10.57647/gcr-2024-si-k4g1

Museal Activity to Promote Geotourism and Geosite Protection: The Case of the National Ceramics Museum, Safi, Morocco

PDF HTML
  • Mustapha El Hamidy*1,
  • Ezzoura Errami1,
  • Mukhtiar Ghani2,
  1. Governance of Territoires and Societies Research Team (GOTS), Polydisciplinary Faculty, Safi, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco
  2. Museum of Earth Science, Geological Survey of Pakistan, HQs, Balochistan, Quetta, Pakistan
Museal Activity to Promote Geotourism and Geosite Protection: The Case of the National Ceramics Museum, Safi, Morocco
Categories

Received: 2024-02-27

Revised: 2024-05-27

Accepted: 2024-07-10

Published 2024-12-03

Copyright (c) 2024 @Authors

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

El Hamidy, M., Errami, E. ., & Ghani, M. (2024). Museal Activity to Promote Geotourism and Geosite Protection: The Case of the National Ceramics Museum, Safi, Morocco. Geoconservation Research, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.57647/gcr-2024-si-k4g1
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

PDF views: 77

HTML views: 7

Abstract

Museums, as significant actors in their respective areas, face the challenge of evolving beyond being mere repositories of heritage. They are increasingly expected to serve as instrumental contributors to balanced human development and overall societal well-being. This includes actively participating in cultural tourism and geotourism initiatives, which are essential components of broader efforts to enhance collective welfare. This study explores the role of museums in promoting geotourism and preserving geological heritage, using the National Ceramics Museum in Safi, Morocco (NCMSM) as an example. Experts agreed on the potential of museums to promote geotourism and protect geosites through a variety of activities, including geosite visits, educational programs, interpretive panels, geotours, awareness campaigns, souvenir offers, and interactive applications. These initiatives can effectively raise awareness, foster appreciation, and support the conservation of geosites, while also contributing to the development of sustainable geotourism practices. Statistically, amongst the listed activities at NCMSM, the pottery workshops are the most recommended activity as they appeal to people of all ages and levels. The ceramic-rich heritage at NCMSM is encouraged to take a holistic approach, ensuring a wider impact on public understanding, engagement, and preservation efforts.

Keywords

  • Ceramics,
  • Conservation,
  • Geoheritage,
  • Geotourism,
  • Museum,
  • Morocco,
  • Safi
PDF HTML

