10.57647/j.gcr.2024.0701.04

Analysis of Geosites and Proposal for Expansion: Journey towards UNESCO Status for Călimani National Park

  1. Alexandru Ioan Cuza, University of Iași, Faculty of Geography and Geology, Department of Geography, Iași, Romania
Analysis of Geosites and Proposal for Expansion: Journey towards UNESCO Status for Călimani National Park
Categories

Received: 2023-12-10

Revised: 2024-02-07

Accepted: 2024-04-30

Published 2024-09-23

How to Cite

Valentina Isopescu, V. (2024). Analysis of Geosites and Proposal for Expansion: Journey towards UNESCO Status for Călimani National Park. Geoconservation Research, 7(1), 54-68. https://doi.org/10.57647/j.gcr.2024.0701.04

PDF views: 8

HTML Full Text views: 0

Abstract

The exploration and identification of new geosites in the Călimani Mountains region heralds a significant opportunity to establish Romania's first UNESCO volcanic geopark. This ambitious initiative aims to meticulously evaluate both natural and anthropogenic geosites across the area, highlighting their scientific, educational, and touristic significance, as well as their deep connections to the region's rich history and tradition. Utilizing an adaptation of the geosite analysis framework initially developed by Pralong, researchers in the country have tailored the methodology to better suit the Carpathian region. This study provides a detailed assessment of the criteria applied to the geosites in the Călimani Mountains, emphasizing their essential roles and underlining the need for their conservation through their integration into the Călimani National Park and the expansion of its boundaries. Through the quantitative and qualitative approach of this project, the goal is not only to protect and preserve these valuable geosites but also to promote them as sustainable and educational tourist resources.

 

Keywords

  • Călimani National Park,
  • Conservation,
  • Geosites,
  • Legends,
  • Romania,
  • Volcanic Geopark
  • ...More
    Less

