10.1007/s40095-019-00329-w

A robust optimization model for a biofuel supply chain under demand uncertainty

HTML PDF
  • Fatemeh Delkhosh*1,
  • Seyed Jafar Sadjadi1,
  1. Industrial Engineering Department, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, IR
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2019-12-17

How to Cite

Delkhosh, F., & Sadjadi, S. J. (2019). A robust optimization model for a biofuel supply chain under demand uncertainty. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 11(2 (June 2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40095-019-00329-w
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 23

PDF views: 122

Abstract

Abstract The growing demand for fuels combined with the fact that there are limited fossil fuel resources has led the world to seek renewable energy resources such as biofuels. Micro-algae can be an efficient source of biofuel energy, since it significantly reduces air pollution. In this paper, we develop a micro-algae biofuel supply chain through a two-stage approach. This study aims to commercialize micro-algae as a new source of energy. In the first stage, we utilize the Best-Worst Method (BWM) to determine the best cultivation system, and in the second stage, a bi-objective mathematical model is presented which simultaneously optimizes the economic and environmental objectives. We also propose a robust optimization model to deal with the uncertain nature of the biofuel supply chain. Our analysis on the trade-off between the supply chain’s total cost and unfulfillment demand arrives at interesting managerial insights. Furthermore, to show the effectiveness of the robust optimization model, we compare the performance of the robust and deterministic models, and the results show that the robust model dominates over the deterministic model in all scenarios. Finally, sensitivity analysis on critical parameters is conducted to help decision-makers find the optimal trade-off between investment and its benefits.

Keywords

  • Mathematical modeling,
  • Robust optimization,
  • Supply chain,
  • Biomass,
  • Renewable energy
HTML PDF

