurbanne, 69621, FR</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID"></Identifier>
</Author>
<Author>
<FirstName>Belkacem</FirstName>
<LastName>Benadda</LastName>
<Affiliation>Déchets Eaux Environnement Pollutions DEEP, INSA -Lyon 20, Villeurbanne, 69621, FR</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID"></Identifier>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
<History>
<PubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2017</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>06</Day>
</PubDate>
</History>
<Abstract>Abstract
The objective of this paper is to study the effect of the soil water content “SWC” and flowrate on Venting and Soil Vapor Extraction “SVE” process efficiency. Two experiments simulating venting process and SVE process were done on sand column. Two sand water contents were tested: low SWC (7.6%) and a dry one, at low flowrate (600 mL min
−1
) and high flowrate (3200 mL min
−1
). Results show that the efficiency is better at low flowrate and dry sand whatever the process used (96.7%). It decreases with the water saturation and flowrate increases to reach 92.4%. The good efficiency, when low flowrate is applied, needs more time application (500 min) than when high flowrate is applied (300 min) for about 2.5% efficiency win. The presence of water and the low flowrate become more difficult than the contaminant extraction in the tailing part. It has been demonstrated the diffusional nature of this part and then the interest to introduce, in this step, other technics like the discontinued extraction, particularly for dry soil and high flowrate, where efficiency was improved by 1.3%. The utility of the optimal treatment time determination has been demonstrated to save the application time.</Abstract>
<ObjectList>
<Object Type="keyword">
<Param Name="value">PLNA/gas mass transfer</Param>
</Object>
<Object Type="keyword">
<Param Name="value">Flowrate</Param>
</Object>
<Object Type="keyword">
<Param Name="value">SWC</Param>
</Object>
<Object Type="keyword">
<Param Name="value">SVE</Param>
</Object>
<Object Type="keyword">
<Param Name="value">Tailing</Param>
</Object>
</ObjectList>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>