10.1186/2251-6832-3-29

Screening and evaluation of innate coagulants for water treatment: a sustainable approach

HTML PDF
  • Saritha Vara*1,
  1. Department of Environmental Studies, GITAM Institute of Science, GITAM University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, 530045, IN
Cover Image

Published in Issue 2012-10-05

How to Cite

Vara, S. (2012). Screening and evaluation of innate coagulants for water treatment: a sustainable approach. International Journal of Energy and Environmental Engineering, 3(1 (December 2012). https://doi.org/10.1186/2251-6832-3-29
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

HTML views: 25

PDF views: 105

Abstract

Abstract Access to safe drinking water is important as a health and development issue at national, regional, and local levels. About one billion people do not have healthy drinking water. More than six million people (about two million children) die because of diarrhea which is caused by polluted water. Developing countries pay a high cost to import chemicals including polyaluminium chloride and alum. This is the reason why these countries need low-cost methods requiring low maintenance and skill. The use of synthetic coagulants is not regarded as suitable due to health and economic considerations. The present study was aimed to investigate the effects of alum as coagulant in conjunction with bean, sago, and chitin as coagulants on the removal of color, turbidity, hardness, and Escherichia coli from water. A conventional jar test apparatus was employed for the tests. The study was taken up in three stages, initially with synthetic waters, followed by testing of the efficiency of coagulants individually on surface waters and, lastly, testing of blended coagulants. The experiment was conducted at three different pH conditions of 6, 7, and 8. The dosages chosen were 0.5, 1, 1.5, and 2 mg/l. The results showed that turbidity decrease provided also a primary E. coli reduction. Hardness removal efficiency was observed to be 93% at pH 7 with 1-mg/l concentration by alum, whereas chitin was stable at all the pH ranges showing the highest removal at 1 and 1.5mg/l with pH 7. In conclusion, using natural coagulants results in considerable savings in chemicals and sludge handling cost may be achieved.

