Geoconservation Research
Volcanism & Geoconservation
2023, Volume 6 / Issue 1 / pages(139-160)
Original Article
Ahmet Serdar Aytaç1, Tuncer Demir2, *
1Harran University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Geography Department Osmanbey Campus, Sanlıurfa/
Türkiye
2Akdeniz University Faculty of Letters Geography department, Konyaaltı, Antalya/ Türkiye
Tuncer Demir Akdeniz University Faculty of Let-
ters Geography, Turkey ORCID: 0000-0003-2740-7268
Abstract
The Kula-Salihli UNESCO Global Geopark includes evidence of geological his- tory spanning 600 million years, from Palaeozoic metamorphic rocks to late pre- historic volcanic eruptions. It can function as a field laboratory for geosciences, demonstrating a variety of graben and fault structures and fluvial, volcanic, and karstic landscapes, in addition to rocks from various geological eras, evidence of fluvial processes, and topographic inversions caused by differential erosion. The topography and landscape elements also exhibit the qualities of a natural monument. The majority of the most recent basaltic lava eruptions, linked to the development of scoria cones, took place in the western Anatolian Kula-Salihli UNESCO Geopark during the Pleistocene and Holocene epochs. In this unique volcanic province, there is also much earlier volcanism, such as a few older la- vas that overlie mesa-style uplands, conserving underneath them sediments that are loosely bound but otherwise would have been lost to erosion. Because of its rich and diverse geoheritage value, the geopark is emerging as a location for ac- ademic studies, teaching, and investigation of natural events. This study aims to introduce the volcanism-related geosites of the Kula Salihli UNESCO Global Geopark. In this context, we present the results of geomorphological research that we have been conducting in the region with an international team for many years, as well as field observations and relevant literature.
Keywords:Geosite, Geoheritage, Volcanic Landforms, Kula–Salihli Geopark, Anatolia, Türkiye
Article information |
Received:2023-04-18 Accepted:2023-06-17 First Publish Date:2023-06-24 DOI:10.30486/GCR.2023.1982314.1128 How to cite: Aytaç AS & Demir T (2023). Volcanic monument of Western Anatolia: Kula-Salihli UNESCO Global Geopark. Geoconservation Research. 6(2): 139-160. doi: 10.30486/gcr.2023.1982314.1128 Geoconservation Research e-ISSN: 2588-7343 p-ISSN: 2645-4661 © Author(s) 2023, this article is published with open access at https://gcr.isfahan.iau.ir/
|
Geoparks are conservation areas that aim to protect the geological, natural and cultural heritage while supporting sustainable economic and cultural de- velopment of the society. This means that geoparks are the only locations where ordinary people can participate in both economic activity and natural protection processes at the same time. Geoparks are significant instruments of growth and nature protection in the twenty-first century.
Kula-Salihli Geopark is the only UNESCO reg- istered Global geopark of Türkiye and Turkish speaking states in Middle Asia (Aytaç and Demir 2019a). The geopark consists of two main geo- graphical sections, The Kula Volcanic Area and the Gediz Graben. Most geosites connected to volca- noes are located in the Kula area of the geopark and in areas of Salihli (Adala) that are close to Kula. The sites formed from volcanism in the Geopark area are mainly lava flows, volcanic cones, parasite cones, maars and base surge structures, dykes, vol- canic lava caves and contact metamorphism zones formed through volcanism. Kula volcanic region is one of the youngest and most popular volcanic fields of Türkiye. In this area, volcanism initiated approximately 1.7 Ma and continued until prehis- toric times. During the entire Pleistocene, volca- nism took place in three separate phases and lava flows emerging from cones buried most of the pa- leotopography so that the evidence of older rocks has been preserved extensively. The Kula Volcanic Region, which hosts the majority of the geosites within the Geopark area is an area of international geological significance.
Since ancient times, the Kula Volcanic area has been a popular destination. Strabo (63 BC–24 AD), the renowned Greek geographer, compared the Italian volcanics to Kula. He noted that the vol- canic field of Kula is comparable to areas where volcanoes once existed in Italy. As a result, Kula Volcanic Province appears to be the first location
in history where the concept of an “extinct volca- no” was documented. Due to the coal-black lava, Kula was referred to by Strabo as “Katakekau- mene” (Burnt-Country) in his magnificent book “Geographica” (Gümüş 2014). In ancient times, this region was considered to be one of the entry points to the underworld.
The importance of geology in addition to Kula’s unique cultural heritage was described in detail by the renowned French historian Charles Texier (1862). Scientific research on the Kula volcanoes region began around the beginning of the nine- teenth century and has continued to the present. Hamilton and Strickland (1841) and Philippson (1913) conducted studies on the geology and geo- morphology of the Kula volcanic field and stressed the importance of this volcanic region (e.g., Jones 1954). The geochemistry of the lava flows in the area was first studied later that century, when Washington (1894, 1900) named the lava at Kula “Kulaite.” According to Canet and Jaoul (1946), the volcanic cones are approximately situated on a pair of straight lines whose strikes are sub-parallel to the Gediz Graben margin in the area. Later re- searchers Erinç (1970) and Ozaner (1992) focused on the geomorphology while Ercan (1981) and Bunbury (1992) focused on the petrology and tec- tonic of the Kula volcanites. Up to now more than five PhDs and a MSc thesis have been submitted on Kula volcanism, and there are more than 100 scientific papers.