References

  1. Arharbi R, Lenoir É (2011). Recherches archéologiques franco-marocaines à Banasa (Maroc). Les Nouvelles de l'Archéologie. 124: 21–24. https://doi.org/10.4000/nda.1416
  2. Brilha J (2016). Inventory and quantitative assessment of geosites and geodiversity sites: A review. Geoheritage. 8: 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3
  3. Brilha J (2018). Geoheritage and Geoparks. In Geoheritage: Assessment, Protection, and Management; Reynard E, José B, Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, pp. 323–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.05.001
  4. Boualla O, Mehdi K (2011). Grotte El Goraan: des atouts pour un site touristique. In: Errami E, Andrianaivo L, Ennih N, Gauly M, The first international conference on African and Arabian Geoparks - Aspiring Geoparks in Africa and Arab World. El Jadida, Morocco, p 53.
  5. Bouchra Z, Jaber A (2023). Safi à l’aune de l’écriture coloniale: représentations littéraires d'une ville côtière. Entre Histoire, idéologie et exotisme. Repères Littéraires, Langagiers et Artistiques. 3(3): 44–58. https://doi.org/10.34874/PRSM.relilart-vol3iss3.46163
  6. Carcavilla L, Martínez JL, Valsero JD (2007). Patrimonio Geológico y Geodiversidad: Investigación, Conservación, Gestión y Relación con los Espacios Naturales Protegidos (Vol.7). Instituto Geológico y Minero de España: Madrid, Spain.
  7. El Hamidy M, Errami E, & Elkaichi A (2024a). An overview of scientific research on geoheritage in Morocco. Proceedings of the Geologist’s Association. 135: 162–180. https:// doi. org/ 10. 1016/j. pgeola. 2024. 01. 002
  8. El Hamidy M, Errami E, El Kabouri J, Naim M, Assouka A, Ait Ben Youssef A, El Bchari F (2024b). Jbel Irhoud geosite (Youssoufia province, Marrakech-Safi region, Morocco), the cradle of humanity: evaluation and valorisation of the geological heritage for geo-education and geotourism purposes. Geoheritage. 16: 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-00927-z
  9. El Hamidy M, Errami E, Orion N (2024c). Proposed geo-educational activities at the Sidi Bouzid geosite, Safi Province, Marrakech-Safi region, Morocco. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks, 12(2), 209-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2024.03.003
  10. El Hamidy M, Errami E, Elkaichi A (2024d). Current Trends and Future Directions for Geoheritage Assessment Methodology in Morocco. Geoconservation Research (Geoconserv. Res.), 7(1), 89-111. https://doi.org/10.57647/j.gcr.2024.0701.06
  11. Errami E, Sallam E.S, El-Ekhfifi S.S, Kamh S.Z, Muftah A.M, Ismail-Lattrache K.B, El Hamidy M, El Kabouri J, El Kaichi A, Chatir A, Bendaoud A (2024). Geoheritage, Geotourism, and Geoparks in North Africa: Current State. In The Geology of North Africa (pp. 631-660). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48299-1_21
  12. Fassoulas C, Mouriki D, Dimitriou-Nikolakis P, Iliopoulos G (2012). Quantitative assessment of geotopes as an effective tool for geoheritage management. Geoheritage. 4: 177–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0046-9
  13. Ghani M, Raynolds R, Ullah R, Mohibullah M, Kakar MI (2022). Museum of Earth Sciences of the Geological Survey of Pakistan (MESGSP): a Potential Geotourism Attraction. Geoheritage. 14: 106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-022-00741-5
  14. Guerraoui F, Zamama M, Ibnoussina M (2009). Comportement thermique de la poterie et de la ceramique de Safi-Maroc. Physical Chemistry News. 49: 114–120.
  15. Grandgirard V (1995). Méthode pour la réalisation d’un inventaire de géotopes géomorphologiques, UKPIK, Cahiers de l’Institut de Géographie de l’Université de Fribourg. 10: 121–137.
  16. Gray M, Gordan EJ, Brown JE (2013). Geodiversity and the ecosystem approach: the contribution of geoscience in delivering integrated environmental management. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association. 124: 659–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2013.01.003
  17. Herrera-Franco G, Erazo K, Mora-Frank C, Carrión-Mero P, Berrezueta E (2021). Evaluation of a Paleontological Museum as Geosite and Base for Geotourism. A Case Study. Heritage. 4: 1208–1227. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage4030067
  18. ICOM (2022). L’ICOM approuve une nouvelle définition des musées. Available from: https://icom.museum/fr/news/licom-approuve-une-nouvelle-definition-de-musee/
  19. Macovei M (2023). Museum activity promoting geotourism and geosite protection. Muzeul Olteniei Craiova. Oltenia. Studii şi Comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. 39: 277–282.
  20. Nieto LM (2001). Geodiversidad: Propuesta de una definición integradora. Boletín Geológico Min. 112: 3–112. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:130500979
  21. Newsome D, Dowling R (2010). Setting an agenda for geotourism. In Newsome D, Dowling RK (Eds), Geotourism: The Tourism of Geology and Landscape (pp. 1–12). http://dx.doi.org/10.23912/978-1-906884-09-3-1056
  22. Panizza M (2001) Geomorphosites: concepts, methods and examples of geomorphological survey. China Science Bulletin. 46: 4–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187227
  23. Pereira P, Pereira D, Alves MIC (2007). Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geographica Helvetica. 62: 159–168. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-62-159-2007
  24. Pereira P, Pereira D (2010). Methodological guidelines for géomorphosite assessment. Géomorphologie.16: 215–222. https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.7942
  25. Prachita A, Prashant MT, Harshita B, Priya A, Vivesh VK (2023). A survey of the anticipated role of the Indian Museum of Earth (TIME) to foster public awareness towards the preservation of palaeontological relics. Geoheritage. 15: 109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00877-y
  26. Pralong JP (2005). A method for assessing the tourist potential and use of geomorphological sites. Géomorphologie. 3: 189–196. https://doi.org/10.4000/geomorphologie.350
  27. Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007). A method for assessing ‘scientific’ and ‘additional values’ of geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica. 62: 148–158. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-62-148-2007
  28. Reynard E, Perret A, Bussard J, Grangier L, &Martin S (2016). Integrated approach for the inventory and management of geomorphological heritage at the regional scale. Geoheritage. 8: 43-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-015-0153-0
  29. Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health. 18(2): 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211
  30. Touri A (2022). Archéologie et sciences du patrimoine. Recherche, formation et gestion: Les étapes d’un parcours. Hespéris-Tamuda. 57(2): 443–479.
  31. Turner-Carrión M, Carrión-Mero P, Turner-Salamea I, Morante-Carballo F, Aguilaraguilar M, Zambrano-Ruiz K, Berrezueta E (2021). A mineralogical museum as a geotourism attraction: a case study. Minerals. 11: 582. https://doi.org/10.3390/min11060582
  32. Yaseen M, Ghani M, Anjum MN, Sajid M, Jan IU, Mehmood M, Ullah E, Muzaffir W (2019). A novel approach to evaluate, highlight, and conserve the geologically significant geoheritage sites from the Peshawar Basin, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan: insights into their geoscientific, educational, and social importance. Geoheritage. 11: 1461–1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-019-00390-1
  33. Wright E, Fraser S (2020). Safi ceramics: Designing future heritage. The Journal of Modern Craft. 13(1): 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/17496772.2020.1735133