<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
<PublisherName>OICC Press</PublisherName>
<JournalTitle>International Journal of Mathematical Modelling &amp; Computations</JournalTitle>
<Issn>2228-6233</Issn>
<Volume>2</Volume>
<Issue>3</Issue>
<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</PubDate>
</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>MAXIMAL ALLOCATED BENEFIT AND MINIMAL ALLOCATED COST AND ITS APPLICATION</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
<FirstPage>199</FirstPage>
<LastPage>210</LastPage>
<ELocationID EIdType="doi"></ELocationID>
<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
<LastName>Mansouri Kaleibar</LastName>
<Affiliation>Young Researchers Club, Tabriz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz, Iran	
Iran, Islamic Republic of</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID"></Identifier>
</Author>
<Author>
<FirstName>S.</FirstName>
<LastName>Daneshvar</LastName>
<Affiliation></Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID"></Identifier>
</Author>
</AuthorList>
<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
<History>
<PubDate PubStatus="received">
<Year>2016</Year>
<Month>06</Month>
<Day>21</Day>
</PubDate>
</History>
<Abstract>In this paper, we investigate the problems of consensus-making among institution in stock exchange with multiple criteria for evaluating performance when the players (institutions) are supposed to be egoistic and the score for each criterion for a player is supposed to be a positive score. Each player sticks to his superiority regarding the criteria. This paperintroduces the models for computing minimal cost ratio and the maximal benefit for institutions.
</Abstract>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>