Kula-Salihli Geopark, where geodiversity is very high, geological heritage elements can be classified into five groups: stratigraphic, structural, volcanic landforms, landform, and geoarchaeological. The volcanic geosites are probably the most important, and here we describe the volcanic richness of the Kula- Salihli Geopark and emphasize the region’s significance in terms of geotourism, geoprotection, and sustainable development.
The Kula-Salihli UNESCO Geopark, located in the western Turkish province of Manisa, spans the northern section of the Gediz graben over the administrative-territorial boundaries of the Kula and Salihli municipalities (Fig. 1). The 2320 km2
geopark, which is geographically divided into the Gediz graben and the Kula Volcanic Province, includes 73 unique geosites. The Kula Volcanic Province is located on the northern uplifted shoul- der (Horst block) of the graben (Fig. 2).
In this study, topographic maps of 1/100000 and 1/25000 scales, geological maps at 1/100000 scale from the MTA General Directorate, SRTM DEM data, and literature on the study area and its sur- rounds were all used. The results of our geologi- cal-geomorphological carried out in the area with an international research team for many years, as well as the relevant literature, have been used to determine the geosites associated with volcanism, which are practically natural monuments in the area.
Protection of geoheritage in the Kula region started with the protection of the Sandal Divlit and Kula Divlit volcanic cones and the lava flows arising from them. These volcanic geosites are under strict protection, within the framework of the legislation numbered 2863 and dated 23.07.1983, of the Re- public of Türkiye Ministry of Culture and Tourism, concerning the protection of natural and cultural sites. These areas, which were taken under protec- tion long before the geopark was established, also host the most important geosites of the geopark.
The effort to designate the Kula region as a geopark has a ten-year history, beginning with a European Union (EU) project of the 2007–2008 program (Aytaç and Demir 2019a). The first official pro- posal to the Global Geoparks Network (GGN) was submitted in November 2012 after several years of work to designate the region as a geopark un- der UNESCO requirements. As a result, in March 2013, the Kula Volcanic Geopark became Turki- ye’s first candidate for a Global Geopark.
In June 2013, experts affiliated with the Global Geoparks Network reviewed the geopark and ap- proved it as Turkiye’s first geopark, which was officially recognized by the network in Septem- ber 2013. According to a 2017 revalidation, Kula
Geopark could not fulfill several of the UNESCO requirements. As a result, the geopark management body was restructured, and a modernized structure was established in accordance with UNESCO re- quirements (Aytaç and Demir 2019b). In this cir- cumstance, the territories of the geopark and all its geosites were reevaluated; the territory of the geopark expanded from 302 km2 to 2321 km2; its name was changed to Kula-Salihli Geopark, and a comprehensive extension proposal was submit- ted to UNESCO. The geopark thus received new approval in July 2019 and was reregistered with UNESCO in 2020.
Having been accepted as a Global Geopark in 2013, the Kula Geopark had to adopt the UNES- CO strategy on the construction and maintenance of Global Geoparks. In 2018, Kula Geopark was expanded to establish the Kula-Salihli Geopark to preserve the long-term sustainability of the entire region, improve its management, and preserve the Salihli District’s unique geological, historical, and culturally significant areas.
To comply with European Geoparks Network and UNESCO Global Geopark regulations, the three muicipalities (Manisa Metropolitan Municipality and the municipalities of Kula and Salihli) estab- lished a partially autonomous organization in 2016 to operate the Kula-Salihli Geopark. As a result, the Geopark Municipalities Union was recognized as a legislative body of the Republic of Türkiye. The geopark administrative office always makes decisions on the geopark, which are then approved by the Geopark Municipalities Union Council fol- lowing consideration of recommendations from a scientific committee and, where necessary, consul- tation with other stakeholders (Aytaç et al. 2022). Funding of Kula Salihli Geopark (sponsorship) is made by the Union of Municipalities of the Geopark. The geopark has its own management plan and the development of the Geopark takes place within the framework of the action plan in
the management plan. The Geopark Municipali- ties Union is an officially recognized organization in the Republic of Türkiye. As a result, decisions about the geopark are governed by approved regu- lations and laws.
