10.57647/j.jap.2025.0901.14

Investigation of the Extra-Organizational Collaborations in Reduction Environmental Pollutions of Tourism Development on Qeshm Island Using Network Analysis Approach

  1. Department of Environment, QI.C, Islamic Azad University, Qeshm, Iran
  2. Department of Environmental Science and Engineering, BA.C, Islamic Azad University, Bandar Abbas, Iran
  3. Department of Forestry, Gorgan University of Agriculture Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
  4. Department of Natural Resources and Environmental, SR.C, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Received: 2025-03-17

Revised: 2025-04-05

Accepted: 2025-06-02

Published in Issue 2025-07-01

How to Cite

Shayesteh, A., Dehghani Ghanatghestani, M., Jabbarzadeh, M., Mohammadi Kangarani, H., & Taghavi, L. (2025). Investigation of the Extra-Organizational Collaborations in Reduction Environmental Pollutions of Tourism Development on Qeshm Island Using Network Analysis Approach. Anthropogenic Pollution, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.57647/j.jap.2025.0901.14

PDF views: 32

Abstract

The environment is the central core of the natural tourism industry; therefore, tourism development directly depends on the environment health. This means that institutional reforms and intra-organizational decisions related to tourism management cannot be considered as an independent and separate issue from environmental management. This research examines the level of cooperation and participation of Qeshm Island’s residents with environmental decisions and actions of government organizations to achieve an efficient model for the successful implementation of environmental decisions which guarantee tourism sustainable development on Qeshm Island. For this purpose, various types of public communication and island tourism activists (governors of rural districts, council members, local people, and other individuals) with government organizations were examined regarding their environmental approaches affecting tourism on Qeshm Island through selecting environmental pollution criteria as one of the determinant limitations in the tourism development on Qeshm Island and applying a network analysis approach. At first, 50 questionnaires were completed and data were analyzed by using the Ucinet and Netdraw software to analyze these variables through the snowball sampling method and visiting the organizations and departments which affect impact the tourism industry and also the organizations and departments related to environmental management and protection on Qeshm Island. Regarding the level of referring to government organizations, the results showed that governors of rural districts and local people with a degree centrality of 33 and intermediate centrality of 460/ 663 and 575/979, respectively, have the most referral to government organizations. Through the cooperation network, the local people with a degree centrality of 38 and intermediate centrality of 456/500 and council members with a degree centrality of 36 and betweenness centrality of 460/ 663 are the most cooperators in carrying out the activities related to environmental pollution reduction on Qeshm Island. The degree centrality of 42 and the betweenness centrality of 249/398 for the council members showed that they have the highest level of trust in government organizations. Generally, among all the variables, governors of rural districts, council members, and local people have the most relevant activities, cooperation, and trust for environmental pollution reduction related to government organizations on this island, respectively. Therefore, it can be concluded that environmental challenges such as environmental pollution will be reduced by optimizing this network and increasing social capital among this group.

Keywords

  • Environment health,
  • Tourism development,
  • Qeshm Island,
  • Extra-Organizational collaboration,
  • Social capital