References

  1. Amiri M, Nohegar A, Bouzari S (2018). Potential Assessment of Geomorphological Landforms of the Mountainous Highland Region, Haraz Watershed, Mazandaran, Iran, Using the Pralong Method. Pollution. 4: 381–394. https://doi.org/10.22059/poll.2018.240018.302
  2. Barbălată (Alb) L, Comănescu L (2021). Environmental Sustainability and the Inclusion of Geomorphosites in Tourist Activity - Case Study: The Baiului Mountains, Romania. Sustainability. 13: 8094. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13148094.
  3. Brilha J (2016). Inventory and Quantitative Assessment of Geosites and Geodiversity Sites: A Review. Geoheritage. 8: 119–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-014-0139-3
  4. Brilha J (2018). Geoheritage. In Geoheritage (pp. 69–85). Elsevier. University of Minho, Braga, Portugal. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809531-7.00004-6
  5. Brocx M, Semeniuk V (2007). Geoheritage and Geoconservation – History, Definition, Scope and Scale. Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia. 90: 53–87.
  6. Cayla N, Gauchon C, Hobléa F (2016). From Tourism to Geotourism: A Few Historical Cases from the French Alpine Foreland. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 417: 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP417.10
  7. Cenusa E (2010). Research on the Establishment of Natural Vegetation in Areas Affected by Mining Activities in the Călimani National Park. Ministry of Education, Research, Youth, and Sports; Transylvania University of Brașov.
  8. Chifu T (2006). The Limit Spruce Forest (Cembreto-Piceetum abietis) in the Călimani Mountains. Annals of the University "Al. I. Cuza" from Iași, Geography Series.
  9. Chiriță V, Lupchian M-M, Matei D (2015). The Vatra Dornei Tourism Development Through Local Entrepreneurship (Romania). GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 8: 206–216. http://gtg.webhost.uoradea.ro/
  10. Cioanca L-M, Bâca I (2017). Geosites with Cultural-Historical Significance for the Communities in the Bârgău Valley. Case study: The Monument of the Heroes from Grujul Mare (1882 m) in the Călimani Mountains. Bârgăuan Yearbook, 7, 2017, Ed. Școala Ardeleană, Cluj-Napoca.
  11. Cocean G (2011). The Relationship Between Relief and Tourism in the Trascău Mountains. Facultatea de Geografie pp. 1–34) Cluj.
  12. Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2011). Evaluation of Geomorphosites in Vistea Valley (Fagaras Mountains-Carpathians, Romania). International Journal of Physical Sciences, 6: 1161–1168.
  13. Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2012). The Evaluation of Geomorphosites from the Ponoare Protected Area, Forum Geografic. 11: 54–61.
  14. Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Dobre R (2013). The Geotouristic Map - Between Theory and Practical Use. Case Study - The Central Sector of the Bucegi Mountains (Romania). Geo-Journal of Tourism and Geosites. 11: 16–23.
  15. Comănescu L, Nedelea A, Stănoiu G (2019). Geomorphosites and Geotourism in Bucharest City Center (Romania). Quaestiones Geographicae. 36: 51–61. Doi: 10.1515/quageo-2017-0029;
  16. Danila EL (2007). Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Călimani National Park; University “Stefan cel Mare” Suceava.
  17. Dincă I (2004). Water and Landscapes in the Călimani Mountains. University of Oradea Publishing House, Oradea.
  18. Divine Punishments and Inscriptions of Thousands of Years. The Legends of the Călimani Mountains." (2019, January 14). eMunte.ro. https://www.emunte.ro/pedepse-divine-si-inscriptii-de-mii-de-ani-legendele-muntilor-Călimani/
  19. Dowling RK, Newsome D (Eds.). (2006). Geotourism. Elsevier.
  20. Dumitraș DG, Grigore D, Perșa D, Abioui M (2019). Geosite of the Month 'Canaralele din Portul Hârșova'-The Paleontological Importance of the Most Complete Oxfordian Geosite in Central Dobrogea, Romania. Geoconservation Research, 2: 40–44. 10.30486/gcr.2019.1878598.1014;
  21. Erikstad L (2013). Geoheritage and Geodiversity Management – the Questions for Tomorrow. Proceedings of the Geologists’ Association, 124: 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2012.07.003
  22. Errami E, Brocx M, Semeniuk V (Eds.). (2015). From Geoheritage to Geoparks: Case Studies from Africa and Beyond. Springer International Publishing.
  23. Fauzi NSM, Misni A (2016). Geoheritage Conservation: Indicators Affecting the Condition and Sustainability of Geopark – A Conceptual Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 222: 676–684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.224
  24. Florea L (2017). The Inventory of Fish from the National Park Călimani: Pressures, Threats, and Management Directions. Current Trends in Natural Sciences, 6: 174–183.
  25. Gavril IG, Anghel T. (n.d.). Geomorphosites inventory in the Măcin Mountains (south-eastern Romania). Babeş-Bolyai University, Faculty of Geography, Cluj Napoca.
  26. Gordon J (2018). Geoheritage, Geotourism and the Cultural Landscape: Enhancing the Visitor Experience and Promoting Geoconservation. Geosciences. 8: 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040136