General Geology of the Kula-Salihli Geopark The Kula-Salihli Geopark lies on the eastern sec- tion of Aegean Extensional Province, where the Af- rican plate subducts beneath its southern boundary and forces the continental crust in this area to ex- tend. This subduction appears to be responsible for pulling a block of continental crust southwestward, which creates the minor Turkish plate (e.g., Meijer and Wortel 1997). The geopark area, bordered to the north and south by the WNW-trending Simav and Alaşehir grabens respectively (Seyitoğlu 1997; Bozkurt and Sözbilir 2004), is mainly located on a block of crystalline rocks of the Menderes Massif (e.g., Bozkurt 2001; Bozkurt & Oberhänsli 2001; Erdoğan & Güngör 2004), which is delimited by a southward-tilted footwall block of the Simav Gra- ben or a southward-tilted hanging-wall block of the Alaşehir graben (Koralay et al. 2004; Seyitoğlu et al. 1997, 2004). In this province, crustal thick- ening brought about by earlier orogenic contrac- tion has resulted in the extension of the continental lithosphere in a N–S orientation (Ercan et al. 1983; Bozkurt and Sözbilir 2004; Ersoy et al. 2010). The extension, which lasted from the late Oligocene to the Early Miocene, was triggered by dextral slide on the North Anatolian Fault System and collision of the African Plate below the southern margin (limit) of Anatolian Plate across the Aegean-Cy- prean subduction zone (Ersoy et al. 2010).
Kula Volcanic Region, which also comprises the geopark’s eastern side, stands in the southern half of the the Neogene Selendi Basin, which has been filled with thick Miocene Basin fill sediments. Much of the sediment in this basin is unlithified and erodes easily, resulting in a deeply incised badland landscape. A series of Quaternary basalt
flows from nearly a hundred small volcanic necks have locally flowed on this incised topography, capping and thus conserving the underlying Mio- cene age fluvial deposits, or ‘fossilising’ them. The Salihli portion of the geopark, on the other hand, is located on the Gediz Graben, an E–W-trending structure which is one of western Türkiye’s most notable structural components. This graben is an active asymmetric graben, with active normal faults mostly on the southern margin (Fig. 3).
The Kula-Salihli Geopark hosts important geolog- ical records encompassing more than 600 million years of earth history, from Palaeozoic metamor- phic rocks to late prehistoric volcanic activity. It functions like an outdoor laboratory for the earth and natural science researchers, with a variety of fault and graben forms, various forms of fluvial, karstic, and volcanic landforms, rocks spanning different geological eras, indications of fluvial ero- sional and depositional processes, and topographic inversions owing to differential erosion. A tangible record of history of the earth is presented here, dis- closing proof of significant geological and geomor- phological evolutionary processes. The geopark is developing as an area for scientific research, teach- ing, and the exploration of natural events because of its geoheritage significance, which is to be of global scientific and aesthetic relevance.
The major geosites within the Geopark can be classified into three categories: the first category reflects the geological evolution of the region, in- cluding the various volcanic landforms and struc- tures (21), stratigraphic units (2), faults, joints (4); the second category includes regional geomorpho- logical features and processes, and hydrological geoheritage (fluvial 5 and karstic landforms 2, erosion processes 4, and others 15); and the third category represents the geoarcheological sites (5), hosting evidence of the geological and human history of the area. In addition, the geopark area
is very rich in terms of its historical and cultural heritage as this area has been an important area of human activities since prehistoric times. This is the reason why there are 15 archaeological, historical and cultural sites within the geopark.
The geopark is a result of the impressive volcanic topography in the Kula region, which has been ac- tive since the early Pleistocene and extends to the Holocene for the most recent volcanic eruptions (2.7 ka) (van Gorp et al. 2013). There is also an excellent sedimentary (early Pleistocene river-ter- race deposits) and geomorphological record of landscape and drainage evolution in addition to the Quaternary volcanism. Much of this record has barely remained due to the emplacement of long-lasting lavas and tuffs that have preserved the softer unconsolidated river sediments from ero- sion.
The Kula-Salihli Geopark provides an excellent opportunity for a diverse range of stakeholders in earth sciences to interact. The geopark is situated in one of the world’s most active tectonically ex- panding zones. This region is a component of the “Aegean Extensional Region,” an area of spread- ing extension that includes parts of Macedonia, Bulgaria, Greece, and Albania. As a result, the area is an excellent place for earth scientists to inves- tigate global and regional tectonics. This area’s geology also includes the best and most complete records of environmental changes related to global climate change and also regional tectonism. Lavas emanating from various cones dispersed through- out vast areas of the Kula volcanic province, form large lava plateaux covered by lavas. These lava plateaux stabilize the pre-existing landscape by preventing erosion. Thus, studying geological stra- ta and formations underneath the lava-covered pla-
teaux that contain evidence of paleoenvironmen- tal and paleoclimate conditions will aid scientists in determining the conditions under which they formed. Indications of Quaternary environmental changes connected to both human impact and nat- ural processes can be seen in the geology of the geopark. Numerous badlands in the region are ev- idence of overgrazing in the recent past, connect- ing landscape change to modern civilization and culture.
The Kula Volcanic Region is located in the south- ern part of the Neogene Selendi Basin. The volca- nic field is roughly 15 km north to south and 40 km east to west. The volcanic rocks in the area are constituted of tephra and lavas ejected by 83 cinder cones (Richardson-Bunbury 1996). Most of the lava flows constitute alkali olivine basalt, phonotephrite, and basanite-classified lava flows (Güleç 1991). Tephra, tuffs, and cinder cones can also be observed. The volcanism which began around Kula 1.7 Ma generates mafic basalts that are commonly connected with active rifting (Er- can 1993; Ercan et al. 1983; Richardson-Bunbury 1996).
