10.1007/s40095-017-0255-3

Assessment of the thermal enhancement methods in parabolic trough collectors

Show Details XML HTML PDF
  • Evangelos Bellos*1,
  • Christos Tzivanidis1,
  1. Thermal Department, School of Mechanical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, 157 73, GR
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2017-11-29

How to Cite

Bellos, E., & Tzivanidis, C. (2017). Assessment of the thermal enhancement methods in parabolic trough collectors. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 9(1 (March 2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-017-0255-3
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 42

PDF views: 136

Abstract

Abstract Parabolic trough collector is an emerging solar technology for achieving the sustainability. Numerous studies have been focused on their performance evaluation and many techniques have been suggested for improving their thermal efficiency. The objective of this paper is to determine the impact of various thermal enhancement techniques on the thermal efficiency improvement of the PTC. The most usual techniques for increasing the thermal performance of parabolic trough collectors are the use of inserts, internal fins, metallic foams and the dimpled absorbers. A parametric analysis is conducted using different values of the thermal enhancement ratio (Nusselt number to the Nusselt number of the smooth absorber case). According to the final results, the thermal efficiency enhancement can reach up to 2% when the Nusselt number is about 2.5 times greater compared to the reference case and the inlet temperature is equal to 600 K. Moreover, in this case, the thermal losses are approximately 22% lower than in the respective reference case. For higher Nusselt number ratios, the thermal enhancement presents relatively small increase. This analysis is performed with a developed thermal model in Engineering Equation Solver (EES) which is validated with the literature results.

Keywords

  • PTC,
  • Thermal enhancement,
  • Nusselt number,
  • Performance assessment
HTML PDF