  27. Gordon JE, Crofts R, Gray M, Tormey D (2021). Including geoconservation in the management of protected and conserved areas matters for all of nature and people. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. 9: 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2021.05.003
  28. Gray M, Crofts R (2022). The potential role of the geosciences in contributing to the UN’s sustainable development goals. Parks Stewardship Forum 38(1). https://doi.org/10.5070/P538156120
  29. Grecu F, Iosif D (2014). La Notion du Géosite et son Pertinence dans une Étude sur la Région des Gorges du Danube en Roumanie, Analele Universităţii Bucureşti: Seria Geografie 63: 178–184.
  30. Introduction to the Fascinating World of the Romanian Carpathians - Part VII: The Volcanic Triad - the Călimani, Gurghiu, Harghita Massifs." (March 9, 2022). "Traveler on the Paths of the Carpathians." Retrieved from: https://calatorpepotecilecarpatilor.blog/introducere/introducere-in-lumea-fascinanta-a-carpatilor-romaniei-partea-a-vii-a-triada-vulcanica-masivele-Călimani-gurghiu-harghita/
  31. Macovei M, Danciu I, Sebe-Rădoi OG, Grigore D, Crușoveanu S. (2020) Preliminary Evaluation of the Abator Quarry - Hârșova (Romania) - A proposal for a New Geosite. Muzeul Olteniei, Craiova. Oltenia. Studii şi Comunicări. Ştiinţele Naturii. 36: 21–28.
  32. Ministry of the Environment (2016). Integrated Management Plan for the Natura 2000 Site ROSCI0051 Cuşma.
  33. Naum T, Butnaru E (1988). Monograph of the Căliman Mountains. Sport and Tourism Publishing House, Dolj.
  34. Necula N, Mihai N, Vasiliniuc I (2022). Geosites, Geomorphosites and Geodiversity in Putna Catchment, Vrancea, Romania. EGU Conference Abstracts, EGU22-11182.
  35. Ovreiu AB, Bărsoianu IA, Comănescu L, Nedelea A (2019). Capitalizing of the geotourism potential and its impact on relief. Case study: Cozia massif, Romania. Geo Journal of Tourism and Geosites. 24: 212–236.
  36. Pasquaré Mariotto F, Drymoni K, Bonali FL, Tibaldi A, Corti N, Oppizzi P (2023). Geosite Assessment and Communication: A Review. Resources. 12: 29. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources12020029
  37. Pralong J-P (2005). A Method for Assessing Tourist Potential and Use of Geomorphological Sites. Géomorphologie Relief Processus Environnement. 11: 189–196.
  38. Rădulescu C, Grecu F (2018). L'Enquête Statistique sur la Relation entre Valeur Scientifique et la Valeur Globale des Géosites du Plateau d'Oltina, Cinq Continents. 8: 118–132.
  39. Reynard E, Brilha J (2018). Geoheritage: a multidisciplinary and applied research topic. In Geoheritage (pp. 3-9). Elsevier, Amsterdam.
  40. Reynard E, Fontana G, Kozlik L, Scapozza C (2007). A Method for Assessing Scientific and Additional Values of Geomorphosites. Geographica Helvetica. 62: 148–158. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-62-148-2007
  41. Romsilva (2022). Management Plan of Călimani National Park, the Site of Community Importance ROSCI0019 Călimani-Gurghiu (the Part Overlapping with Călimani National Park), the Special Protection Area ROSPA0133 Munții Călimani, and the Areas of National Interest that Overlap with It.
  42. Rus O (2018). Geomorphosites in the Harghita Mountains. Babeș-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Faculty of Geography.
  43. Seghedi I, Szakács A (1997). The Călimani-Gurghiu-Harghita (CGH) Volcanic Chain. In Field Trip Guide of 4th National Symposium on Mineralogy, 3-8 October 1997, Iaşi (pp. 14-19). Romanian Journal of Mineralogy. 78(Suppl. 2).
  44. Seghedi I, Szakacs A, Pèkskay Z, Raul R, Mason D (2005). Eruptive Stages and Age of Magmatic Processes in the Călimani Volcanic Structure. Geologica Carpathica. 56: 67–75.
  45. Selmi L, Coratza P, Gauci R, Soldati M (2019). Geoheritage as a Tool for Environmental Management: A Case Study in Northern Malta (central Mediterranean Sea). MDPI Journal. 8: 168. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources8040168
  46. Stoica D-L (2007). Research on Physical Geography on the Northern Slope of the Călimani Massif. Terra Nostra, Iași.
  47. Szakács A, Chiriță V (2017). Protected Natural Values of Geoheritage Interest in the Călimani National Park, Eastern Carpathians, Romania. Geoheritage. 9: 421–434. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-0230-7
  48. The Mysteries of the Megaliths or the Path of the '12 Apostles' in the Călimani Mountains. (2018, November 28). Romania Cultural Magazine. Retrieved from https://culturaromana.ro/misterele-megalitilor-sau-poteca-celor-12-apostoli-din-muntii-Călimani/
  49. Toma CB (2012). Geomorphosites on Salt in the Transylvanian Depression and Their Touristic Valorization [Doctoral dissertation, Babeș-Bolyai University, Faculty of Geography]. Cluj-Napoca.
  50. Warowna J, Zgłobicki W, Kołodyńska-Gawrysiak R, Gajek G, Gawrysiak L, Telecka M (2016). Geotourist values of loess geoheritage within the planned Geopark Małopolska Vistula River Gap, E Poland. Quaternary International. 399: 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.06.064
  51. Welcome2Romania. (2011, October 6). Călimani National Park - The Border between Transylvania, Bukovina, and Moldova. Retrieved October 6, 2011, from https://welcome2romania.wordpress.com/2011/10/06/parcul-national-calimani-granita-intre-ardeal-bucovina-si-moldova-national-park-calimani/