These volcanic activities and associated basalt flows are categorized into four groups, β1–β4, in ascending order of relative age, as implied by weathering and erosion extents (Canet and Jaoul 1946). Unfortunately, no objective criteria can be used to resolve the β1 category (Richardson-Bun- bury 1992; Richardson-Bunbury 1996). Hence, three categories are left. The β2 basalts, commonly referred to as the “Burgaz volcanics” and are un- doubtedly the oldest, cap the highest portions of the current fluvial terrain, approximately 150–200 m above the current level of the Gediz River. Their estimated total volume is 0.5 km3 (Bunbury et al. 2001). They are frequently seen to cover river deposits at this relative level, suggesting that the contemporary Gediz gorge had not yet started to
be carved when they erupted. The β3 basalts, also termed the “Elekçitepe volcanics,” which erupted after the commencement of this stage of incision and are now somewhat weathered, stand out above the current river level in the Gediz valley. The β4 basalts, also known as the “Divlit tepe volcanics,” are found to be fresher in the field and, where trapped by tributaries of the Gediz, reach the cur- rent gorge floor. The combined volume of the β3 and β4 basalts is 2 km3 with most of this amount belonging to the β3 group (Bunbury et al. 2001) (Fig.3).
Geographically, each stage of volcanism is linked to an area with various eruption centers. Those in the far north, presently on or near basaltic plateaux, were the earliest, with strongly weathered volcanic cones or volcanic necks. The middle Pleistocene eruption centers were located even farther south, and their flows took place at lower altitudinal lev- els. Eventually, most of the latest eruption vol- canoes are located yet further south, close to the Alaşehir (Gediz) graben, and are supported by the existence of large cones and lava flows with quite fresh, uneven surfaces on which it is difficult to walk. Most of these lava flow patterns make their way to the contemporary Gediz River north of Kula Town.
Some fossilized human footprints were found in 1970 around the Demirköprü Reservoir, adjoining to a neck (β4) yielded an age of 65 ± 7 ka, 49 ka from hornblende crystals scratched from the tephra underlying the footprint, and 26 ± 5 ka from ba- saltic scoria covering the footprint (e.g., Ozansoy 1969; Barnaby 1975; Göksu 1978). The context, nevertheless, implies that the tuff fall, imprinting of the footprints, and burial took place in rapid succession during the same eruption phase, rather than over tens of thousands of years. The age of the related eruption was assessed by Erinç (1970) to be 10 ka, although Tekkaya (1976) reported that the age of these footprints is approximately 12 ka.
The sites formed by volcanism in the Geopark area include lava flows, volcanic cones, parasite cones, Maar and base surge structures, dykes, volcanic lava caves, basaltic columns and contact metamor- phism zones formed through volcanism.
Volcanic Cones: Un-eroded volcanic cones belong to the last stage of volcanic activity in Kula. Their geologically young age means that the morpholog- ical structures of the cones are very well preserved. Volcanic cones and structures which belong to dif-
ferent eruptive periods are found next to each other in the Kula area which reveals a perfect compari- son for volcanic evolution and related geodynamic processes at the Sandal Divlit, Küçük Divlit and Bağtepe Divlit cinder cones (Figs. 4–5).
Volcanic cones in the geopark consist of Sandal Divlit, Kula Divlit, Küçük Divlit, Kaplan Divlit, Çakallar cinder cone, Saraçlar Horseshoe cones, the most important of which are the Sandal Divlit, Kula Divlit and Cinder cones.
Spatter Cones and Spatter Ramparts: It is possible to observe several spatter cones or lava flow forms in the Kula Volcanic Province. Spatter cones are small, steep slopes or mounds formed by spatter or welded lava pieces around the fountain of lava erupting from the cone’s center and are typically around three and five meters high. They are main- ly, mafic, highly fluid lavas, similar to those that formed the Hawaiian Islands. When molten lava spatter is ejected into the air by a lava fountain, and it may not have enough time to cool completely before falling to the ground. In the case of a linear fissure, lava fountaining would then form broad spatter berms, known as spatter ramparts, on both sides of the fissure. Spatter cones are circular and cone-shaped features, whereas spatter ramparts are linear wall-like features (Figs. 6–8).
Lava Flows: Lava flows are one of the most promi- nent morphologies of the Kula volcanic area. There are five different lava flows in the area, the Kula Divlit Lava Flow, Sandal Divlit Lava Flow, Kaplan
Divlit Lava Flow, Elekçitepe and Hacıhasan lava flow platform, and the Burgaz Lava Plate (Figs. 6–7).
Lava Caves: There are many lava caves and lava tubes both inside the volcanic cone crater and around their lava flows. Some of these caves have been modified and used by people, thus having archaeological significance. On the other hand, some of them have been used as barns. The most spectacular lava caves and lava tubes are found on the basaltic canyon walls of the Dereköy Canyon (Gümüş 2014). Plenty of lava caves and lava tubes have been found within lava flows in the Kula, Sandal and Kaplan lava flow (Figs. 8–9).