References

  1. Zagba et al. (2016) A combined simulation and experimental analysis the dynamic performance of a 2 kW photovoltaic plant installed in the desert environment (pp. 249-260) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-016-0216-2
  2. Al Mamum et al. (2016) Techno-financial analysis and design of on-board intelligent-assisting system for a hybrid solar–DEG-powered boat (pp. 361-376) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-016-0218-0
  3. Bellos and Tzivanidis (2017) Energetic and financial sustainability of solar assisted heat pump heating systems in Europe (pp. 70-84) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.05.020
  4. Jelley and Smith (2015) Concentrated solar power: recent developments and future challenges 229(7) (pp. 693-713) https://doi.org/10.1177/0957650914566895
  5. Grosu et al. (2016) Exergy analysis of a solar combined cycle: organic Rankine cycle and absorption cooling system (pp. 449-459) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-015-0168-y
  6. Bellos et al. (2016) Exergetic and energetic comparison of LiCl-HO and LiBr-HO working pairs in a solar absorption cooling system (pp. 453-461) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.06.068
  7. Sabiha et al. (2015) Progress and latest developments of evacuated tube solar collectors (pp. 1038-1054) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.016
  8. Pintaldi et al. (2017) Energetic evaluation of thermal energy storage options for high efficiency solar cooling systems (pp. 160-177) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.11.123
  9. Tzivanidis et al. (2016) Energetic and financial investigation of a stand-alone solar-thermal Organic Rankine cycle power plant (pp. 421-433) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.033
  10. Rovira et al. (2016) Analysis and comparison of Integrated Solar Combined Cycles using parabolic troughs and linear Fresnel reflectors as concentrating systems (pp. 990-1000) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.11.001
  11. Bellos and Tzivanidis (2017) Parametric analysis and optimization of an Organic Rankine Cycle with nanofluid based solar parabolic trough collectors (pp. 1376-1393) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.06.055
  12. Buehler, R., Yang, S., Ordonez, J.C.: Heat transfer fluids for parabolic trough solar collectors—a comparative study, In: Proceedings of “2016 IEEE Conference on Technologies for Sustainability—SusTech”, At Phoenix, Arizona (2016)
  13. Fuqiang et al. (2017) Progress in concentrated solar power technology with parabolic trough collector system: a comprehensive review (pp. 1314-1328) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.174
  14. Bellos et al. (2016) The use of gas working fluids in parabolic trough collectors—an energetic and exergetic analysis (pp. 1-14) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.043
  15. Bellos et al. (2017) A detailed working fluid investigation for solar parabolic trough collectors (pp. 374-386) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.11.201
  16. Coventry et al. (2015) A review of sodium receiver technologies for central receiver solar power plants (pp. 749-762) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.09.023
  17. Sandeep and Arunachala (2017) Solar parabolic trough collectors: a review on heat transfer augmentation techniques (pp. 1218-1231) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.242
  18. Price et al. (2002) Advances in parabolic trough solar power technology 124(2) (pp. 109-125) https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1467922
  19. Xiangtao et al. (2017) Heat transfer enhancement analysis of tube receiver for parabolic trough solar collector with pin fin arrays inserting (pp. 185-202) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.01.020
  20. Benabderrahmane et al. (2016) Heat transfer enhancement in a parabolic trough solar receiver using longitudinal fins and nanofluids (pp. 410-417) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11630-016-0878-3
  21. Bellos et al. (2017) Energetic and exergetic investigation of a parabolic trough collector with internal fins operating with carbon dioxide 8(2) (pp. 109-122) https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-017-0229-5
  22. Bellos et al. (2017) The impact of internal longitudinal fins in parabolic trough collectors operating with gases (pp. 35-54) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.057
  23. Wang et al. (2016) Heat transfer performance enhancement and thermal strain restrain of tube receiver for parabolic trough solar collector by using asymmetric outward convex corrugated tube (pp. 275-292) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.08.013
  24. Bellos et al. (2016) Thermal enhancement of solar parabolic trough collectors by using nanofluids and converging-diverging absorber tube (pp. 213-222) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.062
  25. Huang et al. (2017) Numerical investigations on fully-developed mixed turbulent convection in dimpled parabolic trough receiver tubes (pp. 1287-1299) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.10.012
  26. Kumar and Reddy (2009) Thermal analysis of solar parabolic trough with porous disc receiver (pp. 1804-1812) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.11.007
  27. Mwesigye et al. (2016) Heat transfer and entropy generation in a parabolic trough receiver with wall-detached twisted tape inserts (pp. 238-257) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2015.08.015
  28. Jaramillo et al. (2016) Parabolic trough solar collector for low enthalpy processes: an analysis of the efficiency enhancement by using twisted tape inserts (pp. 125-141) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.02.046
  29. Too and Benito (2013) Enhancing heat transfer in air tubular absorbers for concentrated solar thermal applications 50(1) (pp. 1076-1083) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2012.06.025
  30. Wang et al. (2013) Numerical study of heat transfer enhancement in the receiver tube of direct steam generation with parabolic trough by inserting metal foams (pp. 449-460) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.07.026
  31. Behar et al. (2015) A novel parabolic trough solar collector model—Validation with experimental data and comparison to Engineering Equation Solver (EES) (pp. 268-281) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.09.045
  32. Leinhard and Leinhard (2012) Philogiston Press
  33. Forristall (2003) National Renewable Energy Laboratory—NREL https://doi.org/10.2172/15004820
  34. Qiu et al. (2017) Thermal performance analysis of a parabolic trough solar collector using supercritical CO2 as heat transfer fluid under non-uniform solar flux (pp. 1255-1265) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.044
  35. Swinbank (1963) Long-wave radiation from clear skies (pp. 339-340) https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49708938105
  36. Petela (2003) Exergy of undiluted thermal radiation 74(6) (pp. 469-488) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-092X(03)00226-3
  37. http://www.loikitsdistribution.com/files/syltherm-800-technical-data-sheet.pdf
  38. . Accessed 15 May 2017
  39. F-Chart Software, Engineering Equation Solver (EES).
  40. http://www.fchart.com/ees
  41. (2015). Accessed 15 May 2017
  42. Bellos and Tzivanidis (2017) Parametric investigation of nanofluids utilization in parabolic trough collectors (pp. 71-79) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsep.2017.05.001
  43. Bellos and Tzivanidis (2017) A detailed exergetic analysis of parabolic trough collectors (pp. 275-292) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.07.035
  44. Bellos et al. (2017) Multi-criteria evaluation of parabolic trough collector with internally finned absorbers (pp. 540-561) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.141
  45. Bellos et al. (2017) Thermal enhancement of parabolic trough collector with internally finned absorbers (pp. 514-531) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.067