Keywords

  • Alum,
  • Chitin,
  • Sago,
  • Bean,
  • Coagulation,
  • Turbidity
HTML PDF

References

  1. Rosenberg et al. (2000) Global-scale environmental effects of hydrological alterations: introduction (pp. 746-751) https://doi.org/10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0746:GSEEOH]2.0.CO;2
  2. Choi et al. (2006) Removal efficiencies of endocrine disrupting chemicals by coagulation/flocculation, ozonation, powdered/granular activated carbon adsorption, and chlorination (pp. 399-408) https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02706741
  3. Rook (1974) The formation of haloforms during chlorination of natural waters (pp. 234-243)
  4. GrasieleScaramal et al. (2010) Study of the effect of saline solution on the extraction of the Moringa oleifera seed's active component for water treatment (pp. 409-415) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-009-0309-0
  5. Mackenzie and Cornwell (1991) (pp. 157-163) McGraw Hill
  6. Fatoki and Ogunfowokan (2002) Effect of coagulant treatment on the metal composition of raw water 28(3) (pp. 293-298) https://doi.org/10.4314/wsa.v28i3.4897
  7. McLachlan (1995) Aluminum and the risk for Alzheimer's disease (pp. 233-275) https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170060303
  8. Ko et al. (2007) Evaluation of a pilot scale dual media biological activated carbon process for drinking water (pp. 253-260) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-007-5038-8
  9. Moon et al. (2003)
  10. Merlet et al. (1991) Enlevement de la matiere organique dans les filters CAB (pp. 143-164) https://doi.org/10.7202/705157ar
  11. Rook (1976) Haloforms in drinking water (pp. 168-172)
  12. Joret et al. (1991) Biodegradable dissolved organic carbon (BDOC) content of drinking water and potential regrowth of bacteria (pp. 95-101)
  13. Kawamura (1991) Effectiveness of natural polyelectrolytes in water treatment 79(6) (pp. 88-91)
  14. Singer and Chang (1989) Correlations between trihalomethanes and total organic halides formed during water treatment (pp. 61-65)
  15. Edzwald et al. (1985) Surrogate parameters for Monitoring Organic Matter and THM precursors (pp. 122-132)
  16. Reckhow et al. (1990) Chlorination of humic materials: byproduct formation and chemical interpretations (pp. 1655-1664) https://doi.org/10.1021/es00081a005
  17. Camp and Root (1913) Effect of temperature on rate of floc formation
  18. Kawamura (1976)
  19. Muyibi and Evison (1995) Moringa oleifera seeds for softening hard water 29(4) (pp. 1099-1105) https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(94)00250-B
  20. Driscoll and Letterman (1995) Factors regulating residual aluminium concentrations in treated waters (pp. 287-309) https://doi.org/10.1002/env.3170060306
  21. Taggart and Eliasson (2004) Starch as an ingredient: manufacture and applications Woodhead Publishing Limited and CRC Press LLC
  22. Dzulkefly et al. (2007) Chemical modification of sago starch by solventless esterification with fatty acid chlorides 11(2) (pp. 395-399)
  23. Unknown (2005) APHA
  24. Lin et al. (1971) (pp. 1-19) Report of Investigation 68. Illinois State Water Survey
  25. Ebeling et al. (2003) Evaluation of chemical coagulation–flocculation aids for the removal of suspended solids and phosphorus from intensive recirculating aquaculture effluent discharge (pp. 23-42)
  26. Divakaran and Pillai (2002) Flocculation of river silt using chitosan (pp. 2414-2418) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00436-5
  27. Jose Rene et al. (2010) Chitin based biocomposites for removal of contaminants from water: a case study of fluoride adsorption (pp. 163-180) Sciyo
  28. Ravi Kumar (2000) A review of chitin and chitosan applications 46(1) (pp. 1-27) https://doi.org/10.1016/S1381-5148(00)00038-9
  29. An et al. (2001) Crab shell for the removal of heavy metals from aqueous solution 35(15) (pp. 3551-3556) https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(01)00099-9
  30. Bratskaya et al. (2005) Starch derivatives of high degree of functionalization 10. Flocculation of kaolin dispersions. Colloids and Surfaces. A (pp. 75-80) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2004.11.030
  31. FatehahMohd et al. (2008) COD reduction in semiconductor wastewater by natural and commercialized coagulants using response surface methodology (pp. 345-352) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-008-9751-7
  32. Qudsieh et al. (2008) Preparation and characterization of a new coagulant based on the sago starch biopolymer and its application in water turbidity removal 109(5) (pp. 3140-3147) https://doi.org/10.1002/app.28399
  33. Gassenschmidt et al. (1995) Isolation and characterization of a flocculating protein from Moringa oleifera Lam 1243(3) (pp. 477-481) https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4165(94)00176-X
  34. Tandon et al. (2005) Inactivation of Escherichia coli and coliform bacteria in traditional brass and earthenware water storage vessels (pp. 35-48) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-004-7366-6
  35. Ghebremichael et al. (2005) A simple purification and activity assay of the coagulant protein from Moringa oleifera seed 39(11) (pp. 2338-2344) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.04.012
  36. Özacar and Sengil (2003) Evaluation of tannin biopolymer as a coagulant aid for coagulation of colloidal particles 229(1–3) (pp. 85-96) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2003.07.006
  37. Tyagi et al. (2006) Alternative microbial indicators of faecalpollution:current perspective 3(3) (pp. 205-216)
  38. Roussy et al. (2005) Influence of chitosan characteristics on the coagulation and the flocculation of bentonite suspensions (pp. 3247-3258) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.039
  39. Qin et al. (2006) Water-solubility of chitosan and its antimicrobial activity (pp. 367-374) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.09.023
  40. Bina (1995) The use of Moringa oleifera seed as natural plant coagulant in removal of clay particles and E.coli (pp. 4-12)