Maars: Five maars have been diagnosed in the Kula volcanic area, of which Çukurada is the most prominent. The Çukurada Maar measures 110 m in depth and 1000 m in diameter. Çukurada and four others belong to the second stage of volcanism while Divlittepe Maar belongs to the last stage. Çukurada Maar was formed due to a violent ex-
plosion while other maars are “tuff ring” style. Be- cause of these explosive activities phreatomagmat- ic base surge structures are common in the vicinity (Gümüş 2014) (Figs. 7–10).
Base Surge Structures: Base surge bedforms have
been observed around maars in Kula related to the second stage volcanism between Saraçlar and San- dal craters. Base surge deposits are rare volcanic deposits of pyroclostastic materials characterized by undulated cross beddings (Ercan and Öztunalı 1982). The base surge deposits were created by
shallow, explosive steam eruptions, which are tur- bulent mixtures of steam, and solid ejecta that orig- inate from the crater and sweep outward with high velocities (Gümüş 2014) (Fig. 11).
Dikes: Spectacular dikes are found in Sarnıç Vil-
lage. One of the most important is the Karayar dike in the Karayar area, where basaltic magma was in- jected into overlying lacustrine sediments. In this area, there is also a very nice volcanic feeder. In the Karayar area, basaltic dikes stand more than 100 m vertically above the land surface because
of their resistance to erosion. Dikes are layers of volcanic rock intrusions that shoulder aside other pre-existing layers or bodies of rock in an existing rock body or a crosscutting fissure, meaning that a dike is always younger than the rocks it crosscuts (Gümüş 2014) (Fig. 12–14).
Columnar Basalts: Columnar basalts can be seen around the Burgaz, Sarnıç and İbrahiağa plateaus. Spectacular columnar basalts are found near the Çakırca and Palankaya Villages where the rapid cooling of the thick lava flow has created charac- teristic basalt columns (Fig. 13).
In Kula Salihli Geopark, there is a significant link between the origins of some geosites and volca- nism. The most important geosites are mentioned below.
Sarnıç contact metamorphism and paleosoil layers: Contact metamorphism created by the cooking of clay minerals within the Quaternary fluvio-lacus- trine sediments by hot lava flow can be witnessed all along the canyons and mesa structures where first (1.1 my) and second (0.3 my) stage lava flow interacted with the fluvio-lacustrine basement. This contact band can be recognized even from far due to its shiny red color (Figs. 12–14).
Burgaz Lava Plateaux and Early Pleistocene Ter- races of the Paleo-Gediz River: The Palaeo-Gediz terraces have been identified beneath the high-lev- el Burgaz and Sarnç plateaux in the Kula volcanic area, both of which are capped by some of the ear- liest basaltic lava flows (Maddy et al. 2012). These lavas originated in three necks and flowed right across the palaeo-Gediz valley floor and into the current river, smothering the pre-basalt landscape and preserving its terraced deposits (Fig. 15). Pa- laeo-Gediz sediments can be found in continuous parts across the Burgaz plateau, as well as in more limited outcrops along the Sarnç and İbrahioağa plateaux. Eleven terraces preserved beneath ba- saltic lava flows on the Burgaz plateau date from
1.67 to 1.245 Ma (MIS 59-37) (Maddy et al. 2017).
These terraces are of worldwide significance be- cause they formed during the early Pleistocene by the combined effects of localized tectonic uplift and obliquity-driven 41,000-year global climatic cycles. These exceptionally well-preserved terrac- es contain evidence of global climatic changes that took place on a worldwide scale and had a pro- found impact on the Mediterranean basin (Maddy et al. 2020).
Çakallar prehistoric fossil human footprints: The Çakallar volcanic region has unique prehistoric hu- man footprints. These footprints were discovered
by coincidence on a thin tuff layer covering the basement metamorphic bedrock during construc- tion of the Demirköprü Dam in 1954–1960. Around 200 footprints were discovered, with approximate- ly sixty of them being moved to the MTA’s Natural History Museum in Ankara (Gümüş 2014; Türe 2018; Aytaç and Demir 2020) (Fig. 16).
Kanlıkaya (Bloody Stone) prehistoric rock paint- ings/ pictograph: The Kanlıkaya is located near the Çakallar volcano. The paintings were drawn in red colors on a gneissic rock boulder known as Kanlıkaya, which translates as “Bloody Stone” (Gümüş 2014; Aytaç and Demir 2020). Because
of the strong evidence from the footprints that people observed a volcanic explosion, this picto- graph (Fig. 17) stands out among other prehistoric art pieces that depict an erupting volcano (Ulusoy et al. 2019).
Geopark’s Kula Section, northeast of the Kula dis- trict. Kula Divlit Volcanic Park has six geosites re- lated to volcanism. This theme park was designed so that visitors can observe lava flows and many types of volcanic cones. A 3-km- long walking path, wooden bridges, and camellias enable pas- sage over fallen lava tunnels (Fig. 18). Kula Divlit Volcanic Park is one of Kula Salihli Geopark’s most popular and visited locations.
Correspondingly, until 2014, approximately 10,000 tourists visited the Kula region annually, but that figure increased to 80,000 in 2018 and 92,000 in 2019. The state-imposed weekend restrictions had
a significant impact on geotourism during the pan- demic. During this time, our geopark and visitor center were partially accessible through guided tours.