References

  1. Ahmad et al. (2011) Microalgae as a sustainable energy source for biodiesel production: a review 15(1) (pp. 584-593)
  2. Ahn et al. (2015) Strategic planning design of microalgae biomass-to-biodiesel supply chain network: multi-period deterministic model (pp. 528-542)
  3. An et al. (2011) A mathematical model to design a lignocellulosic biofuel supply chain system with a case study based on a region in central texas 102(17) (pp. 7860-7870)
  4. Arabi et al. (2019) A mathematical model for microalgae-based biobutanol supply chain network design under harvesting and drying uncertainties (pp. 1004-1016)
  5. Arenas et al. (2017) Microalgae as a potential source for biodiesel production: techniques, methods, and other challenges 41(6) (pp. 761-789)
  6. Asadi et al. (2018) A bi-objective stochastic location-inventory-routing model for microalgae-based biofuel supply chain (pp. 2235-2261)
  7. Babazadeh et al. (2017) An integrated data envelopment analysis-mathematical programming approach to strategic biodiesel supply chain network design problem (pp. 694-707)
  8. Bairamzadeh et al. (2015) Multiobjective robust possibilistic programming approach to sustainable bioethanol supply chain design under multiple uncertainties 55(1) (pp. 237-256)
  9. Chen and Fan (2012) Bioethanol supply chain system planning under supply and demand uncertainties 48(1) (pp. 150-164)
  10. Chisti (2007) Biodiesel from microalgae 25(3) (pp. 294-306)
  11. Corsano et al. (2011) Optimal design for sustainable bioethanol supply chain considering detailed plant performance model 35(8) (pp. 1384-1398)
  12. Giarola et al. (2011) Spatially explicit multi-objective optimisation for design and planning of hybrid first and second generation biorefineries 35(9) (pp. 1782-1797)
  13. Gong and You (2014) Global optimization for sustainable design and synthesis of algae processing network for co2 mitigation and biofuel production using life cycle optimization 60(9) (pp. 3195-3210)
  14. Huang et al. (2010) Multistage optimization of the supply chains of biofuels 46(6) (pp. 820-830)
  15. Izquierdo, J., Minciardi, R., Montalvo, I., Robba, M., Tavera, M.: Particle swarm optimization for the biomass supply chain strategic planning (2008)
  16. Jabbarzadeh et al. (2014) Dynamic supply chain network design for the supply of blood in disasters: a robust model with real world application (pp. 225-244)
  17. Jorquera et al. (2010) Comparative energy life-cycle analyses of microalgal biomass production in open ponds and photobioreactors 101(4) (pp. 1406-1413)
  18. Khoo et al. (2011) Life cycle energy and co2 analysis of microalgae-to-biodiesel: preliminary results and comparisons 102(10) (pp. 5800-5807)
  19. Kim et al. (2010) Simultaneous design and operation decisions for biorefmery supply chain networks: centralized vs. distributed system 43(5) (pp. 73-78)
  20. Klibi et al. (2010) The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review 203(2) (pp. 283-293)
  21. Komala and Prasad (2014) Utilization pattern of biomass energy and socioeconomic dimensions associated with yelandur, karnataka, india 5(2–3)
  22. Konur, O.: Bioenergy and biofuels science and technology: scientometric overview and citation classics. In: Bioenergy and Biofuels. CRC Press, pp 39–100 (2018)
  23. Lee and Lavoie (2013) From first-to third-generation biofuels: challenges of producing a commodity from a biomass of increasing complexity 3(2) (pp. 6-11)
  24. Liao et al. (2016) Fuelling the future: microbial engineering for the production of sustainable biofuels 14(5)
  25. Liu et al. (2017) Supply chain optimization of forest biomass electricity and bioethanol coproduction (pp. 630-645)
  26. Maggioni and Wallace (2012) Analyzing the quality of the expected value solution in stochastic programming 200(1) (pp. 37-54)
  27. Mata et al. (2010) Microalgae for biodiesel production and other applications: a review 14(1) (pp. 217-232)
  28. Mohseni and Pishvaee (2016) A robust programming approach towards design and optimization of microalgae-based biofuel supply chain (pp. 58-71)
  29. Mohseni and Pishvaee (2019) Data-driven robust optimization for wastewater sludge-to-biodiesel supply chain design https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.07.001
  30. Mulvey and Ruszczyński (1995) A new scenario decomposition method for large-scale stochastic optimization 43(3) (pp. 477-490)
  31. Mulvey et al. (1995) Robust optimization of large-scale systems 43(2) (pp. 264-281)
  32. Naik et al. (2010) Production of first and second generation biofuels: a comprehensive review 14(2) (pp. 578-597)
  33. Pons, M., Spanjers, H., Baetens, D., Nowak, O., Gillot, S., Nouwen, J., Schuttinga, N.: Wastewater characteristics in Europe-a survey. Eur. Water Manag. Online
  34. 4
  35. (10) (2004)
  36. Qazi (2014) Thermophilic fermentations of lignocellulosic substrates and economics of biofuels: prospects in pakistan 5(2–3)
  37. Rezaei (2015) Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method (pp. 49-57)
  38. Rezaei et al. (2016) A supplier selection life cycle approach integrating traditional and environmental criteria using the best worst method (pp. 577-588)
  39. Rodrigues et al. (2017) Upgrading the glycerol from biodiesel production as a source of energy carriers and chemicals–a technological review for three chemical pathways 10(11)
  40. Santibañez-Aguilar et al. (2016) Stochastic design of biorefinery supply chains considering economic and environmental objectives (pp. 224-245)
  41. Seo et al. (2016) Lipid extraction from microalgae cell using persulfate-based oxidation (pp. 1073-1075)
  42. Shafiee and Topal (2009) When will fossil fuel reserves be diminished? 37(1) (pp. 181-189)
  43. Slade and Bauen (2013) Micro-algae cultivation for biofuels: cost, energy balance, environmental impacts and future prospects (pp. 29-38)
  44. Sy et al. (2018) Multi-objective target oriented robust optimization for the design of an integrated biorefinery (pp. 496-509)
  45. Tan et al. (2015) Fuzzy analytical hierarchy process (ahp) for multi-criteria selection in drying and harvesting process of microalgae system (pp. 829-834)
  46. Ubando, A.T., Aviso, K., Culaba, A., Ng, D., Tan, R.R.: Fuzzy multi-objective approach for designing of biomass supply chain for polygeneration with triple footprint constraints. In: ASME 2013 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection (2013)
  47. Ubando et al. (2016) Application of stochastic analytic hierarchy process for evaluating algal cultivation systems for sustainable biofuel production 18(5) (pp. 1281-1294)
  48. Ubando, A.T., Cuello, J.L., El-Halwagi, M.M., Culaba, A.B., Tan, R.R.: Multi-regional multi-objective optimization of an algal biofuel polygeneration supply chain with fuzzy mathematical programming. In: ASME 2014 8th International Conference on Energy Sustainability Collocated with the ASME 2014 12th International Conference on Fuel Cell Science, Engineering and Technology. American Society of Mechanical Engineers Digital Collection (2014)
  49. Wang et al. (2013) Sustainable design and synthesis of hydrocarbon biorefinery via gasification pathway: integrated life cycle assessment and technoeconomic analysis with multiobjective superstructure optimization (pp. 55-76)
  50. Wang et al. (2012) An optimization model for energy crop supply 4(1) (pp. 88-95)
  51. Yang et al. (2011) Life-cycle analysis on biodiesel production from microalgae: water footprint and nutrients balance 102(1) (pp. 159-165)
  52. Yu and Li (2000) A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems 64(1–3) (pp. 385-397)