References

  1. 1. Aloch QB, Shah SN, Iqbal N, Sheeraz M, Asadullah M, Mahar S, Khan AU (2023) Impact of tourism development upon environmental sustainability: a suggested framework for sustainable ecotourism, Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 30(3):5917-5930. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s11356-022-22496-w.
  2. 2. Buckley, R (2011) Tourism and Environment, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, Vol. 36:397-416, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-041210-132637.
  3. 3. Cutugno, M., & Moretti, A. (2023). Collaborations in the Hospitality Sector in Venice. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4556843
  4. 4. Duit, A (2014) State and Environment the Comparative Study of Environmental Governance, the MIT Press, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027120.001.0001
  5. 5. Duit, A and Hall, O (2014) Causes and Consequences of Stakeholder Participation in Natural Resource Management: Evidence from 143 Biosphere Reserves in Fifty-Five Countries, In: State and Environment the Comparative Study of Environmental Governance, Edited by Andreas Duit, the MIT Press, 293-319, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027120.001.0001
  6. 6. Fobbe, Lea (2020) Analysing Organisational Collaboration Practices for Sustainability, Sustainability, 12, 2466; https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062466.
  7. 7. George, B.P (2007) Tourism and environmental quality management: Comparative perspectives, ASEAN Journal on Hospitality and Tourism 6(1), 29-44, https://doi.org/10.5614/ajht.2007.6.1.03
  8. 8. Hanneman, R.A.; Riddle, M (2005) Introduction to Social Network Methods, University of California.
  9. 9. Holden, Andrew (2008) Environment and Tourism, Second Edition, Taylor & Francis Group, https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937624
  10. 10. Li, G; He, Q; Wang, D and Liu, B (2021) Environmental non-governmental organizations and air-pollution governance: Empirical evidence from OECD countries, PLoS One, 16(8):e0255166. https://doi.org/ 10.1371/journal.pone.0255166
  11. 11. Macdonald, Catherine; Turffs, Dylann; McEntee , Kela; Elliot, Jessica and Wester, Julia (2023) The relationship between tourism and the environment in Florida, USA: A media content analysis, Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, Volume 4, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annale.2023.100092.
  12. 12. Manaf, A; Purbasari, O.N; Damayanti, M; Aprilia, N and Astuti, W (2018) Community-Based Rural Tourism in Inter-Organizational Collaboration: How Does It Work Sustainably? Lessons Learned from Nglanggeran Tourism Village, Gunungkidul Regency, Yogyakarta, Indonesia, Sustainability, 10(7), 2142; https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072142
  13. 13. Martínez-Pérez, Á., Elche, D., & García-Villaverde, P. M. (2019). From diversity of interorganizational relationships to radical innovation in tourism destination: The role of knowledge exploration. Journal of Destination Marketing and Management, 11, 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JDMM.2018.12.002
  14. 14. Meadowcroft, J (2014) Comparing Environmental Performance, In: State and Environment the Comparative Study of Environmental Governance, Edited by Andreas Duit, the MIT Press. 27-51, https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9780262027120.001.0001
  15. 15. Mishra, P. K., Rout, H B and Kestwal, A.K (2019) Tourism-Energy-Environment-Growth Nexus: Evidence from India, Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 10(5), 1180-1191, https://doi.org/ 10.14505//jemt.v10.5(37).25
  16. 16. Nasernasir, E. and Parvaresh, H (2020) Environmental Risk Assessment of Using EFMEA Method for Sustainable Tourism Management (Case Study: Hormoz Island). Tourism Management Studies, 15(52), 345-372, https://doi.org/10.22054/tms.2020.39182.2078
  17. 17. Rasekhi, S and Mohammadi, S (2015) The Relationship between Tourism and Environmental Performance: The Case of Caspian Sea Nations, Iranian Journal of Economic Studies, Vol. 4, No. 2, 51-81, https://doi.org/10.22099/ijes.2015.4122.
  18. 18. Rubtsova, N., & Solodukhin, K. (2020). Conceptual model for assessing the effectiveness of inter-organizational relations in the tourism network. 208, 05002. https://doi.org/10.1051/E3SCONF/202020805002
  19. 19. Sharpley, R and Harrison, D (2019) A Research Agenda for Tourism and Development, Chapter 4: NGOs, tourism and development, Edited by Helene Balslev Clausen, 71–87, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788112413.00010.
  20. 20. Souza, G.D., Dabezies, J. M (2019) Tourism development and environmental conservation: tensions in the protected landscape of Lunarejo Valley, Uruguay, Rosa dos Ventos, 11(2), 253-268, https://doi.org/10.18226/21789061.v11i2p253
  21. 21. Tahmasebi, Asghar and Zavarniya, Mehri (2020) Network Analysis of Organizational Cooperation in Tourism Destination Management Subject Areas: Mashhad, Social Studies in Tourism, Issue 15 Vol. 8, Spring – Summer, 277-296, http://www.journalitor.ir/en/Article/35884
  22. 22. Vieira, D. P., & Hoffmann, V. E. (2018). A Influência dos relacionamentos para o desempenho das empresas de hospedagem. Caderno Virtual de Turismo, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.18472/CVT.18N1.2018.1325
  23. 23. Wang, Y; Cao, H; Yuan, Y and Zhang, Y (2020) Empowerment through emotional connection and capacity building: Public participation through environmental non-governmental organizations, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, Volume 80, 106319, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106319.
  24. 24. Wäsche, H (2015) Interorganizational cooperation in sport tourism: A social network analysis, Sport Management Review, Volume 18, Issue 4, 542-554, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smr.2015.01.003.
  25. 25. Wilke, E. P; Costa, B.K, Freire, O. B. D.L and Ferreira, M.P (2019) Interorganizational cooperation in tourist destination: Building performance in the hotel industry, Tourism Management, Volume 72, Pages 340-351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.015.
  26. 26. Wilke, E; Costa, B. K; Freire O.B.D.L and Ferreira, M.A.S.P.V (2019) Interorganizational cooperation in tourist destination: Building performance in the hotel industry, Tourism Management 72(3):340-351, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.12.015
  27. 27. Xiao, H (2024) Analysis of the Combination of the Regional Natural Environment and Local Characteristics of the Tourism Industry under the Perspective of Synergistic Development, Journal of Environmental and Public Health, Volume 2024, Issue 1, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2955401.