Kula Salihli geopark offers a range of activities focusing on the significance of geoheritage, its preservation, and increasing societal awareness. A variety of educational activities and excursions emphasizing the geological features of the geopark are offered for travel companies to introduce Kula Salihli Geopark and especially Kula. Field training programs are organized, and expeditions are made by the geopark management office for people from colleges and universities requiring detailed aca- demic information on the natural and cultural heri- tage of the Geopark. In these activities, Kula Divlit volcanic park attracts special attention. This is all done as part of the management team’s collabora- tive efforts with the Public Education Organiza- tion. Numerous showcase and explanation panels aid in the promotion of the geopark and its particu- lar geosites. Furthermore, various sorts of electron- ic showcases advertise and promote the geopark in
district centers.
These activities have supported the expansion of the local tourism business and increased the communi- ty’s awareness of the importance of geoheritage. When certain conditions are fulfilled, businesses inside the geopark territory, such as restaurants, motels, and gift shops, receive designation as cer- tificated geopark partners. Historical Kula houses that were once owned by the Kula Municipality have been designed into business enterprises that offer amenities such as accommodation or restau- rants to promote tourism in the area. Additional sporting events such as hiking, cycling and mar- athon races have been organized in the Geopark (Fig. 19). All of this has been augmented by book- lets and other articles promoting the geopark.
By developing infrastructure, the Geopark Mu- nicipalities Union intends to encourage the devel- opment and expansion of rural tourism within the geopark area, especially in Kula. The building of a Geopark Visitor Center in the Kula Divlit Volcanic Park began in 2021.
The establishment of the geopark has improved the region’s attractiveness to researchers, and there is currently a notable rise in the number of projects for scientific investigation. Summer vacation pro- grams for children ranging in age from primary to secondary school have been designed to raise awareness of the geological features of the area among children (Fig. 20). These activities include basic training on subjects like climate change, earthquakes, flooding, the importance of fresh- water, and its role in the economy in the schools located in the geopark. As part of the Geopark ed-
ucation plan, a program called ‘Geopark education at school’ was launched in 2021. Within the scope of this program, students have been taught about natural disasters such as forest fires, floods, and earthquakes, which have occurred frequently in recent years and resulted in significant loss of life and property.
Although Kula-Salihli Geopark is the first and only UNESCO geopark in Türkiye, geoprotec- tion has only recently been a phenomenon in this
country (Aytaç and Demir 2019a). In this regard, the geopark serves as the foundation for the pro- motion and development of efficient geoprotec- tion throughout the region. Security officers and geopark security personnel assist with safeguard- ing some geosites while also trying to educate and raise public awareness about conserving cultural and natural resources. Because of their very fresh, diverse and young volcanic forms, the Kula vol- canoes are among the most popular destinations for tourists in the geopark. They have indeed fasci-
nated the scientific community and travelers since antiquity, representing a prominent feature of the landscape in the region. However, before the estab- lishment of the geopark, fresh scoria material from the scoria cones in the volcanic field had either been used by private companies as construction and filling material for road construction works or these areas had been used as storage areas for solid wastes by the municipalities. After the establish- ment of the geopark, some specific and stringent regulations for using the cinder cones came into
effect. Currently, these volcanic landscapes are heavily conserved, and quarrying is allowed only in volcanic cones that are not defined as geosites. The educational activities and rise in tourism have promoted the advantages of these locations in terms of landscape, tourism and ecology.
Kula-Salihli Geopark has a very rich geodiversity and hosts evidence of about 600 Myr of the history of the earth. The geopark works as an open natural laboratory in hosting the best examples of geology, geomorphology and natural sciences features from various geological ages. The most preeminent land- scapes of the geopark are the landforms formed by volcanism, including various forms of lava flows, volcanic cones, craters, maars, basalt columns, volcanic canyons, Paleogediz terraces, badlands topography and fairy chimneys (Hodoos), Gediz graben, and geoarchaeological sites. Volcanic geo- heritage sites represent naturally occurring events that have intrigued frightened, devastated, and “resourced” mankind with nutrient-rich soil along with additional geological advantages in many dif- ferent forms. Volcanism is also of significant pub- lic interest because eruptions occur on human time scales and yet can have devastating and beneficial outcomes. Hence, geoparks with active volcanoes and in places affected by recent volcanism are becoming more common, with increasing appre- ciation of the potential given by such geosites for fostering geotourism in regions related to dynamic volcanism (Joyce 2009; Joyce 2010a; 2010b; Mi- gon and Pijet-Migon 2016; Németh et al. 2017). Despite the absence of active volcanoes in the area, the volcanic landscapes created by ancient volca- nism preserve their originality or appeal, rendering the area an increasingly popular place for tourists. For this reason, Kula Salihli Geopark occupies a very important place as a volcanic monument in western Anatolia.
The authors of this article state that they do not have any known conflicting financial interests or relationships that could appear to have influenced the work stated in this study.
The Kula-Salihli Geopark employees (Ali Karataş, Mesut Kolbüken and Yiğit Karakuzu) and the Geopark Municipalities Union are gratefully ac- knowledged for their contributions and support.
Aytaç AS, Demir, T, Maddy D & Bridgland DR (2022). The Kula–Salihli UNESCO Geopark: Spectacular records of Quaternary volcanism fluvial and landscape evolution and Quaternary environmental change. Proceedings of the Ge- ologists’ Association, https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pgeola.2022.06.008
Aytaç AS, Demir T (2019a). The first and unique UNESCO labeled geopark of the Turkey and Turkic Republics: Kula UNESCO Global Geopark. V International Turkic World Tourism Symposium/13–15 June 2019/Taraz – Kazakh- stan.
Aytaç AS, Demir T (2019b). Recommendation of Three New Geosites that are International- ly Significant in Terms of Geo-Heritage with- in the Territory of the Kula UNESCO Global Geopark. Mediterranean Journal of Human- ities. mjh.akdeniz.edu.tr IX/2 (2019) 125-140 DOI: 10.13114/MJH.2019.480
Aytaç AS & Demir T (2020). Geoheritages of the Salihli (Manisa) district. Chapter in Academic Studies in Social Sciences. Babacan H, Eraslan M, Temizer A (eds) First Ed. Ivpe Pub. Cetinje, Montenegro
Barnaby W (1975). International news ‘picture sto- ry’ Nature. 254: 553.
Bozkurt E (2001). Neotectonics of Turkey – a syn- thesis. Geodinamica Acta. 14: 3–30.
Bozkurt E & Oberhänsli R (2001). Menderes Mas- sif (Western Turkey): structural, metamorphic and magmatic evolution – a synthesis. Interna- tional Journal of Earth Sciences. 89: 679–708.
Bozkurt E & Sözbilir H (2004). Tectonic evolution of the Gediz graben: field evidence for an epi- sodic, two-stage extension in western Turkey. Geological Magazine. 141: 63–79.
Bozkurt E & Oberhänsli R (2001). Menderes Mas- sif (Western Turkey): structural, metamorphic and magmatic evolution – a synthesis. Interna- tional Journal of Earth Sciences. 89: 679–708.
Bunbury JM, Hall L, Anderson GJ & Stannard A (2001). The determination of fault movement history from the interaction of local drainage with volcanic episodes. Geological Magazine. 138: 185–192.
Canet J & Jaoul P (1946). Manisa-Aydın-Ku- la-Gördes bölgesi, jeolojisi hakkında rapor 1: MTA Derleme, Raporu no. 2068.
Ercan T & Öztunalı Ö (1982). Characteristic fea- tures and “base surge” bed forms of the Kula volcanics. Geological Bulletin of Turkey. 25: 117–125 (in Turkish with English summary).
Ercan E, Türkecan A, Dinçel A & Günay E (1983). Geology of Kula Selendi (Manisa) area. Jeoloji Mühendisliği. 17: 3–28 (in Turkish).
Ercan T (1993). Interpretation of geochemical, ra- diometric and isotopic data on Kula volcanics (Manisa-western Anatolia). Geological Bulle- tin of Turkey. 36: 113–129.
Erdoğan E & Güngör T (2004). The problem of the core-cover boundary of the Menderes Mas- sif and an emplacement mechanism for region- ally extensive gneissic granites, western Anato- lia (Turkey). Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 13: 15–36.
Erinc S (1970). The young volcanic topography of the Kula-Adala area. Istanbul Universitesi Cografya Enstitütü Dergisi 17, 7–22.
Ersoy Y, Helvacı C & Sözbilir H (2010). Tecto- no-stratigraphic evolution of the NE–SWtrend- ing superimposed Selendi basin: implica- tions for late Cenozoic crustal extension in Western Anatolia, Turkey. Tectonophysics. 488: 210–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tec- to.2010.01.007
Göksu Y (1978). The themıolumlnescence age determination of fossil human footprints. Ar- chaeo-Physika. 10: 455-464.
Güleç N (1991). Crust–mantle interaction in west- ern Turkey: implications from Sr and Nd iso- tope geochemistry of Tertiary and Quaternary volcanics. Geological Magazine. 128: 417–435.
Gümüş E (2014). Geoparks: Multidisciplinary Tools for the Protection and Management of geoheritage in Turkey. Kula Volcanic Area (Manisa) and Camlidere Fossil Forest (Ankara) as Case Studies. Aegean University, Mytilene, Grecce (PhD Thesis).
Hamilton WJ & Strickland HE (1841). On the ge- ology of the western part of Asia Minor. Trans- actions of the Geological Society of London. 6: 1–39
Jones HL (1954). The Geography of Strabon. (3rd
ed. vol. 5). Loeb Classical Library, London.
Joyce B (2009). Geomorphosites and volcanism. In Reynard E, Coratz P, RegoliniBissing G (eds.), Geomorphosites (pp. 175–188.) Verlag Dr. Friedrich Pfeil, München, Germany.
Joyce B (2010a). Volcano tourism in the new Kanawinka global Geopark of Victoria and SE South Australia. In Erfurt-Cooper P & Cooper M (eds), Volcano and Geothermal Tourism. Sustainable Geo-resources for Leisure and Rec- reation (pp. 302–311). Earthscan, London, UK.
Joyce E (2010b). Australia’s geoheritage: history of study, a new inventory of geosites and appli- cations to geotourism and geoparks. Geoheri- tage. 2: 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371- 010-0011-z
Koralay E, Dora O, Chen F & Candan O (2004). Geochemistry and geochronology of or- thogneisses in the Derbent (Alaşehir) area, east- ern part of the Ödemiş-Kiraz submassif, Men- deres Massif: Pan-African magmatic activity. Turkish Journal of Earth Sciences. 13: 37–61.
Maddy D, Demir T, Veldkamp A, Bridgland DR, Stemerdink C, van der Schriek T & Schreve D (2012). The obliquity-controlled early Pleisto- cene terrace sequence of the Gediz River, West- ern Turkey: a revised correlation and chronolo- gy. Journal of the Geological Society of London. 169: 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1144/0016-
76492011-011.
Maddy D, Veldkamp A, Demir T, Aytaç AS, Schoorl JM, Scaife R, Boomer I, Stemerdink C, van der Schriek T, Aksay S & Lievens C (2020). Early Pleistocene river terraces of the Gediz River, Turkey: the role of faulting, frac- turing, volcanism and travertines in their gene- sis. Geomorphology. 358: 107102. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2020.107102
Maddy D, Veldkamp A, Demir T, van Gorp W, Wijbrans JR, van Hinsbergen DJJ, Dekkers MJ, Schreve D, Schoorl JM, Scaife R, Stemerdink C, van der Schriek T, Bridgland DR & Aytaç AS (2017). The Gediz River fluvial archive: a benchmark for Quaternary research in Western Anatolia. Quaternary Science Review. 166: 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quasci- rev.2016.07.031
Meijer PT & Wortel MJR (1997). Present-day dy- namics of the Aegean region: a model analysis of the horizontal pattern of stress and deforma- tion. Tectonics. 16: 879–895.
Migon P & Pijet-Migon E (2016). Geoconserva- tion and tourism at geothermal sites—lessons learnt from the Taupo volcanic zone, New Zea- land. Proceedings of the Geologists Associa- tion. 127: 413–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. pgeola.2016.04.002
Németh K, Casadevall T, Moufti RM & Marti J
(2017). Volcanic geoheritage. Geoheritage. 9:
251–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-017-
0257-9
Ozaner FS (1992). Detecting the polycyclic drain- age evolution in Kula region (western Turkey) using aerial photographs. ITC J. 1992e1993, 249e253.
Ozansoy FS (1969). Türkiye Pleistosen fosil insan ayak izleri. M aden Tetkik ve Arama Enstitüsü Dergisi. 72: 204-208.
Philippson A (1913). Das Vulkangebiet von Kula in Lydien, die Katakekaumane der Alten. Pe- termanns Geographische Mitteilungen. 2: 237–
241.
Richardson-Bunbury JM (1992). The basalts of Kula and their relation to extension in western Turkey. PhD thesis. Cambridge University.
Richardson-Bunbury JM (1996). The Kula volca- nic field, western Turkey: the development of a Holocene alkali basalt province and the adja- cent normal faulting graben. Geological Maga- zine. 133: 275–283.
Seyitoğlu G (1997). Late Cenozoic tectono-sedi- mentary development of the Selendi and Uşak– Güre basins: a contribution to the discussion on the development of east– west and north trend- ing basins in western Turkey. Journal of the Geological Society of London. 134: 163–175.
Seyitoğlu G, Işık V & Çemen İ (2004). Complete Tertiary exhumation history of the Menderes massif, western Turkey: an alternative working hypothesis. Terra Nova. 16: 358-364.
Tekkaya I (1976). Insanlara ait fosil ayak izleri: yeryuvavarı ve insan [Human fossil footprints: the prints and the person]. Cog˘rafya. 1: 8–10.
Texier C (1862). Asie Mineure: Description Géo- graphique, Historique et Archéologique des Provinces et des Villes de la Chersonnèse d’Asie ( Vol. 12). Didier Frères, Paris.
Türe A (2018). Kula-Salihli Volkanik Jeopark’ı Sa- lihli- Adala-Gökeyüp Rotası, Jeopark Belediye- ler Birliği Kültür Yayını
Ulusoy I, Sarıkaya MA, Schmitt AK, Şen E, Dan- isík M & Gümüş E (2019). Volcanic eruption eye-witnessed and recorded by prehistoric humans. Quaternary Science Reviews. 212: 187–198 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quasci- rev.2019.03.030
van Gorp W, Veldkamp A, Temme AJAM, Mad- dy D, Demir T, van der Schriek T, Reimann T,
Wallinga J, Wijbrans J & Schoorl JM (2013). Fluvial response to Holocene volcanic dam- ming and breaching in the Gediz and Ge- ren rivers, western Turkey. Geomorphology. 201: 430–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geo- morph.2013.07.016
Washington HS (1894). On the basalts of Kula.
American Journal of Science. 47: 114.
Washington HS (1900). The composition of ku- laite. Journal of Geology. 8: 610–620.
